Google Summer of Code 2025 for Chromium
Hello, this is Amit! I created this repository as a dedicated hub for my final work product submission, which illustrates and highlights my contributions to Chromium during Google Summer of Code - 2025.
The goal: Improve the Chrome Extensions developer experience by enhancing debugging tools, APIs, and extension workflows.
Main focus areas:
- Improvements to
chrome://extensionspage (the hub where developers manage/debug their extensions). - New/Improved Extension APIs (aligning with WECG standards).
- Better debugging experience for Manifest V3 extensions.
Imagine seeing "Errors" on the extensions page every time, even if there were only some harmless warnings. Frustrating, right?
This was the very first bug I worked on in Chromium — and it taught me a lot about how UI labels are tied to backend logic.
- Before: Always showed “Errors” → confusing when only warnings existed.
- After: Now shows “Warnings” when appropriate.
- Result → Developers instantly know whether it’s a critical issue or just a small warning.
📸 UI Update:
| Before | After |
![]() |
![]() |
I remember spending time trying to open the right DevTools for debugging extension errors. It wasn’t straightforward.
So I added a shortcut: a shiny new "View in DevTools" button. One click → you’re in the exact DevTools context you need.
- Added a button in the extension error page to open the right DevTools target directly.
- No more manually finding the right SW or background page!
📸 UI Update:
| Before | After |
![]() |
![]() |
Debugging service workers in extensions is already tricky. I worked on adding metadata (
isServiceWorker,canInspect) so Chromium knows where exactly the error belongs.
This way, even if a Service Worker is inactive, DevTools can spin it up and take you to the right place.
- Added:
isServiceWorker→ flags if error belongs to a Service Worker.canInspect→ allows DevTools inspection if error is from a SW.
- Enables correct DevTools target selection (even for inactive SWs).
Ever wondered how an extension knows your system’s UI language? I implemented an API that gives this info as a proper BCP 47 language tag — cross-platform and standards-compliant.
- Returns OS language as BCP 47 tag (
en-US,fr-FR, etc.). - Special handling for
C/POSIX→ maps toen-US. - Cross-platform support: Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Added comprehensive test coverage.
- Added
persistAcrossSessionsflag inchrome.alarms.create. - Default:
true→ alarms survive browser restarts. - Session-only alarms vanish after restart.
📸 Example Flow:
chrome.alarms.create("dailyCheck", { delayInMinutes: 5, persistAcrossSessions: true });Think of content-blocking extensions. They often need to filter requests based on headers like
User-Agent.
I laid the groundwork for this by adding IDL types and parsing logic — ensuring headers are valid, consistent, and safe to use.
- Added IDL types and parsing for request headers.
- Validates header names, values, and excluded values.
- Ensures rules remain consistent (e.g., no conflicts between include/exclude headers).
Imagine capturing a query string like
q=hello%20world. Without decoding, it looks messy.
With my WIP feature, you can transform regex groups (e.g.,decodeURIComponent) before substitution →"hello world"instead of"hello%20world".
- Extends Declarative Net Request substitutions with transform operations.
- First operation:
decodeURIComponent. - Designed to be extensible for future transforms (e.g.,
toLowerCase,encodeURIComponent).
📜 Example manifest:
"regexSubstitutionTransforms": [
{ "group": 1, "operation": "decodeURIComponent" }
]Working on Chromium was both exciting and challenging. Some of the toughest hurdles I faced:
- 🧩 Huge Codebase → Navigating millions of lines of C++ and JS while understanding the extensions architecture.
- 🔄 DevTools Integration → Figuring out how DevTools connects with background contexts and service workers.
- 🧪 Testing Complexity → Understanding Chromium’s testing framework was tough. I had to learn how to design and add the right test files that covered edge cases thoroughly, while making sure I didn’t break or alter existing logic and flows.
- 📏 Standards vs. Implementation → Balancing WECG specifications with Chrome-specific requirements.
- ⏱️ Debugging Build Issues → Chromium builds are long and resource-heavy; fixing small errors often meant multiple rebuilds.
My journey with Chromium doesn’t stop here. I’m looking forward to:
- ✅ Completing DNR header indexing for full request header matching.
- ⚙️ Finishing regex substitution transforms to allow flexible query parameter handling.
- 🌱 Exploring more opportunities to contribute to the Chromium Extensions team — whether through GSoC 2026 or independent contributions outside the program.
I am deeply grateful to my mentors:
- Oliver Dunk
- Solomon Kinard
- Sreeja Kamishetty
for their guidance, patience, and detailed reviews. Every discussion helped me sharpen my approach and think like a browser engineer.
- 🚀 Contributed to the Chromium codebase for GSoC’25 under the Chrome Extensions team.
- 🛠️ Gained hands-on experience with browser internals, debugging flows, and API design.
- 🧪 Learned to write robust tests that catch edge cases without disrupting existing flows.
- 🎯 Managed complexity in a massive open-source project.
- 💡 Built confidence in collaborating with mentors and the community.
- 🌱 Most importantly → I grew from being just a user of Chrome to a contributor to the browser itself.



