Skip to content

Conversation

@edoyango
Copy link
Collaborator

Adds a simple test for the TemporalWindow modification class.

@edoyango edoyango force-pushed the temporalwindow_test branch 2 times, most recently from ed85bdc to 7af32cc Compare November 11, 2025 03:26
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 11, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19254324483

Details

  • 18 of 18 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.1%) to 61.321%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 19253696539: 0.1%
Covered Lines: 9584
Relevant Lines: 15214

💛 - Coveralls

@edoyango edoyango force-pushed the temporalwindow_test branch 2 times, most recently from c96a66f to b1925ae Compare November 11, 2025 03:50
@edoyango edoyango force-pushed the temporalwindow_test branch from b1925ae to 3330ed1 Compare November 11, 2025 03:50
@tennlee
Copy link
Collaborator

tennlee commented Nov 11, 2025

Looks good. You could consider parameterising the expected results along with the inputs so you don't need that if statement at the end to recognise which case you're in, but it all check out so I'm merging it. Thanks!

@tennlee tennlee merged commit c23c350 into ACCESS-Community-Hub:develop Nov 11, 2025
6 checks passed
@edoyango
Copy link
Collaborator Author

good point about parametrsing outputs!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants