Skip to content

Conversation

@JonnyBoi-13
Copy link

Fixes: #75

@otizonaizit
Copy link
Member

Finally someone tried this! I vote for merging this and testing it in Plovdiv. If people are more confused, we switch back to attacker-defender.

@Debilski
Copy link
Member

Yeah, it solves the ambiguity for the gatherer at least. I think there is still a small mental mismatch (for me at least) with a hunter that does not attack but just defends its base. But we’ll see. I guess ‘gatherer and defender’ isn’t really a naming option here. :)
Thanks for submitting, we will try it out.

@otizonaizit otizonaizit merged commit 73e80a6 into ASPP:main Jul 16, 2025
3 checks passed
@Debilski
Copy link
Member

A basic hunter bot implies the existence of an acidic gatherer bot. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider new bot class names

3 participants