-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
Fix name clash with json module #100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Greptile OverviewGreptile SummaryFixed the name clash between the Changes:
All references to the json module have been correctly updated throughout the file. The change is straightforward, improves code clarity, and resolves issue #94. Confidence Score: 5/5
Important Files Changed
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI as cli.py
participant JsonModule as json (as js)
participant Client as ActivityWatchClient
Note over CLI: Import json as js
User->>CLI: aw-client heartbeat <bucket_id> <json_data>
CLI->>JsonModule: js.loads(data)
JsonModule-->>CLI: parsed data
CLI->>Client: client.heartbeat(bucket_id, event, pulsetime)
Client-->>User: heartbeat sent
User->>CLI: aw-client query <path> --json
Note over CLI: json parameter (formerly _json)
CLI->>CLI: read query from path
CLI->>Client: client.query(query, timeperiods)
Client-->>CLI: result
alt json flag is true
CLI->>JsonModule: js.dumps(result)
JsonModule-->>CLI: json string
CLI-->>User: print json output
else json flag is false
CLI-->>User: print formatted output
end
|
Greptile found no issues!From now on, if a review finishes and we haven't found any issues, we will not post anything, but you can confirm that we reviewed your changes in the status check section. This feature can be toggled off in your Code Review Settings by deselecting "Create a status check for each PR". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to cdff3a5 in 1 minute and 44 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
41lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. aw_client/cli.py:3
- Draft comment:
Good use of aliasing: 'import json as js' avoids the name clash with the CLI flag. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. aw_client/cli.py:67
- Draft comment:
Proper update: using js.loads(data) ensures correct JSON parsing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. aw_client/cli.py:109
- Draft comment:
Renaming parameter from _json to json aligns with the CLI flag; consider renaming to 'as_json' to avoid potential shadowing of the json module name. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
4. aw_client/cli.py:117
- Draft comment:
Using js.dumps(result) correctly outputs JSON when the flag is set. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
5. aw_client/cli.py:118
- Draft comment:
Typographical error: Did you mean to calljson.dumps(result)instead ofjs.dumps(result)? The identifier 'js' doesn't seem to be defined. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is factually incorrect. Looking at line 3 of the file, there is clearlyimport json as js, which definesjsas an alias for thejsonmodule. The diff shows this was changed fromimport jsontoimport json as js, and correspondingly all uses ofjson.loadsandjson.dumpswere changed tojs.loadsandjs.dumps. This is a valid refactoring. The comment is wrong and should be deleted. Could there be some edge case where the import statement fails or is conditional? Could I be misreading the diff or the line numbers? No, the import statement at line 3 is unconditional and straightforward. The full file context confirms thatimport json as jsis at the top of the file, and the diff clearly shows this change. There's no edge case here - the comment is simply wrong. This comment is factually incorrect and should be deleted. The identifierjsis clearly defined at line 3 as an alias for thejsonmodule viaimport json as js.
Workflow ID: wflow_R4JS8OdjRERVmV4m
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
|
I don't see the reason for this? _json is already not shadowed by json import. Closing. |
Did you see the linked issue?
Does it work for you when you pass --json? |
|
Ah, I missed that! Sorry 🙈 |
ErikBjare
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see the suggested alternative solution.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No files reviewed, no comments
cdff3a5 to
c946ba3
Compare
|
Thanks! |
fixes #94
Important
Fix name clash with
jsonmodule by aliasing it tojsand updating references inaw_client/cli.py.jsonmodule tojsinaw_client/cli.pyto avoid name clash._jsonparameter tojsoninquery()to avoid conflict withjsonmodule.json.loads()tojs.loads()inheartbeat().json.dumps()tojs.dumps()inquery().This description was created by
for cdff3a5. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.