Refactor SqueezeThm statement to include N parameter #18
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello Professor Kontorovich, I believe Squeeze Theorem should be slightly altered. I believe it should be:
Let (an), (cn) be two sequences converging to ℓ, and (bn) a sequence. If ∀ n ≥ N, N ∈ N we have an ≤ bn ≤ cn, then (bn) also converges to ℓ.
Currently we don't have the constraint N, and it's just an ≤ bn ≤ cn for all n, which isn't what Squeeze Theorem is.
I actually had issue with this in latest homework, because I cannot use the sequence 1/n as part of my squeeze theorem, as when n= 0 it's invalid and the an ≤ bn ≤ cn doesn't work. Fixing the definition would allow it to work that way.
Thank you for considering this suggestion!