Add new post: On AI orchestration for the long run#528
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new blog post has been added discussing AI orchestration and its implications for software development. The article questions the autonomous capability of AI in managing development processes and advocates for prioritizing foundational practices. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds a new blog post titled "On AI orchestration for the long run" that presents a philosophical argument about the future of AI in software engineering. The post argues that if AI processes become powerful enough to autonomously handle software development, they will also be capable of orchestrating other AI processes, making human orchestration skills obsolete in such a scenario.
Changes:
- Added new blog post discussing the paradox of AI orchestration as a valuable skill in a future where AI handles software development
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@posts/2026-02-22-on-ai-orchestration-for-the-long-run.md`:
- Line 8: Replace the phrase "going to" with "will" in the prose to use more
direct phrasing; specifically update the sentence starting "Some people claim
that knowing how to tame and properly orchestrate a group of different "AI"
processes is the most useful skill..." (and the other occurrence noted as "Also
applies to: 12-12") so each "going to" becomes "will" while preserving the
surrounding text and punctuation.
- Line 14: Change the compound modifier "software development related" to the
hyphenated form "software-development-related" in the sentence that begins
"Therefore, this operational knowledge..." so the compound adjective correctly
modifies "anything"; locate that exact phrase in the post content and replace it
with the hyphenated version.
- Line 16: The phrase "not perfect and magic" in the sentence "Perhaps, having
this operational knowledge today makes sense, and will keep being valuable in
the short term, although it's not perfect and magic." is awkward; rephrase it to
a more idiomatic alternative such as "although it's not a silver bullet," or
"although it's not perfect or magical," by updating that sentence text to one of
these clearer phrasings to convey the intended meaning; locate the sentence
literal in the post content and replace the phrase accordingly.
| tags: ["ai", "infrastructure", "devops", "software", "engineering"] | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Some people claim that knowing how to tame and properly orchestrate a group of different "AI" processes is the most useful skill a software engineer can have for the future. In fact, this is aligned with the idea that in the future all the software development is going to be handled by those "AI" processes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace going to with will for more direct phrasing.
Both instances describe outcomes treated as certain/expected, where will is the more appropriate and concise form.
✏️ Proposed fix
-Some people claim that knowing how to tame and properly orchestrate a group of different "AI" processes is the most useful skill a software engineer can have for the future. In fact, this is aligned with the idea that in the future all the software development is going to be handled by those "AI" processes.
+Some people claim that knowing how to tame and properly orchestrate a group of different "AI" processes is the most useful skill a software engineer can have for the future. In fact, this is aligned with the idea that in the future all the software development will be handled by those "AI" processes.-In a world where "AI" processes are so powerful that they can manage the software development almost autonomously, why would you think that there will not be an "AI" process itself that is going to be able to tame and eventually orchestrate other "AI" processes?
+In a world where "AI" processes are so powerful that they can manage the software development almost autonomously, why would you think that there will not be an "AI" process itself that will be able to tame and eventually orchestrate other "AI" processes?Also applies to: 12-12
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~8-~8: Use ‘will’ instead of ‘going to’ if the following action is certain.
Context: ...the future all the software development is going to be handled by those "AI" processes. Ho...
(GOING_TO_WILL)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@posts/2026-02-22-on-ai-orchestration-for-the-long-run.md` at line 8, Replace
the phrase "going to" with "will" in the prose to use more direct phrasing;
specifically update the sentence starting "Some people claim that knowing how to
tame and properly orchestrate a group of different "AI" processes is the most
useful skill..." (and the other occurrence noted as "Also applies to: 12-12") so
each "going to" becomes "will" while preserving the surrounding text and
punctuation.
|
|
||
| In a world where "AI" processes are so powerful that they can manage the software development almost autonomously, why would you think that there will not be an "AI" process itself that is going to be able to tame and eventually orchestrate other "AI" processes? | ||
|
|
||
| Therefore, this operational knowledge would be as useless as anything software development related, given the bold assumption that software engineering will be obsolete. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hyphenate the compound modifier software-development-related.
"software development related" modifies "anything" as a compound adjective and should be hyphenated.
✏️ Proposed fix
-Therefore, this operational knowledge would be as useless as anything software development related, given the bold assumption that software engineering will be obsolete.
+Therefore, this operational knowledge would be as useless as anything software-development-related, given the bold assumption that software engineering will be obsolete.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Therefore, this operational knowledge would be as useless as anything software development related, given the bold assumption that software engineering will be obsolete. | |
| Therefore, this operational knowledge would be as useless as anything software-development-related, given the bold assumption that software engineering will be obsolete. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~14-~14: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...useless as anything software development related, given the bold assumption that ...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@posts/2026-02-22-on-ai-orchestration-for-the-long-run.md` at line 14, Change
the compound modifier "software development related" to the hyphenated form
"software-development-related" in the sentence that begins "Therefore, this
operational knowledge..." so the compound adjective correctly modifies
"anything"; locate that exact phrase in the post content and replace it with the
hyphenated version.
|
|
||
| Therefore, this operational knowledge would be as useless as anything software development related, given the bold assumption that software engineering will be obsolete. | ||
|
|
||
| Perhaps, having this operational knowledge today makes sense, and will keep being valuable in the short term, although it's not perfect and magic. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rephrase not perfect and magic for clarity.
"perfect and magic" is an unusual pairing. If the intent is to convey that the knowledge is not a silver bullet, a more idiomatic phrasing would convey that more clearly.
✏️ Proposed fix
-Perhaps, having this operational knowledge today makes sense, and will keep being valuable in the short term, although it's not perfect and magic.
+Perhaps, having this operational knowledge today makes sense, and will keep being valuable in the short term, although it is not a perfect or magical solution.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Perhaps, having this operational knowledge today makes sense, and will keep being valuable in the short term, although it's not perfect and magic. | |
| Perhaps, having this operational knowledge today makes sense, and will keep being valuable in the short term, although it is not a perfect or magical solution. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@posts/2026-02-22-on-ai-orchestration-for-the-long-run.md` at line 16, The
phrase "not perfect and magic" in the sentence "Perhaps, having this operational
knowledge today makes sense, and will keep being valuable in the short term,
although it's not perfect and magic." is awkward; rephrase it to a more
idiomatic alternative such as "although it's not a silver bullet," or "although
it's not perfect or magical," by updating that sentence text to one of these
clearer phrasings to convey the intended meaning; locate the sentence literal in
the post content and replace the phrase accordingly.
Summary by CodeRabbit