Update @tailwindcss/postcss 4.1.18 → 4.2.0 (minor)#554
Update @tailwindcss/postcss 4.1.18 → 4.2.0 (minor)#554depfu[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
guibranco
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]
|
@depfu merge |
DeepSource reviewed changes in the commit range For detailed review results, please see the PR on DeepSource ↗ PR Report Card
Code Review Summary
How are these analyzer statuses calculated?Administrators can configure which issue categories are reported and cause analysis to be marked as failed when detected. This helps prevent bad and insecure code from being introduced in the codebase. If you're an administrator, you can modify this in the repository's settings. Code Coverage Summary
➟ Additional coverage metrics may have been reported. See full coverage report ↗ |
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs2026-02-19T16:26:07Z INF scanning for exposed secrets...
4:26PM INF 460 commits scanned.
2026-02-19T16:26:07Z INF scan completed in 357ms
2026-02-19T16:26:07Z INF no leaks found
|
|
Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
|
Caution Review the following alerts detected in dependencies. According to your organization's Security Policy, you must resolve all "Block" alerts before proceeding. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
|
|
Closed in favor of #562. |



Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ @tailwindcss/postcss (4.1.18 → 4.2.0)
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
✳️ tailwindcss (4.1.18 → 4.2.0) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
4.2.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.
Release Notes
1.8.1
1.8.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
1.8.1[Backport] feat: add support for Float16Array (#191)1.8.0[Backport] feat: add node_api_set_prototype (#189)Release Notes
1.8.1
1.8.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
1.8.1[Backport] feat: add support for Float16Array (#191)1.8.0[Backport] feat: add node_api_set_prototype (#189)Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Release Notes
5.19.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 4 commits:
chore(release): 5.19.0chore: update eslint config webpack (#471)feat: added TsconfigPathsPlugin (replacement for tsconfig-paths-webpack-plugin) (#463)chore: migrate to npm from yarn (#469)Release Notes
1.31.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Release Notes
1.31.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Release Notes
1.31.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Release Notes
1.31.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Release Notes
1.31.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Release Notes
1.31.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Release Notes
1.31.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Release Notes
1.31.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.
Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands