FIX export posMobile and add test coverage

[jeandersonbc]

Description

Exports the generated PosMobileApi to main Adyen module. In addition, the test coverage ensures that users can invoke the related methods

Tested scenarios

• Class is exported and can be used by clients

Fixed issue:

• feat: add AdyenPosMobileApi to services module #399

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @jeandersonbc, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on integrating the PosMobileApi into the Adyen Python client library. It ensures that the API is correctly exposed and initialized within the main Adyen module, making it readily available for use by developers. Furthermore, it introduces dedicated test coverage to validate the functionality of the PosMobileApi, specifically for creating communication sessions, thereby enhancing the reliability and maintainability of the library.

Highlights

• API Export: The AdyenPosMobileApi class is now properly exported and made available through the main Adyen module, allowing clients to access its functionalities.
• Module Initialization: An instance of AdyenPosMobileApi is initialized as self.posMobile within the Adyen class, making it accessible via adyen.posMobile.
• Test Coverage: New test cases have been added in test/PosMobileTest.py to ensure the correct functionality and accessibility of the PosMobileApi, specifically for the create_communication_session method.
• Mock Data: A new mock JSON file (create-communication-session-success.json) has been added to support the new test cases for the PosMobileApi.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request successfully exports the new PosMobileApi and adds test coverage for it. The changes are generally good and follow the existing patterns in the codebase. I have a few suggestions to improve the new test file by adhering to standard unit testing practices for better isolation and maintainability. I also noticed a minor style issue with missing newlines at the end of some of the new/modified files.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud