Sss 4 opt stabilization to release #20
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request makes extensive modifications across configuration files, layout components, UI elements, internationalization utilities, and integration actions. Changes include updating project keys in configuration, replacing legacy routing and i18n functions with new request and routing modules, and refactoring layout pages in the opt, suite, and web apps. New UI components (e.g., DashboardContent, TripsProvider, TripsContent, TripSearch, TripSections, TripsList, TripStats) and updated SCSS styling are introduced. Interface definitions and types have been enhanced with read-only properties and enums, while integration actions now utilize a centralized executeAction utility for improved error handling and token management. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant ActionFunc as Integration Action Function
participant Exec as executeAction
participant Cookies as Cookies Store
participant Adapter as API Adapter
ActionFunc ->> Exec: Invoke executeAction(callback, actionType)
Exec ->> Cookies: Retrieve auth token
alt Token exists
Exec ->> Adapter: Execute callback with token
Adapter -->> Exec: Return response
Exec -->> ActionFunc: Success response
else Token missing
Exec -->> ActionFunc: Return failure (missing token)
end
sequenceDiagram
participant User as End User
participant TripsPage as Trips Page
participant Provider as TripsProvider
participant Adapter as TripAdapter
participant Consumer as TripsContent
User ->> TripsPage: Navigate to Trips Page
TripsPage ->> Provider: Wrap page with TripsProvider
Provider ->> Adapter: Fetch trips data
Adapter -->> Provider: Return trip list
Provider -->> Consumer: Provide context (trips, loading, error)
Consumer -->> User: Render TripsList with trip cards
Poem
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsErrors were encountered while retrieving linked issues. Errors (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
29-50: LGTM: Well-structured menu items with a suggestion for improvement.The
menuItemsarray is well-defined with clear properties for each item. The use of URI constants is commendable.Consider extracting this array to a separate configuration file for better maintainability, especially if the menu structure grows or needs to be reused elsewhere in the application. For example:
// menuConfig.ts import { OPT_URI, SSS_URI } from '@repo/ui/constants'; export const menuItems = [ { name: 'login', href: SSS_URI + '/login', protected: false, }, // ... other items ]; // Then import in layout.tsx import { menuItems } from './menuConfig';This approach would make the layout file cleaner and the menu configuration more modular.
60-60: LGTM: Navbar props updated correctly with a suggestion for clarity.The use of the spread operator to pass
authenticated,menuItems, andlocaleto the Navbar component is correct and concise.For improved readability and to make it explicit what props are being passed, consider expanding this into individual props:
<Navbar title={'One Plan Trip'} authenticated={authenticated} menuItems={menuItems} locale={locale} />This makes it immediately clear what props the Navbar component expects and receives.
apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
65-65: Approve the prop passing refactor with a suggestion for clarity.The refactoring of prop passing to the
Navbarcomponent using the spread operator is a good improvement. It simplifies the code and makes it more maintainable.For even better clarity, consider destructuring the props object directly in the spread:
- {...{ authenticated, menuItems, locale }} + {...{ authenticated, menuItems, locale } as const}This
as constassertion ensures type safety and makes it explicit which props are being passed.
Line range hint
33-52: Consider optimizing menuItems definition.The
menuItemsarray is currently defined within the component, which means it's recreated on every render. For better performance, especially if this component re-renders frequently, consider moving this array outside the component or memoizing it.Here's a suggested optimization:
const menuItems = [ { name: 'login', href: '/login', protected: false, }, { name: 'register', href: '/register', protected: false, }, { name: 'dashboard', href: '/dashboard', protected: true, }, { name: 'profile', href: '/profile', protected: true, }, ] as const; export default async function RootLayout({ children, params: { locale }, }: PageProps) { // ... rest of the component }This change ensures that
menuItemsis only created once and reused across renders.apps/opt/messages/en.json (2)
2-28: LGTM! Comprehensive and well-structured content for the home section.The new "home" section provides a rich set of localization strings that effectively promote the "One Plan Trip" application. The content is engaging and covers various aspects of the app's features and benefits.
Consider adding a brief description for each feature (feature1 to feature5) to provide more context to users. For example:
"feature1": "Integrated destination planning", "feature1Description": "Plan your entire trip, from flights to activities, in one place.",
36-47: LGTM! Comprehensive footer content with room for minor improvement.The new "footer" section provides a good range of relevant links and information for users. The content covers important aspects such as help resources, destinations, and sustainability.
Consider providing more context for the "coming-soon" entry. It's not clear what this refers to. You could either:
- Remove it if it's not ready to be displayed.
- Add more specific information, e.g., "New features coming soon" or "Mobile app coming soon".
Example:
"coming-soon": "New features coming soon"apps/opt/messages/es.json (2)
2-28: LGTM! Comprehensive and engaging content added.The new "home" section provides a rich set of translations that effectively promote the app's features and benefits. The language is consistent, engaging, and free of apparent errors.
Consider adding an alt text or description for any associated images to improve accessibility. For example:
"feature1ImageAlt": "Icono de mapa y pin para planificación de destinos",
36-46: Great addition of footer content!The new "footer" section provides comprehensive translations for important app information and services. The content is well-structured and covers relevant topics for users.
Consider adding a "privacy-policy" key to ensure users can easily access this important information:
"privacy-policy": "Política de privacidad",apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (3)
13-14: Consider using more descriptive translation keysUsing generic keys like
'title3'and'subtitle2'may reduce code clarity and maintainability. Consider using more meaningful keys that describe the content, such as'homePageTitle'or'welcomeSubtitle'.
15-15: Simplify static href by removing unnecessary template literalsSince
'/dashboard'is a static path, you can simplify the code by removing the template literal syntax.Apply this diff:
- <Link href={`/dashboard`} className="home__button"> + <Link href="/dashboard" className="home__button">
20-20: Improve 'alt' text for better accessibilityConsider providing a more descriptive
alttext for the image to enhance accessibility. Instead of"traveling image", you could use a description that reflects the image content, such as"Illustration representing globalization"or"Globalization animation".
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/messages/en.json (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/messages/es.json (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
66-66: LGTM: Jira project key added successfully.The change to add the
SSSproject key to theknowledge_base.jira.project_keyslist is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. This addition will enable CodeRabbit to integrate with the specified Jira project.To ensure this change is consistent with the PR title and objectives, let's verify:
apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
5-5: LGTM: New imports are appropriate for the changes.The added imports for
auth,OPT_URI, andSSS_URIare correctly placed and align with the new functionality introduced in the component.Also applies to: 8-8
23-24: LGTM: Authentication logic is well-implemented.The authentication logic is concise and effective. The
auth()function is correctly awaited, and theauthenticatedboolean is derived appropriately from the session.Also applies to: 26-27
apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-83: Approve the overall structure and implementation of the RootLayout component.The
RootLayoutcomponent is well-structured and implements several best practices:
- Proper use of Next.js and next-intl for internationalization.
- Efficient handling of authentication and data fetching using async/await.
- Responsive layout with common elements (Navbar, Sidebar, Footer).
- Use of SWRProvider for optimized data management.
The component provides a solid foundation for the application's layout and global state management.
apps/opt/messages/en.json (1)
29-35: LGTM! Navbar translations are accurate and consistent.The "navbar" section has been successfully updated with English translations. The keys remain unchanged, ensuring consistency in the application's structure, while the values now correctly reflect English terminology.
apps/opt/messages/es.json (1)
29-35: Excellent improvements to navbar translations!The updates to the "navbar" section enhance clarity and user experience. The new translations are more descriptive and align well with common Spanish UI conventions.
apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (1)
7-22: 'HomePage' component is properly implementedThe
HomePagecomponent is correctly implemented, utilizinggetTranslationsfor localization and rendering the page content as intended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (1)
11-21: Great improvements to the component structure!The updated structure with new class names and nested divs enhances organization and styling capabilities. The addition of the Link component for navigation and the correct use of the Image component with the 'landing_img' variable are excellent improvements.
Consider adding an aria-label to the Link component for better accessibility:
- <Link href={`/dashboard`} className="home__button"> + <Link href={`/dashboard`} className="home__button" aria-label={t('getStarted')}>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (4)
1-3: LGTM: New imports are appropriate and correctly formatted.The added imports for
getTranslations,Image, andLinkare necessary for the new functionality and are correctly imported from their respective sources.
5-5: Great job fixing the typo in the image import!The variable name has been corrected from 'lading_img' to 'landing_img', addressing the issue raised in the previous review.
7-8: LGTM: Function signature improved.The function has been renamed from 'Web' to 'HomePage', which is more descriptive. The addition of the 'async' keyword is necessary for using 'await' with 'getTranslations'. These changes improve the code's readability and functionality.
8-8: Excellent implementation of localization!The use of
getTranslations('home')to fetch translations and the subsequent use of thetfunction to render translated text is a robust approach to internationalization. This implementation allows for dynamic, localized content, which is crucial for a global user base.Also applies to: 13-14, 16-16
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripGroupInterface.ts (2)
1-11: LGTM! Well-structured interface definition.The
TripGroupinterface is well-defined with clear and appropriate property types. The use of imported types formembersandtripspromotes code reusability and maintainability.Consider adding a blank line before the interface definition for better readability:
import { Trip } from './TripInterface'; import { Member } from './UserInterface'; + export interface TripGroup { id: string; name: string; description: string; createdAt: Date; members: Member[]; trips: Trip[]; }
4-11: Consider additional properties for a more comprehensive TripGroup interfaceThe current interface covers the basic properties of a trip group. Depending on your application's requirements, you might want to consider adding the following properties:
ownerId: string- to track who created or owns the groupmaxMembers?: number- to set an optional limit on the number of membersstatus: 'active' | 'archived' | 'pending'- to track the current status of the groupupdatedAt: Date- to track when the group was last modifiedExample:
export interface TripGroup { readonly id: string; name: string; description?: string; readonly createdAt: Date; updatedAt: Date; ownerId: string; status: 'active' | 'archived' | 'pending'; maxMembers?: number; members: Member[]; trips: Trip[]; }These suggestions aim to make the
TripGroupinterface more robust and flexible. However, only implement them if they align with your application's specific needs and business logic.apps/opt/core/interfaces/UserInterface.ts (1)
1-8: Consider security implications and role managementThe
Userinterface looks good overall, but there are two points to consider:
The
passwordproperty is stored as a string. For security reasons, it's crucial to ensure that this represents a hashed password and not a plain text password. If this interface is used for both input and database representation, consider separating them to avoid exposing the password hash unnecessarily.There's no property for user roles or permissions. Depending on your application's requirements, you might want to add a
roleorpermissionsproperty to facilitate access control.Consider the following modifications:
export interface User { id: string; name: string; email: string; passwordHash: string; // Renamed to clarify it's a hash role: string; // or number, depending on your role system createdAt: Date; updatedAt: Date; }Also, you might want to create separate interfaces for user input (without id, createdAt, updatedAt) and database representation to enhance type safety and prevent accidental exposure of sensitive data.
apps/opt/components/trips/TripActivities.tsx (1)
Line range hint
9-30: Suggestions for component improvementsWhile the main logic of the component remains unchanged, there are a few areas that could be improved:
- The condition for rendering "No Activities, yet" could be more specific:
if (!activities || activities.length === 0) { return <span>No Activities, yet</span>; }
- The "Add activity" button lacks functionality. Consider adding an
onClickhandler:<ActionButton variant="primary" size="small" onClick={handleAddActivity}> <span>Add activity</span> </ActionButton>
- Improve accessibility by adding appropriate ARIA labels and roles:
<div role="region" aria-label="Trip Activities"> <div> <h3 id="activities-heading">Activities</h3> <ActionButton variant="primary" size="small" onClick={handleAddActivity} aria-label="Add activity"> <span>Add activity</span> </ActionButton> </div> <ul aria-labelledby="activities-heading"> {activities.map((activity) => ( <li key={activity.name} className=""> Activity: {activity.name} </li> ))} </ul> </div>These changes would improve the component's functionality, user experience, and accessibility. Would you like me to provide a full refactored version of the component incorporating these suggestions?
packages/ui/styles/components/_trip-progress.scss (3)
4-9: LGTM: Well-structured info section with a minor suggestion.The use of flexbox for layout and
remunits for font size and margins is appropriate. This ensures good responsiveness and accessibility.Consider adding
align-items: center;to ensure vertical alignment of child elements if they have different heights:&__info { display: flex; justify-content: space-between; + align-items: center; margin-bottom: 0.25rem; font-size: 0.875rem; }
11-22: LGTM: Well-structured progress bar with room for improvement.The progress bar is well-defined with appropriate use of
border-radius, fixed height, and overflow handling. The use of SCSS variables for colors is commendable.Consider the following suggestions:
- The complex background gradient could be simplified. If the intention is to create a center line, this could be achieved more efficiently:
&__bar { position: relative; background-color: $ss-gray-lr; &::after { content: ''; position: absolute; top: 0; left: 50%; width: 1px; height: 100%; background-color: $ss-error; } }
- For better responsiveness, consider using
emunits forborder-radiusand height:&__bar { - border-radius: 0.25rem; + border-radius: 0.25em; // ... other properties ... - height: 0.5rem; + height: 0.5em; }These changes would make the component more maintainable and potentially more responsive to font size changes.
23-27: LGTM: Effective use of CSS variable for dynamic progress.The
&__fillrule effectively uses a CSS variable for dynamic width control and ensures full height coverage. The use of an SCSS variable for the background color maintains consistency.For consistency with the parent element, consider using
emunits for any fixed dimensions if you add any in the future. For example, if you decide to add a minimum width:&__fill { background-color: $ss-blue; width: var(--progress-value, 0%); height: 100%; min-width: 0.25em; // Example of using em units }This ensures that the fill scales consistently with its parent element.
apps/opt/components/trips/TripDestinies.tsx (2)
Line range hint
28-28: Improve the safety of the length checkThe current check
destinies.length! > 0uses a non-null assertion, which is unnecessary and potentially unsafe. Consider using a safer approach:{destinies && destinies.length > 0 ? ( // ... existing code ... ) : ( <span>No destinies, yet</span> )}This change ensures that
destiniesis defined before accessing itslengthproperty, preventing potential runtime errors.
Line range hint
1-39: Consider enhancing component reusability and separation of concernsWhile the component's logic is sound, consider the following improvements:
- Extract the "Add destiny" button into a separate component to improve reusability and separation of concerns.
- Consider using a custom hook for navigation logic to make the component more testable and easier to maintain.
- If the list of destinies grows, consider implementing virtualization for better performance.
Example of extracting the "Add destiny" button:
const AddDestinyButton = () => { const router = useRouter(); return ( <ActionButton onClick={() => router.push('/trips/map')} variant="primary" size="small" > <span>Add destiny</span> </ActionButton> ); }; // Then in the TripDestinies component: <div> <h3>Destinies</h3> <AddDestinyButton /> </div>packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_mixins.scss (1)
187-190: LGTM! Consider adding theme support.The new
status-colormixin is a useful addition for setting background and text colors consistently. Its simplicity and clear naming make it easy to use and understand.Consider enhancing the mixin to support theme-specific colors, similar to other mixins in this file. This would ensure consistency with the dark mode support present in other mixins. Here's a suggested implementation:
@mixin status-color($bg-color, $text-color, $dark-bg-color: $bg-color, $dark-text-color: $text-color) { background-color: $bg-color; color: $text-color; [data-theme='dark'] & { background-color: $dark-bg-color; color: $dark-text-color; } }This enhancement would allow specifying different colors for dark mode while maintaining backwards compatibility with the current implementation.
apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1)
105-126: Remove unused commented-out codeThere are commented-out sections of code related to expenses which can clutter the codebase and reduce readability.
Consider removing the commented-out code if it's no longer needed or plan to implement it if it's pending work.
{trip.budget && ( <div className="mt-2"> <div className="trip-list__content"> <span> Budget: ${trip.budget.min} - ${trip.budget.max} </span> - {/* <span>Expenses: ${trip.expenses}</span> */} </div> ... </div> )}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripActivities.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripDestinies.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripGroupInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/UserInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_mixins.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/components/_button.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/components/_card.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/components/_index.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/components/_trip-list.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/components/_trip-progress.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/layouts/_main.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/pages/_dashboard.scss (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (18)
packages/ui/styles/components/_index.scss (1)
1-2: LGTM! Verify new component files exist.The addition of 'trip-list' and 'trip-progress' to the import statement is straightforward and aligns with the PR objectives. This change suggests new UI components have been added to the project, which is consistent with optimization and stabilization efforts.
To ensure the new component files exist, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified!
Both '_trip-list.scss' and '_trip-progress.scss' exist in the
packages/ui/styles/componentsdirectory. The import statement is correct and aligns with the project’s optimization and stabilization objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new SCSS component files exist in the correct directory. # Test: Check if the new SCSS files exist fd -e scss -g '_trip-list.scss' -g '_trip-progress.scss' packages/ui/styles/components # If the files are not found, the script will not produce any output. # In that case, please ensure that the new component files have been created and are in the correct location.Length of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new SCSS component files '_trip-list.scss' and '_trip-progress.scss' exist in the correct directory. # Define the directory DIR="packages/ui/styles/components" # List of required files FILES=("_trip-list.scss" "_trip-progress.scss") # Initialize a flag to track missing files missing=0 # Check each file for file in "${FILES[@]}"; do if [[ ! -f "$DIR/$file" ]]; then echo "Missing file: $file" missing=1 fi done # Exit with status 1 if any files are missing if [[ $missing -eq 1 ]]; then exit 1 fiLength of output: 291
apps/opt/core/interfaces/index.ts (1)
5-6: LGTM! New type exports added correctly.The new export statements for
TripGroupandUsertypes are consistent with the existing pattern in the file and expand the set of available types from this module.To ensure these new exports are being utilized correctly throughout the codebase, please run the following script:
packages/ui/styles/layouts/_main.scss (1)
10-13: Significant layout changes detected. Please verify the intended design.The modifications to
.layout__sectionsuggest a shift from a vertical, top-aligned layout to a horizontal, centered layout with gaps:
- Removed vertical stacking (
flex-direction: columncommented out)- Added horizontal centering (
justify-content: center)- Removed top alignment (
align-items: flex-startcommented out)- Introduced gaps between items (
gap: rem(16))These changes could significantly impact the overall design and user experience. Please consider the following:
- Ensure this new layout is compatible with all screen sizes and content types.
- Verify that related components or styles are updated to maintain consistency.
- Test the changes across different devices and browsers to confirm the desired layout is achieved.
To help verify the impact of these changes, you can run the following script to check for any related layout classes or components that might need updating:
Consider adding responsive breakpoints to adjust the layout for different screen sizes if not already implemented. This will ensure the new centered, horizontal layout works well across devices.
✅ Verification successful
Layout changes localized successfully. No widespread issues detected.
The modifications to
.layout__sectioninpackages/ui/styles/layouts/_main.scssappear to be confined to specific areas:
apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsxapps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsxRecommendations:
Test Affected Layouts:
- Verify the layout rendering in
apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsxandapps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsxto ensure the new styles behave as expected.Ensure Consistency:
- Confirm that the updated styles maintain consistency with the overall design system across different locales and components.
Responsive Design:
- Test the changes across various devices and screen sizes to ensure the centered, horizontal layout with gaps is responsive.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for related layout classes and components echo "Searching for related layout classes:" rg --type scss "layout__" packages/ui/styles echo "\nSearching for components that might use this layout:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "layout__section" packages/ui/componentsLength of output: 385
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for related layout classes and components using file extensions echo "Searching for related layout classes in SCSS files:" rg "layout__" packages/ui/styles --glob "*.scss" echo -e "\nSearching for components that might use this layout in TypeScript and TSX files:" rg "layout__section" packages/ui/components --glob "*.{ts,tsx}"Length of output: 465
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all files and directories related to layout classes and components echo "Searching for directories containing 'components':" fd "components" --type d echo -e "\nSearching for files containing 'layout__section' across the repository:" rg "layout__section" --glob "*.{scss,ts,tsx,js,jsx,html}"Length of output: 734
apps/opt/components/trips/TripActivities.tsx (1)
4-8:⚠️ Potential issueConsider the implications of changing
Activity[]toPartial<Activity>[]While this change increases flexibility by allowing partial
Activityobjects, it introduces potential issues:
- Reduced type safety: The component can no longer assume all
Activityproperties are present.- Potential runtime errors: The component still uses
activity.name(line 26), which may be undefined for some activities.- Possible inconsistency: This change might require updates in how the component is used throughout the application.
Consider the following improvements:
- If partial activities are necessary, update the component logic to handle potentially missing properties:
{activities.map((activity) => ( <p key={activity.name ?? 'unnamed'} className=""> Activity: {activity.name ?? 'Unnamed activity'} </p> ))}
- If all activities should have a name, consider using a more specific type:
type NamedActivity = Pick<Activity, 'name'> & Partial<Omit<Activity, 'name'>>; export const TripActivities = ({ activities, }: { activities: NamedActivity[]; }) => { // ... }This ensures that
nameis always present while allowing other properties to be partial.To assess the impact of this change, let's check how
TripActivitiesis used across the project:This will help determine if the change affects existing usage and if further updates are needed in other parts of the codebase.
packages/ui/styles/components/_trip-progress.scss (2)
1-2: LGTM: Appropriate spacing for the trip progress component.The top margin provides good spacing and isolation for the component. The use of
remunits is suitable for responsive design.
1-29: Overall: Well-structured and maintainable SCSS component with minor improvement opportunities.This new
_trip-progress.scssfile introduces a clear and organized structure for the trip progress component. The use of SCSS nesting, variables, and modern CSS techniques like flexbox and CSS variables is commendable.Key strengths:
- Consistent use of SCSS variables for colors.
- Responsive units (rem) for most dimensions.
- Effective use of flexbox for layout.
- Dynamic progress control using CSS variables.
Areas for potential improvement:
- Simplifying the complex background gradient in the progress bar.
- Enhancing responsiveness by using
emunits consistently.- Adding vertical alignment to the info section.
These minor adjustments could further improve the component's maintainability and responsiveness without significantly altering its core functionality.
apps/opt/components/trips/TripDestinies.tsx (1)
7-11:⚠️ Potential issueConsider the implications of using
Partial<Destiny>[]The change from
Destiny[]toPartial<Destiny>[]increases flexibility but introduces potential issues:
- It allows partial
Destinyobjects, which might lead to runtime errors if required properties are missing.- The usage of
destiny.nameanddestiny.addressin the component is now potentially unsafe.To address these concerns:
- Ensure that this change is intentional and aligns with the overall application design.
- Update the component to handle potentially undefined properties:
{destinies && destinies.length > 0 ? ( destinies.map((destiny, index) => ( <p key={destiny.address ?? index} className=""> Destiny: {destiny.name ?? 'Unknown'} </p> )) ) : ( <span>No destinies, yet</span> )}
- Consider adding runtime checks for required properties if they exist.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check for other usages of the
Destinytype:✅ Verification successful
Verified the update to
Partial<Destiny>[]inTripDestinies.tsxThe change aligns with existing usage patterns in the codebase and handles partial
Destinyobjects appropriately, ensuring type safety and consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of the Destiny type rg --type typescript "Destiny(\[\]|>)" -g '!apps/opt/components/trips/TripDestinies.tsx'Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of the Destiny type in .ts and .tsx files rg "Destiny(\[\]|>)" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '!apps/opt/components/trips/TripDestinies.tsx'Length of output: 641
apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM: New import added correctly.The new import for
TripGroupis correctly placed and necessary for the updatedTripinterface.
29-36: LGTM: Well-defined TripStatus enum.The new
TripStatusenum is a great addition:
- It provides a clear set of possible trip statuses.
- The values cover different stages of a trip's lifecycle.
- Using an enum instead of string literals improves type safety and prevents typos.
- The naming convention for enum values (all uppercase) is consistent with TypeScript best practices.
This change will help maintain consistency and reduce errors when working with trip statuses throughout the application.
packages/ui/styles/components/_button.scss (1)
2-2: Approved: Good addition to prevent text wrapping in buttonsThe addition of
text-wrap: nowrap;to the.buttonclass is a good improvement to ensure consistent button appearance across different text lengths. This change prevents potential layout issues caused by multi-line button text.However, please consider the following:
- Ensure that buttons with long text content don't overflow their containers, especially for smaller screen sizes.
- Test this change with all button sizes (small, medium, large) to confirm it doesn't cause any layout issues.
- Consider adding a max-width or text-overflow property to handle cases where the button text is too long for its container.
To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential issues with long button text and check for existing responsive styles that might need adjustment.
packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_mixins.scss (1)
Line range hint
1-291: Overall assessment: Positive addition to the mixins fileThe introduction of the
status-colormixin enhances the utility of this file without disrupting existing functionality. It provides a concise way to set background and text colors, which aligns well with the purpose of the other mixins in this file. The change is minimal and focused, reducing the risk of unintended side effects on the existing codebase.packages/ui/styles/components/_card.scss (2)
5-6:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the inclusion of mixins
background-color,shadow-sm, andtext-color.Ensure that the mixins
background-color,shadow-sm, andtext-colorare defined in your SCSS codebase or properly imported. Missing mixin definitions can lead to compilation errors.To verify if these mixins are defined, you can run:
Also applies to: 16-16
✅ Verification successful
All specified mixins are correctly defined and included.
- Mixins
background-color,shadow-sm, andtext-colorare defined inpackages/ui/styles/abstracts/_mixins.scss.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if 'background-color', 'shadow-sm', and 'text-color' mixins are defined in the SCSS codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of 'background-color' mixin. rg '@mixin background-color' --type scss # Test: Search for the definition of 'shadow-sm' mixin. rg '@mixin shadow-sm' --type scss # Test: Search for the definition of 'text-color' mixin. rg '@mixin text-color' --type scssLength of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if 'background-color', 'shadow-sm', and 'text-color' mixins are defined in the SCSS codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of 'background-color' mixin. rg '@mixin background-color' -g "*.scss" # Test: Search for the definition of 'shadow-sm' mixin. rg '@mixin shadow-sm' -g "*.scss" # Test: Search for the definition of 'text-color' mixin. rg '@mixin text-color' -g "*.scss"Length of output: 321
4-4:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the use of
rem(250)inmax-width.Ensure that the
rem(250)function is defined and correctly implemented in your SCSS codebase. If not, you may need to replace it with a standard unit like250remor manually convert pixels to rem units.To verify if the
remfunction is defined, you can run the following script:✅ Verification successful
Confirmed: The
remfunction is defined and correctly implemented.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the 'rem' function is defined in the SCSS codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of the 'rem' function. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg '@function rem' --type scssLength of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the 'rem' function is defined in the SCSS codebase. # Test: Search for the definition of the 'rem' function. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg '@function rem' --glob '*.scss'Length of output: 102
packages/ui/styles/pages/_dashboard.scss (5)
2-13: LGTM: Responsive grid layout for stats sectionThe grid layout for the stats section is well-implemented, adjusting the number of columns based on viewport width using media queries. This ensures a responsive design that adapts smoothly across different screen sizes.
16-25: LGTM: Flex layout for search sectionThe use of flexbox for the search section and its form group enhances alignment and spacing of elements. The implementation is correct and promotes a consistent user interface.
27-31: LGTM: Consistent spacing in trip sectionsApplying a bottom margin to each section within
.trip-sectionsensures adequate spacing between components, improving readability and visual appeal.
33-40: LGTM: Styling for section titlesThe styling of
.section-titlewith flex layout, spacing, and font size contributes to a clear and consistent header appearance across sections.
42-49: LGTM: Styling for section messagesThe
.section__messageclass is well-defined with proper padding, border-radius, and text alignment. The inclusion of text and shadow mixins enhances the visual aesthetics and maintains consistency with the overall design.
…iew on core layer : fix types on interface; in integration layer create recursive function to us actions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 36
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (41)
apps/opt/core/interfaces/BudgetInterface.ts (1)
Line range hint
8-8: Remove or translate the Spanish comment.The comment "Asumiendo que tienes una interfaz Currency" (assuming you have a Currency interface) is unnecessary since the Currency interface is defined in this file. If documentation is needed, it should be in English for consistency.
- currency?: Currency; // Asumiendo que tienes una interfaz Currency + currency?: Currency;apps/opt/core/interfaces/ActivityInterface.ts (1)
Line range hint
13-17: Consider using const enum for better type safety.While the current enum implementation is functional, using
const enumcould provide better compile-time guarantees and runtime performance.-enum Priority { +const enum Priority { Low = 'Low', Medium = 'Medium', High = 'High', }apps/suite/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx (2)
Line range hint
12-14: Improve error message text and add i18n support.The current error message "Mmmm... well, sometime this things happens" has several issues:
- Contains grammatical errors ("sometime" should be "sometimes", "things" should be "thing")
- Uses informal language
- Lacks internationalization despite being in a localized route
Consider applying these improvements:
- <h4 className="subtitle--1"> - Mmmm... well, sometime this things happens - </h4> + <h4 className="subtitle--1"> + {t('errors.notFound.message', 'Page not found. The requested page does not exist.')} + </h4>Don't forget to:
- Add the translation key in your locale files
- Import and use your translation function (e.g.,
useTranslationsor similar)
Line range hint
9-11: Consider adding aria-label for better accessibility.The Link wrapping the NotFoundImage should have an aria-label to improve accessibility.
- <Link replace href={'/'}> + <Link replace href={'/'} aria-label="Return to homepage">packages/ui/types/index.ts (1)
21-25: Consider adding documentation and following enum conventions.The
ActionTypeenum is well-structured, but could benefit from some enhancements:Consider applying these improvements:
+/** + * Represents the type of action being performed in activity and budget operations. + */ export enum ActionType { + /** Create a new resource */ CREATE = 'create', + /** Update an existing resource */ UPDATE = 'update', + /** Delete an existing resource */ DELETE = 'delete', }Optional: Consider using uppercase values (
'CREATE','UPDATE','DELETE') to follow common enum conventions.apps/opt/core/interfaces/DestinyInterface.ts (1)
Line range hint
4-16: Consider improving the interface structure and documentation.The current interface structure could be enhanced in several ways:
- Consider grouping location-related fields into a nested structure
- Add JSDoc documentation to describe the interface and its properties
- Consider making location fields consistent in terms of optionality
Here's a suggested refactoring:
/** * Represents a destination location with its associated metadata */ export interface Destiny { readonly id?: UUID; name: string; description?: string; /** Geographic location details */ location: { placeId?: string; address?: string; coordinates: { latitude: number; longitude: number; }; city?: string; state?: string; country?: string; countryCode?: string; continent?: string; }; readonly createdAt?: Date; }apps/opt/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx (1)
Line range hint
12-14: Consider improving the error message and adding internationalization.The current error message has grammatical errors and is hardcoded in English, which doesn't align with the internationalized route structure (
[locale]).Consider:
- Fixing the grammar: "Mmmm... well, sometimes these things happen"
- Moving the text to translation files:
- <h4 className="subtitle--1"> - Mmmm... well, sometime this things happens - </h4> + <h4 className="subtitle--1"> + {t('errors.notFound.message')} + </h4>Don't forget to:
- Import the translation function:
import { useTranslations } from 'next-intl'- Initialize it:
const t = useTranslations()- Add the translation keys to your locale files
apps/web/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx (1)
Line range hint
15-19: Add aria-label to improve accessibility.The back button would benefit from an aria-label to better describe its purpose to screen readers.
- <ActionButton type="icon" onClick={() => back()}> + <ActionButton type="icon" onClick={() => back()} aria-label="Go back to previous page"> <ArrowLeft /> </ActionButton>apps/opt/i18n/request.ts (1)
6-12: Improve type safety and documentation.The current implementation has two areas for improvement:
- The type casting
as anysuggests potential type safety issues- The comment could be more descriptive about the Next.js routing context
Consider applying these improvements:
- // This typically corresponds to the `[locale]` segment. + // This corresponds to the dynamic `[locale]` segment in Next.js routing let locale = await requestLocale; // Ensure that a valid locale is used - if (!locale || !routing.locales.includes(locale as any)) { + if (!locale || !(routing.locales as readonly string[]).includes(locale)) { locale = routing.defaultLocale; }apps/web/i18n/request.ts (1)
5-18: Consider performance optimization for message loading.The current implementation loads messages dynamically on each request. Consider implementing message caching for production environments.
Suggestions:
- Implement a server-side cache for message bundles
- Consider using
React.lazywith Suspense for client-side message loading- Implement message bundle splitting if the translations become large
Would you like me to provide an example implementation of any of these optimizations?
apps/opt/i18n.ts (1)
8-11: Verify type safety for requestLocale parameterWhile the parameter rename is consistent with other files, consider adding type annotations to ensure type safety.
Consider adding types:
- export default getRequestConfig(async ({ requestLocale }) => { + export default getRequestConfig(async ({ requestLocale }: { requestLocale: string | undefined }) => {apps/suite/i18n.ts (1)
8-11: Consider adding error handling for awaitThe
await requestLocaleoperation could potentially throw an error, but there's no error handling in place.- let locale = await requestLocale; + let locale; + try { + locale = await requestLocale; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to get locale:', error); + locale = routing.defaultLocale; + }apps/web/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1)
Line range hint
13-27: Consider adding error handling for invalid locales.While the current implementation works, it might be beneficial to add validation for the
localeparameter to handle cases where an unsupported locale is requested.Here's a suggested implementation:
export default async function RootLayout({ children, params: { locale }, }: PageProps) { + if (!languages.includes(locale)) { + // Either redirect to default locale or show 404 + throw new Error(`Locale ${locale} is not supported`); + } setRequestLocale(locale); const messages = await getMessages(); return ( <html lang="en" suppressHydrationWarning>apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (1)
20-20: Enhance Image component implementationConsider the following improvements for better performance and accessibility:
- Add a height prop to prevent layout shifts
- Provide a more descriptive alt text
- Consider adding a loading strategy
Apply this diff:
- <Image src={landing_img} alt="traveling image" width={550} /> + <Image + src={landing_img} + alt="Illustration of global connectivity and travel" + width={550} + height={550} + priority + />apps/opt/integration/actions/BudgetActions.ts (3)
10-14: Consider adding input validation.The refactoring to use
executeActionimproves error handling consistency. However, consider adding input validation for the budget object before passing it to the adapter.export const createBudget = async (budget: Budget): Promise<ActionResponse> => + // Ensure required budget fields are present + !budget?.amount + ? { success: false, error: 'Invalid budget data' } + : executeAction( (token) => BudgetAdapter.create(budget, token), ActionType.CREATE, );
19-23: Consider validating the id parameter.The refactoring looks good, but consider adding validation for the id parameter to ensure it's a positive number.
export const updateBudget = async ( id: number, budget: Budget, ): Promise<ActionResponse> => + id <= 0 + ? { success: false, error: 'Invalid budget ID' } + : executeAction( (token) => BudgetAdapter.update(id, budget, token), ActionType.UPDATE, );
25-26: Consider validation and maintaining consistent formatting.While the compact syntax is clean, consider:
- Adding id validation as suggested for updateBudget
- Maintaining consistent formatting with other functions for better readability
-export const deleteBudget = async (id: number): Promise<ActionResponse> => - executeAction((token) => BudgetAdapter.delete(id, token), ActionType.DELETE); +export const deleteBudget = async (id: number): Promise<ActionResponse> => + id <= 0 + ? { success: false, error: 'Invalid budget ID' } + : executeAction( + (token) => BudgetAdapter.delete(id, token), + ActionType.DELETE, + );apps/opt/integration/actions/DestinyActions.ts (2)
3-3: Consider relocating ActionType enum to a shared types package.Importing types from a UI package (
@repo/ui/types) in a server-side actions file suggests a potential architectural issue. Types used by both server and client code should typically reside in a shared/common package.Consider creating a shared types package (e.g.,
@repo/shared-typesor@repo/common) and moving theActionTypeenum there.
26-27: Consider maintaining consistent formatting with other actions.While the implementation is correct, consider using the same multi-line formatting as createDestiny and updateDestiny for better consistency and readability.
-export const deleteDestiny = async (id: string): Promise<ActionResponse> => - executeAction((token) => DestinyAdapter.delete(id, token), ActionType.DELETE); +export const deleteDestiny = async ( + id: string, +): Promise<ActionResponse> => + executeAction( + (token) => DestinyAdapter.delete(id, token), + ActionType.DELETE, + );apps/opt/integration/actions/utils.ts (2)
5-5: Consider moving ActionType to a shared types package.Importing types from a UI package into server-side code suggests a potential architectural issue. Consider moving
ActionTypeto a shared types package to maintain better separation of concerns between client and server code.
9-12: Well-structured generic function signature.The type safety is well implemented. Consider adding JSDoc documentation to describe the generic type parameter T and expected callback behavior.
Add documentation like this:
+/** + * Executes an authenticated action with centralized error handling + * @template T The expected return type of the action + * @param actionCallback Function that performs the actual action with the auth token + * @param actionType Type of action being performed for error reporting + * @returns ActionResponse containing either the result or error information + */ export const executeAction = async <T>(apps/suite/utils/index.ts (3)
Line range hint
9-16: Security concern: Cookie is accessible to JavaScript.Setting
httpOnly: falseexposes the authentication token to JavaScript, making it vulnerable to XSS attacks. Consider enablinghttpOnlyto enhance security by preventing client-side access to the token.Apply this diff to fix the security issue:
c.set('auth_token', token, { - httpOnly: false, + httpOnly: true, sameSite: 'lax', path: '/',
Line range hint
7-16: Consider validating the token parameter.The function accepts any string as a token without validation. Consider adding basic validation to ensure the token meets expected format or requirements.
Here's a suggested implementation:
export const createAuthCookie = async (token: string) => { if (!token || typeof token !== 'string' || token.trim().length === 0) { throw new Error('Invalid authentication token'); } const c = await cookies(); c.set('auth_token', token, { httpOnly: true, // ... rest of the configuration }); };
Cookie configuration inconsistencies detected across applications
The verification reveals several inconsistencies in cookie configurations across the codebase:
- In
apps/suite/utils/index.ts, theauth_tokencookie is set withhttpOnly: false- In contrast, both
apps/web/auth.tsandapps/opt/auth.tsset their session cookies withhttpOnly: true- The domain configuration
.17suit.comis consistently used across all files for production, but the security settings differKey concerns:
- Setting
httpOnly: falseexposes the auth token to JavaScript, making it vulnerable to XSS attacks- The same domain is handling cookies with different security configurations, which could lead to security issues
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
9-16: Verify cookie settings across environments.The cookie configuration uses different domains for production and development. Let's verify that these domains align with your application's setup.
Let me try another search strategy to verify the domain configuration.
This should help us understand:
- Environment configurations that might define domains
- Other cookie-related configurations that could validate or conflict with the current settings
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any hardcoded domain references that might need updating # Search for domain references echo "Checking for domain references:" rg -i "17suit\.com|localhost" --type ts --type tsx # Check environment variable usage in next config echo -e "\nChecking Next.js configuration:" fd "next.config" --exec cat {}Length of output: 2649
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for domain-related configurations in environment files and TypeScript files echo "Checking environment files and configurations:" fd -e env -e env.example -e env.local --exec cat {} echo -e "\nChecking for cookie-related configurations:" rg -i "cookie|domain|sameSite|httpOnly" --type ts -A 3 -B 3Length of output: 7303
apps/opt/integration/actions/ActivityActions.ts (2)
27-31: LGTM! Clean implementation with room for enhancement.The function follows the consistent pattern and is appropriately minimal.
Consider adding a soft delete option in the future to prevent accidental data loss, especially if activities are referenced by other entities. This could be implemented by adding an optional
softDeleteparameter:export const deleteActivity = async ( id: number, softDelete: boolean = true ): Promise<ActionResponse> => executeAction( (token) => ActivityAdapter.delete(id, softDelete, token), ActionType.DELETE, );
1-31: Excellent refactoring that improves code maintainability.The centralization of token handling and error management through executeAction is a solid architectural improvement. The consistent pattern across all actions reduces cognitive load and makes the code more maintainable.
Consider adding the following enhancements in future iterations:
- TypeScript discriminated unions for more precise error typing
- Request/Response DTOs to ensure type safety between the adapter and action layers
- Batch operations support for handling multiple activities efficiently
apps/web/middleware.ts (1)
Line range hint
12-17: Consider adding documentation for the regex pattern.The regex pattern is complex and serves multiple purposes. Consider adding a comment explaining its components:
+// Matches URLs with: +// 1. Optional locale prefix: /(en|es) +// 2. Public pages with special handling for root path +// 3. Optional trailing slash const publicPathnameRegex = RegExp( `^(/(${routing.locales.join('|')}))?(${publicPages .flatMap((p) => (p === '/' ? ['', '/'] : p)) .join('|')})/?$`, 'i', );apps/suite/middleware.ts (2)
Line range hint
12-17: Consider improving regex pattern readability.While functionally correct, the regex pattern could be more maintainable. Consider breaking it down into smaller, documented parts.
-const publicPathnameRegex = RegExp( - `^(/(${routing.locales.join('|')}))?(${publicPages - .flatMap((p) => (p === '/' ? ['', '/'] : p)) - .join('|')})/?$`, - 'i', -); +// Build regex parts separately for better readability +const localePattern = `(/(${routing.locales.join('|')}))?`; +const pagesPattern = publicPages + .flatMap((p) => (p === '/' ? ['', '/'] : p)) + .join('|'); + +// Combine patterns with documentation +const publicPathnameRegex = RegExp( + `^${localePattern}(${pagesPattern})/?$`, // Matches: /locale?/path/? + 'i' +);
Line range hint
19-29: Consider separating internationalization and authentication middleware.While the current implementation works well, the middleware handles both internationalization and authentication. Consider splitting these into separate middleware functions for better separation of concerns and easier maintenance.
You could structure it like this:
// Separate middleware functions const handleAuth = (req: NextRequest) => { if (req.auth && req.auth.user) return null; return NextResponse.redirect(new URL('/login', req.url)); }; const handleLocalization = (req: NextRequest) => { return intlMiddleware(req); }; // Compose them in the main middleware export default auth((req) => { const isPublicPage = publicPathnameRegex.test(req.nextUrl.pathname); if (isPublicPage) return handleLocalization(req); const authResult = handleAuth(req); if (authResult) return authResult; return handleLocalization(req); });apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.ts (1)
10-29: Consider breaking down the Trip interface using compositionThe Trip interface is growing large and handles multiple concerns. Consider breaking it down into smaller, focused interfaces.
interface TripBase { readonly id?: UUID; title: string; description: string; readonly createdAt?: Date; userId: string; tripType: TripType; priority: TripPriority; } interface TripDates { startDate?: Date; endDate?: Date; } interface TripGrouping { tripGroupId?: string; shareableLink?: string; qrCode?: string; members?: Partial<Member>[]; tripGroup?: Partial<TripGroup>; } interface TripContent { destinies?: Partial<Destiny>[]; activities?: Partial<Activity>[]; } export interface Trip extends TripBase, TripDates, TripGrouping, TripContent { status?: TripStatus; budgetId?: number; budget?: Budget; }apps/opt/store/tripStore.ts (2)
Line range hint
24-31: Consider adding validation for required trip properties.The initial state allows empty strings for critical properties like
title,description, anduserId. Consider adding validation in the setters or using a validation library to ensure data integrity.Example improvement:
interface TripActions { setTrip: (trip: Trip) => void; // Add validation validateTrip: (trip: Trip) => boolean; } // Implementation validateTrip: (trip) => { if (!trip.title.trim() || !trip.userId.trim()) { throw new Error('Title and userId are required'); } return true; }, setTrip: (trip) => { if (validateTrip(trip)) { set({ trip }); } },
Line range hint
46-47: Consider adding migration strategy for persisted data.The store uses persistence without a version control strategy. This could cause issues when the store structure changes in future updates.
Consider adding version control to the persist middleware:
persist( (set) => ({ // ... existing implementation }), { name: 'trip-storage', version: 1, migrate: (persistedState: any, version: number) => { if (version === 0) { // Migrate from version 0 to 1 return { ...persistedState, // Add migration logic } } return persistedState; }, } ),apps/opt/components/UI/StepperFlow.tsx (1)
Line range hint
11-11: Consider improving type safety and internationalization.While not directly related to the current changes, here are some suggestions to improve the code:
- Replace
anytype with a proper interface for steps- Use proper type guards instead of non-null assertions
- Use translation keys for the "Volver" text since we're moving towards i18n
Consider applying these improvements:
interface Step { component: React.ReactNode; // add other relevant properties } interface StepperFlowProps { steps: Step[]; } export default function StepperFlow({ steps }: StepperFlowProps) { // ... rest of the code ... // Replace hard-coded text with translation {t('common.back')} // Instead of "Volver"Also applies to: 52-54
apps/suite/components/auth/RegisterForm.tsx (2)
Line range hint
52-54: Fix typo in Google sign-in button text.The button text contains a typo: "Sing in" should be "Sign in".
onClick={() => signIn('google', { redirectTo: '/dashboard' })} > - <Google /> Sing in + <Google /> Sign in </ActionButton>
Line range hint
82-84: Consider internationalizing the static text.The link text "Have an account?, click to Sign in" is hardcoded. Consider using a translation key for better i18n support, especially since the codebase is moving towards better internationalization with the new routing setup.
- <Link className="form__link" href="/login"> - Have an account?, click to Sign in + <Link className="form__link" href="/login"> + {t('auth.register.login_link')} </Link>apps/suite/components/auth/LoginForm.tsx (3)
Line range hint
38-40: Consider adding error handling for the Google sign-in.The Google sign-in implementation could benefit from error handling to improve user experience.
Consider updating the code to handle potential errors:
<ActionButton type="full" - onClick={() => signIn('google', { redirectTo: '/dashboard' })} + onClick={() => signIn('google', { + redirectTo: '/dashboard', + callbackUrl: '/dashboard' + }).catch((error) => { + console.error('Google sign-in failed:', error); + // Handle error appropriately + })} >
Line range hint
31-35: Consider adding loading state feedback for password reset.The password field reset after a failed login attempt could benefit from visual feedback.
Consider updating the code to show loading state during reset:
const onSubmit = async (data: { email: string; password: string }) => { await login(data); // Llama al hook para realizar la autenticación if (!errors.password) { + // Show loading state while resetting resetField('password'); // Resetea el campo de contraseña en caso de error } };
Line range hint
89-91: Fix typo in registration link text.The registration link text contains grammatical errors.
Apply this correction:
- Not have account yet?, click to Sign up + Don't have an account yet? Click to sign upapps/opt/messages/es-ES.json (1)
36-47: Consider more natural translations for certain terms.While most translations are good, some could be more idiomatic in Spanish:
- "for-travel-partners": "Para socios de viaje", + "for-travel-partners": "Para empresas colaboradoras",This change better reflects the business context in Spanish-speaking markets.
apps/opt/components/trips/CustomMapControl.tsx (1)
Line range hint
89-96: Improve toast handling in save operation.The current placement of
toast.dismiss()might lead to unintended dismissal of error/success toasts. Consider moving it to ensure proper feedback visibility.Apply this diff for better toast handling:
const handleSaveDestiny = async () => { - toast.loading('Saving destiny...'); + const loadingToast = toast.loading('Saving destiny...'); const newDestiny: Destiny = destinyMapper(destiny!); const { isError } = await action(updateTrip, [ trip.id, { ...trip, destinies: [...trip.destinies!, newDestiny] }, ]); - toast.dismiss(); + toast.dismiss(loadingToast); if (isError) { toast.error(isError); return; } toast.success('Destiny saved successfully!');apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1)
3-24: Consider organizing imports by categoryThe imports could be better organized into categories (external dependencies, internal utilities, components) for better maintainability.
// External dependencies import { ArrowRight, Calendar, // ... other icons } from 'lucide-react'; import { useFormatter } from 'next-intl'; import { useState } from 'react'; // Internal utilities and types import { Trip, TripStatus } from '@opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface'; import { useRouter } from '@opt/i18n/routing'; import { TripAdapter } from '@opt/integration/adapters'; import { createTripsHooks } from '@opt/integration/hooks'; // Components import { ActionButton, InputField } from '@repo/ui';
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (66)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/[id]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/UI/StepperFlow.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/CustomMapControl.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/ActivityInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/BudgetInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/DestinyInterface.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripGroupInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/UserInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/i18n.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/i18n/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/i18n/routing.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/integration/actions/ActivityActions.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/integration/actions/BudgetActions.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/integration/actions/DestinyActions.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/integration/actions/TripActions.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/integration/actions/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/messages/en-US.json (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/messages/es-ES.json (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/middleware.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/navigations.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/opt/next-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/next.config.js (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/package.json (3 hunks)
- apps/opt/store/tripStore.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/components/Footer.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/components/auth/LoginForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/components/auth/RegisterForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/components/auth/SignOutButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/core/auth/hooks/useLogin.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/core/auth/hooks/useRegister.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/i18n.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/i18n/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/i18n/routing.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/middleware.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/navigations.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/suite/next-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/next.config.js (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/package.json (2 hunks)
- apps/suite/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/i18n.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/i18n/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/i18n/routing.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/middleware.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/navigations.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/web/next-env.d.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/next.config.js (1 hunks)
- apps/web/package.json (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/config.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/ui/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_functions.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_mixins.scss (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/components/_sidebar.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/layouts/_main.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- apps/opt/navigations.ts
- apps/suite/navigations.ts
- apps/web/navigations.ts
- packages/ui/config.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripCard.tsx
- apps/opt/messages/en-US.json
- apps/opt/next-env.d.ts
- apps/suite/core/auth/hooks/useLogin.ts
- apps/suite/core/auth/hooks/useRegister.ts
- apps/suite/next-env.d.ts
- apps/web/next-env.d.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripGroupInterface.ts
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx
- packages/ui/styles/layouts/_main.scss
🔇 Additional comments (87)
apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/[id]/page.tsx (2)
5-5: LGTM: Component rendering is correct.The
TripDetailscomponent is correctly rendered with the id prop.
1-5: Verify component usage and page structure.Let's ensure consistency across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the TripDetails component since we couldn't find its interface in the previous search.
Component usage and page structure are consistent
The verification shows:
- TripDetails component correctly accepts an
idprop of type string- The page structure follows Next.js patterns with async server components
- The component is properly imported and used with the required prop
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check TripDetails component props interface ast-grep --pattern 'interface TripDetailsProps { $$$ }' # Check other Next.js page components structure fd --type f 'page.tsx' --exec rg -A 5 'export default (async )?function'Length of output: 2014
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for TripDetails component definition and usage ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function TripDetails' # Find all usages of TripDetails rg "TripDetails" -A 3 # Look for any prop type definitions related to TripDetails rg "type.*TripDetails|interface.*TripDetails" -A 3Length of output: 1434
apps/opt/core/interfaces/BudgetInterface.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good improvement in type safety.Making the
idproperty readonly prevents accidental modifications after initialization while maintaining its optional nature for new entities.
Line range hint
1-8: Verify consistency of ID types across interfaces.The
Budgetinterface usesnumberfor its ID while according to the summary, theTripinterface usesUUID. Consider standardizing the ID types across interfaces for consistency.Let's check the ID types used across interfaces:
apps/opt/core/interfaces/ActivityInterface.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good practice making identifiers and timestamps immutable.Making
idandcreatedAtreadonly enforces data integrity by preventing accidental modifications to these critical fields. This aligns with database behavior where primary keys and creation timestamps should remain constant throughout an entity's lifecycle.Also applies to: 5-5
Line range hint
1-12: Verify readonly consistency across related interfaces.Let's ensure that the readonly pattern is consistently applied across related interfaces.
✅ Verification successful
readonlyproperties are consistently applied across related interfacesThe verification shows that
readonlymodifiers are consistently applied to bothidandcreatedAtproperties across all related interfaces:
Activity: Hasreadonly idandreadonly createdAtTripGroup: Hasreadonly idandreadonly createdAtMember: Hasreadonly id(no createdAt property)🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if id and createdAt are consistently marked as readonly across interfaces # Expected: All related interfaces should have readonly id and createdAt properties # Search for interface definitions with id and createdAt properties ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$ id: $_ $$$ createdAt: $_ $$$ }' # Search for readonly properties in interfaces ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ { $$$ readonly $_: $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 3126
packages/ui/types/index.ts (1)
12-12: LGTM! Verify the optional id parameter usage.The addition of an optional
idparameter is well-typed and maintains backward compatibility.Let's verify how this parameter is being used across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Optional
idparameter is safely implementedThe verification shows that:
Paramstype is only used within the UI package's type system- It's consistently used in
PagePropsandPageParamsinterfaces- The optional
idparameter maintains backward compatibility since:
- It's marked as optional with
?- The only required field remains
locale: 'es' | 'en'- Both parent interfaces (
PagePropsandPageParams) use the type as-is🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage patterns of the Params type to ensure the optional id is handled correctly ast-grep --pattern 'params: Params'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different approaches to find Params usage: # 1. Search for type imports rg "import.*\{.*Params.*\}" -g "*.ts*" # 2. Search for Params type references rg ":\s*Params\b" -g "*.ts*" # 3. Search for type declarations using Params rg "extends\s+Params\b" -g "*.ts*" # 4. Look at the actual type definition file to understand context cat packages/ui/types/index.tsLength of output: 593
apps/opt/core/interfaces/UserInterface.ts (2)
1-6: Consider enhancing the Member interface with documentation and consistent types.The previous review comments about improving the Member interface are still valid. Additionally:
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the interface and its properties
- The
roleIdas a number might be limiting if you need to support UUID strings for rolesAdd documentation and consider this implementation:
+/** + * Represents a base member in the system + */ export interface Member { + /** Unique identifier for the member */ readonly id: string; + /** Full name of the member */ name: string; + /** Email address of the member */ email: string; + /** Role identifier (consider using string for UUID compatibility) */ - roleId: number; + roleId: string; + /** Timestamp when the member was created */ + readonly createdAt: Date; }
17-19: Verify Guest interface completeness.The Guest interface seems minimal. Consider whether additional fields might be needed:
- Expiration date for guest access
- Invitation status
- Who created/invited the guest
Let's check if there are any guest-related features in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Guest interface appears appropriately minimal and complete
Based on the codebase analysis, the Guest interface is correctly designed as a simple extension of the Member interface. The Member interface already includes essential fields (id, name, email, roleId), and the Guest interface appropriately adds only the
createdAttimestamp. There's no evidence of additional guest-specific functionality (like invitations or expiration dates) being used in the codebase that would warrant extending the interface.The role-based access control is handled through the
roleIdfield inherited from Member, making additional guest-specific access control fields unnecessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for guest-related functionality echo "Searching for guest-related code..." rg -l "guest" --type ts # Search for invitation-related code echo "Searching for invitation handling..." rg -l "invit(e|ation)" --type tsLength of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a more comprehensive search for guest-related code echo "Searching for Guest interface usage and implementation..." rg -i "guest" --type ts -A 5 # Search for Member interface to understand the base functionality echo "Searching for Member interface definition..." ast-grep --pattern 'interface Member { $$$ }' # Search for any authentication or user type handling echo "Searching for user type or role handling..." rg -i "usertype|role|access" --type ts -A 3Length of output: 2020
apps/opt/core/interfaces/DestinyInterface.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM! Good immutability practices.Making
idandcreatedAtreadonly is a good practice as these fields should not be modified after creation. The optional nature of these fields also appropriately supports entity creation scenarios.Also applies to: 16-16
apps/opt/i18n/routing.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are correctly structured.The necessary functions are imported from their respective next-intl submodules.
4-14: Consider revising locale prefix configuration.The current configuration has potential issues:
- The URL prefixes ('/en', '/es') don't match their corresponding locale codes ('en-US', 'es-ES'), which could lead to confusion.
- Using
mode: 'always'enforces locale prefixes in all URLs, which might:
- Break existing bookmarks and links
- Impact SEO if not properly handled with canonical URLs
Let's check for existing URLs that might be affected:
Consider these alternatives:
- Match URL prefixes with locale codes: '/en-US' and '/es-ES'
- Use
mode: 'as-needed'to maintain backward compatibility- Add proper canonical URL tags for SEO
apps/suite/i18n/routing.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are correctly specified.The necessary next-intl utilities are properly imported.
16-17: ```shell
#!/bin/bashLet's check the actual usage patterns in files that import these utilities
echo "Checking usage patterns in files importing navigation utilities..."
Check a sample of files to see how they're using the navigation utilities
for file in "apps/opt/components/trips/TripCard.tsx" "apps/opt/components/UI/StepperFlow.tsx" "apps/suite/components/auth/LoginForm.tsx" "apps/opt/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx"; do
echo -e "\nFile: $file"
echo "----------------------------------------"
rg -A 2 "useRouter|usePathname|Link" "$file"
doneAlso check if there are any direct imports from next/navigation which should use our routing instead
echo -e "\nChecking for potentially incorrect next/navigation imports..."
rg "from ['"]next/navigation['"]"</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>apps/web/i18n/routing.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `4-14`: **Verify the locale prefix mapping strategy.** The locale codes ('en-US', 'es-ES') use full IETF language tags, but the URL prefixes ('/en', '/es') use only the language part. While this works, it might cause issues if you need to support multiple variants of the same language in the future (e.g., 'en-US' vs 'en-GB'). Consider either: 1. Using full locale codes in URL prefixes for consistency: ```diff prefixes: { - 'en-US': '/en', - 'es-ES': '/es', + 'en-US': '/en-US', + 'es-ES': '/es-ES', },
- Or simplifying locale codes to match URL prefixes:
- locales: ['en-US', 'es-ES'], - defaultLocale: 'en-US', + locales: ['en', 'es'], + defaultLocale: 'en', localePrefix: { mode: 'always', prefixes: { - 'en-US': '/en', - 'es-ES': '/es', + 'en': '/en', + 'es': '/es', }, },
16-17: LGTM! Clean export of navigation utilities.The destructuring of navigation utilities from
createNavigationis well-structured and provides all necessary routing primitives.apps/opt/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Import path change aligns with the codebase reorganization.The update to use
@opt/i18n/routingis consistent with similar changes across other components, improving the organization of internationalization-related routing functionality.apps/web/app/[locale]/not-found.tsx (1)
5-5: Verify the correct import path.The import path
@web/i18n/routingdiffers from what's mentioned in the summary (@opt/i18n/routing). Please verify that this is the intended path.apps/suite/components/auth/SignOutButton.tsx (1)
12-13: LGTM! Async cookie handling is more robust.The change to use async cookie store access is a good improvement for more reliable cookie management.
apps/opt/i18n/request.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Import statements are well-structured.The imports are properly organized with external dependencies first, followed by internal imports.
16-16: Enhance security against path traversal.While the locale is validated against a whitelist, it's recommended to add additional path sanitization to prevent any potential path traversal attempts.
Let's verify the messages directory structure:
apps/suite/i18n/request.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are well-structured.The imports correctly separate external package dependencies from local module imports.
16-16: Verify the security of dynamic imports.The dynamic import path construction could potentially lead to path traversal if not properly validated.
✅ Verification successful
Dynamic import is properly secured with locale validation
The implementation is secure because:
- The
localeparameter is explicitly validated against a predefined list of allowed locales (routing.locales)- If validation fails, it falls back to a default locale
- The
localesarray inrouting.tscontains only two specific values:['en-US', 'es-ES']- These exact locale files exist in the messages directory as verified earlier
- The path construction is limited to these validated values, preventing path traversal
The dynamic import pattern used here follows security best practices by validating input before use.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and structure of locale files # Test 1: Check if messages directory exists and list its contents echo "Checking messages directory structure:" fd -t f -e json . "apps/suite/messages" # Test 2: Verify that routing.ts defines the expected locales echo -e "\nChecking locale definitions in routing.ts:" rg "locales.*=.*\[.*\]" "apps/suite/i18n/routing.ts"Length of output: 342
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify how the locale parameter is validated before being used in the import # Check the implementation of the request.ts file echo "Checking request.ts implementation:" cat "apps/suite/i18n/request.ts" # Check if there's any locale validation in routing.ts echo -e "\nChecking locale validation in routing.ts:" cat "apps/suite/i18n/routing.ts"Length of output: 1145
apps/web/i18n/request.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are well-structured.The imports follow good practices by separating external and internal dependencies.
16-16: Verify message file existence across locales.Ensure that message files exist for all supported locales to prevent runtime errors.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the locales and message files.
This script will help us:
- Locate the routing configuration file
- Find all existing message files
- Extract the locales configuration directly
Let's check the content of the routing files and messages directory specifically for the web app since the file under review is in
apps/web/.
Message files exist for all configured locales
The verification confirms that message files exist for both configured locales:
- Configured locales in
routing.ts:en-USandes-ES- Message files present in
apps/web/messages/:en-US.jsonandes-ES.json🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if message files exist for all configured locales # First, extract the locales configuration echo "Checking message files for configured locales..." ast-grep --pattern 'export const routing = { locales: [$$$] }' | grep -o '\[[^]]*\]' | while read -r locales; do # For each locale in the configuration echo "$locales" | tr -d '[]' | tr ',' '\n' | while read -r locale; do locale=$(echo "$locale" | tr -d "' \"") if [ ! -z "$locale" ]; then # Check if the corresponding message file exists if ! fd -p "messages/${locale}.json" .; then echo "Warning: Missing message file for locale: $locale" fi fi done doneLength of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's find the routing configuration file echo "Looking for routing configuration..." fd -e ts -e js routing # Then let's look for message files echo -e "\nLooking for message files..." fd -p "messages/*.json" # Let's also check the content of any routing configuration files echo -e "\nChecking routing configuration content..." rg "locales.*=.*\[" -A 1Length of output: 409
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the web app's routing configuration echo "Web app routing configuration:" cat apps/web/i18n/routing.ts # List message files in web app echo -e "\nWeb app message files:" ls -la apps/web/messages/ # Check if messages directory exists echo -e "\nChecking messages directory structure:" find apps/web/ -type d -name messagesLength of output: 975
apps/opt/i18n.ts (1)
19-22: Complete the configuration objectThe configuration object appears incomplete with a trailing comment. The
...suggests there might be missing configuration options that need to be specified.Let's check what other configuration options might be needed:
Would you like me to help complete the configuration object with the necessary options?
apps/web/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
3-3: Good migration to stable API!Updating from
unstable_setRequestLocaletosetRequestLocaleis a positive change as it moves to the stable API version of next-intl.
17-17: LGTM! Function usage updated consistently.The usage of
setRequestLocaleis correctly updated to match the new stable API import.apps/suite/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM: Import change aligns with i18n restructuringThe updated import source reflects the centralization of routing functionality with i18n capabilities.
apps/web/package.json (3)
27-27: LGTM: ESLint config version matches Next.js.The eslint-config-next version is correctly synchronized with the Next.js version.
6-6: Verify Turbopack stability for production use.The
--turboflag enables Next.js Turbopack which is still in beta. While it offers improved development performance, ensure your team is aware of potential stability issues.✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about Turbopack usage and configuration across the codebase.
Turbopack usage is consistent across Next.js apps in the monorepo
The
--turboflag is already being used consistently in all Next.js applications within the monorepo (suite, web, and opt), indicating this is an intentional architectural decision. The project also uses Turborepo for build system orchestration, suggesting a well-established integration with Vercel's tooling.
apps/suite/package.json: Uses--turboflag on port 3001apps/opt/package.json: Uses--turboflag on port 3002apps/web/package.json: Uses--turboflag on port 3003🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any Turbopack-related issues or warnings in the codebase rg -i "turbopack|turbo" . --type mdLength of output: 770
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any Turbopack configurations or usage in the codebase rg -i "turbopack|turbo" --type=json -A 2 -B 2 # Check Next.js version in other apps to see if Turbopack is consistently used fd package.json --exec grep -A 1 -B 1 '"dev":'Length of output: 2421
14-14: Major version upgrade requires careful migration.Upgrading from Next.js 14 to 15 is a major version bump that may include breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All breaking changes have been addressed
- The application has been thoroughly tested
- The team is aware of the migration requirements
✅ Verification successful
Next.js 15 upgrade appears safe to proceed
The codebase analysis shows:
- Only using stable Next.js features: Image component and cookies API
- No usage of deprecated data fetching methods (getInitialProps, getServerSideProps, etc.)
- No usage of deprecated next/head component
- All apps (web, suite, opt) and the UI package are already aligned to use Next.js 15.0.1
The upgrade appears to be already implemented across all packages with compatible dependencies (React 18.3.1). The codebase is using modern Next.js patterns and no deprecated APIs were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for Next.js specific patterns that might need updates # Check for potential breaking changes in app router, server components, etc. rg -l 'getInitialProps|getServerSideProps|getStaticProps|getStaticPaths|next/head|next/image'Length of output: 576
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual usage of these patterns to understand the impact echo "=== Checking Next.js Image usage ===" rg "next/image" -B 2 -A 2 echo -e "\n=== Checking Data Fetching Patterns ===" rg "getInitialProps|getServerSideProps|getStaticProps|getStaticPaths" -B 2 -A 2 echo -e "\n=== Checking Next.js Head usage ===" rg "next/head" -B 2 -A 2 echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json for current Next.js version ===" fd "package.json" --exec grep -l "next\":" {} \; --exec cat {}Length of output: 8738
apps/suite/next.config.js (2)
Line range hint
8-29: LGTM! Webpack and SASS configurations are well structured.The configuration maintains good practices:
- Proper alias handling for react-native-web
- Comprehensive file extension resolution
- Clear SASS path configuration
4-4: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify the existence of the request.ts file and consider using path.resolve.
While the change to specify the request handler is good, let's ensure it's properly configured:
Consider using path.resolve for better path resolution across different environments:
- const withNextIntl = createNextIntlPlugin('./i18n/request.ts'); + const withNextIntl = createNextIntlPlugin(path.resolve(__dirname, './i18n/request.ts'));apps/suite/package.json (2)
6-6: Verify the impact of enabling turbo mode.The addition of the
--turboflag enables Next.js's experimental Turbopack compiler. While this can significantly improve development performance, please ensure:
- All developers are aware of this change
- Development workflows and debugging capabilities are not adversely affected
14-14: Review Next.js 15 migration guide.The upgrade from Next.js 14 to 15 is a major version change that may include breaking changes. Please ensure:
- All breaking changes have been addressed
- Required migrations have been completed
- The upgrade has been tested across all affected applications (opt, web, and suite)
Also applies to: 27-27
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to check for specific Next.js 14 to 15 breaking changes and migration requirements.
These scripts will help us verify:
- Image component usage that might be affected by breaking changes
- Font loading changes
- App Router implementation details
- Middleware implementations
- Configuration changes that might need updates
Next.js 15 upgrade appears safe to proceed
Based on the analysis of the codebase:
- All apps (opt, web, and suite) consistently use Next.js 15.0.1 and its corresponding eslint-config
- The codebase uses the App Router pattern with proper page/layout structure
- Image component usage is standard and doesn't use deprecated patterns
- Middleware implementations follow the current pattern
- next.config.js files use supported configurations
- No usage of deprecated features like getStaticProps/getServerSideProps
- No direct usage of next/font that might be affected by breaking changes
The upgrade appears safe as the codebase already follows modern Next.js patterns and doesn't use features with breaking changes in version 15.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for potential Next.js 14 specific features that might need migration rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!*.json' -g '!*.md' "appDir|getStaticProps|getServerSideProps|getInitialProps" # Check if all related Next.js packages are on the same version across the monorepo echo "Checking Next.js related package versions across the monorepo:" fd package.json --exec grep -l "next\|eslint-config-next" {} | xargs catLength of output: 4163
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usage of Image component and its props rg -g '!node_modules' "next/image|next/legacy/image" -A 2 # Check for usage of next/font rg -g '!node_modules' "next/font" # Check for app router specific features fd "page.tsx|layout.tsx|loading.tsx|error.tsx" --exec grep -l "export default" # Check for usage of middleware fd "middleware.ts" --type f # Check for usage of next.config.js fd "next.config" --type f --exec cat {}Length of output: 6005
apps/web/next.config.js (1)
4-4: Verify i18n configuration path exists.The change looks good, but let's verify the i18n setup is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
✓ i18n configuration path is valid and properly structured
The path
./i18n/request.tsinnext.config.jsis correct and the file exists atapps/web/i18n/request.ts. The i18n setup appears to be properly structured with all necessary files:
apps/web/i18n/request.ts(the referenced file)apps/web/i18n/routing.tsapps/web/i18n.ts🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of i18n configuration files and their structure # Check if the i18n directory and request.ts exist echo "Checking i18n setup..." fd -t f "request.ts" "i18n" # Check if the routing configuration exists (mentioned in the AI summary) echo "Checking routing configuration..." fd -t f "routing.ts" "i18n" # Look for locale files structure echo "Checking locale files structure..." fd -t f . "i18n" -e jsonLength of output: 563
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try searching from the repository root with relative path to apps/web/i18n echo "Checking i18n setup in apps/web..." fd -t f "request.ts" "apps/web" # Let's also check the content of next.config.js to understand the context better echo "Checking next.config.js content..." cat apps/web/next.config.js # Search for any i18n related files in the project echo "Searching for i18n related files..." fd -t f . -e ts -e js | grep -i "i18n"Length of output: 1320
apps/opt/integration/actions/TripActions.ts (5)
4-4: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are properly structured with types from shared packages and local utilities clearly separated.
Also applies to: 8-8
22-23: LGTM! Consistent implementation pattern.The deleteTrip implementation maintains consistency with other methods in error handling and token management.
Let's verify the TripAdapter.delete interface matches the usage:
#!/bin/bash # Verify TripAdapter.delete method signature ast-grep --pattern 'class TripAdapter { $$$ delete(id: string, token: string) { $$$ } $$$ }'
13-20: LGTM! Well-formatted implementation.The multi-line formatting improves readability while maintaining consistent error handling through executeAction.
Let's verify the TripAdapter.update interface matches the usage:
#!/bin/bash # Verify TripAdapter.update method signature ast-grep --pattern 'class TripAdapter { $$$ update(id: string, trip: Trip, token: string) { $$$ } $$$ }'
10-23: Verify test coverage for the refactored implementations.The refactoring looks great and improves code maintainability. Please ensure that tests have been updated to cover these changes, particularly error scenarios now handled by executeAction.
Let's check for test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Look for test files covering TripActions fd "TripActions\.(test|spec)\.(ts|tsx)$"
10-11: LGTM! Clean implementation using executeAction.The refactored implementation properly delegates token and error handling to the utility function.
Let's verify the TripAdapter interface matches the usage:
✅ Verification successful
The TripAdapter interface matches the usage perfectly
The implementation in
apps/opt/integration/adapters/TripAdapter.tsshows thatTripAdapter.createhas the exact signature being used:create: async (trip: Trip, token: string): Promise<Trip>This matches perfectly with how it's being used in the
createTripaction, where:
- The
tripparameter is passed directly- The
tokenparameter is provided byexecuteAction- The return type is properly wrapped in the
ActionResponsebyexecuteAction🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify TripAdapter.create method signature ast-grep --pattern 'class TripAdapter { $$$ create(trip: Trip, token: string) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 314
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find TripAdapter implementation rg "class TripAdapter" -A 10 # Also search for any create method in TripAdapter rg "TripAdapter.*create" -A 3Length of output: 367
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's search for TripAdapter in all TypeScript files fd -e ts -e tsx --exec grep -l "TripAdapter" # Then let's look at the content of files that mention TripAdapter fd -e ts -e tsx --exec grep -l "TripAdapter" | xargs catLength of output: 14667
apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx (3)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-structuredThe imports are properly organized and use correct package references for the monorepo structure.
7-8: LGTM! Component setup follows Next.js best practicesThe async server component pattern is correctly implemented with server-side translations.
15-17: Verify locale handling in Link componentThe href doesn't include the current locale parameter, which might be necessary for proper i18n routing.
Let's check how other components handle locale routing:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the findings from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Link component locale handling is managed by middleware
The codebase uses
next-intlmiddleware which automatically handles locale routing for all pages. The middleware is properly configured to intercept and process all non-static routes, including the dashboard route. The Link component doesn't need explicit locale handling as it's managed transparently by the middleware.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Link usage patterns in the codebase rg -A 2 "from '@opt/i18n/routing'" | rg -A 2 "<Link"Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Link usage patterns in the codebase, focusing on locale-related paths rg -A 2 '<Link.*href=.*locale.*>' --type tsx --type jsx # Also search for any i18n routing utility functions or hooks rg -l "export.*getLocale|useLocale" --type ts --type tsx # Look for Link components in files under [locale] directories fd '\[locale\]' -t d -x rg -A 2 '<Link' {} \;Length of output: 1556
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any locale-related utilities or configurations in the project rg "useLocale|getLocale|i18n.*config" # Also check for any middleware handling of locale fd middleware -t f -x cat {} \;Length of output: 2877
apps/opt/integration/actions/BudgetActions.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM! Import statements are well-organized.The new imports for
ActionTypeandexecuteActionare properly structured and align with the centralized error handling approach.Also applies to: 8-8
8-8: Verify consistent implementation across action files.Let's ensure the executeAction utility is properly implemented and consistently used across other action files.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation verified and consistently used across action files
The
executeActionutility is properly implemented inutils.tsand is consistently used across all action files (BudgetActions, TripActions, DestinyActions, ActivityActions) following the same pattern for CRUD operations. Each action file:
- Correctly imports
executeActionfrom './utils'- Uses it with the appropriate adapter and action type
- Maintains consistent error handling through the utility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check implementation and usage of executeAction utility # Check executeAction implementation echo "Checking executeAction implementation:" rg -A 10 "export const executeAction" # Check consistent usage pattern across action files echo "\nChecking usage pattern in other action files:" fd -e ts -e tsx --full-path "actions" --exec rg -l "executeAction"Length of output: 1351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual usage pattern in each action file to verify consistency echo "Checking executeAction usage patterns in action files:" for file in $(fd -e ts -e tsx --full-path "actions" --exec rg -l "executeAction"); do if [[ "$file" != *"utils.ts" ]]; then echo "\nFile: $file" rg "executeAction" "$file" -A 2 -B 2 fi doneLength of output: 4262
apps/opt/package.json (3)
6-6: Consider the stability implications of --turbo flag.While the Turbo mode can improve development performance, it's still in beta and might introduce instability. Consider providing documentation for the team about:
- How to disable turbo mode if issues arise
- Known limitations or gotchas
- Troubleshooting steps
30-30: LGTM! ESLint config version matches Next.js.The eslint-config-next version has been correctly updated to match the Next.js version.
17-17: Verify Next.js 15 upgrade implications.This is a major version upgrade from Next.js 14 to 15. Please ensure you've reviewed the migration guide and tested the following potential breaking changes:
- App Router changes
- Image Component modifications
- Server Actions updates
apps/opt/integration/actions/DestinyActions.ts (3)
10-15: LGTM! Clean implementation of createDestiny action.The function effectively uses the new executeAction pattern while maintaining type safety and proper error handling delegation.
17-24: LGTM! Consistent implementation of updateDestiny action.The function follows the same pattern as createDestiny, maintaining consistency across the codebase.
7-7: Verify executeAction utility implementation.Let's ensure the executeAction utility is properly implemented with correct type definitions.
✅ Verification successful
executeAction utility is properly implemented and typed
The utility is well-implemented with:
- Generic type parameter
<T>for flexible response data- Proper type definitions for
ActionResponseandActionType- Comprehensive error handling with type checking
- Correct authentication token validation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for executeAction implementation and type definitions echo "Searching for executeAction implementation..." rg -t typescript "export.*executeAction.*=" -A 5Length of output: 186
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for executeAction implementation with ripgrep echo "Searching for executeAction implementation..." rg "export.*executeAction" -A 5 # Also search for any executeAction usage or definition echo -e "\nSearching for executeAction references..." rg "executeAction" # Find the utils.ts file in the same directory echo -e "\nLocating utils.ts file..." fd "utils.ts" --type fLength of output: 2338
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the complete implementation including types cat apps/opt/integration/actions/utils.ts # Also check for ActionType and ActionResponse definitions echo -e "\nSearching for ActionType and ActionResponse definitions..." rg "type ActionResponse|enum ActionType" -A 5Length of output: 1560
apps/opt/integration/actions/utils.ts (1)
20-22:⚠️ Potential issueFix hardcoded error message and enhance error logging.
The error message is hardcoded to "budget" despite this being a generic utility. Also, consider adding proper error tracking for production environments.
Apply these improvements:
- console.error(`Failed to ${actionType} budget:`, error); - if (error instanceof Error) return { success: false, error: error.message }; - return { success: false, error: `Failed to ${actionType} budget` }; + // TODO: Integrate with proper error tracking service + console.error(`Action execution failed (${actionType}):`, error); + if (error instanceof Error) return { success: false, error: error.message }; + return { success: false, error: `Failed to perform ${actionType} action` };Let's verify if this utility is used consistently across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate the final response.
Enhance error handling consistency across the codebase
The error handling patterns in the codebase show that:
- Other modules use more specific error handling approaches (toast notifications, custom error types)
- Some modules integrate with proper error tracking (AuthError handling)
- The budget-specific message is indeed unique to this utility and doesn't align with other error messages
Let's improve the error handling to match the codebase patterns:
- console.error(`Failed to ${actionType} budget:`, error); - if (error instanceof Error) return { success: false, error: error.message }; - return { success: false, error: `Failed to ${actionType} budget` }; + if (error instanceof Error) { + console.error(`Action execution failed (${actionType}):`, error.message); + return { success: false, error: error.message }; + } + console.error(`Action execution failed (${actionType}):`, error); + return { success: false, error: `Failed to perform ${actionType} action` };🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent error handling patterns # Look for direct console.error usage in action files rg "console\.error" "apps/opt/integration/actions/" # Look for other implementations of similar error handling ast-grep --pattern 'try { $$$ } catch (error) { $$$ }'Length of output: 4553
apps/suite/utils/index.ts (1)
7-8: LGTM: Async conversion is appropriate.The conversion to async/await is correct since
cookies()returns a Promise that needs to be resolved.apps/opt/integration/actions/ActivityActions.ts (3)
1-9: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.The imports are properly structured and all dependencies are clearly necessary for the functionality.
18-25: LGTM! Consistent implementation of updateActivity.The function follows the same clean pattern as createActivity, with proper parameter ordering and delegation to executeAction.
11-16: LGTM! Clean implementation of createActivity.The function follows the new pattern consistently, properly delegating token handling and error management to the executeAction utility.
Let's verify the ActivityAdapter implementation matches this usage:
✅ Verification successful
Implementation verified - ActivityAdapter.create matches the usage
The ActivityAdapter implementation in
apps/opt/integration/adapters/ActivityAdapter.tsperfectly matches the expected usage:
- Takes
activity: Activityandtoken: stringparameters- Returns
Promise<Activity>- Properly implements the API call using
apiRequest🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify ActivityAdapter.create method signature ast-grep --pattern 'class ActivityAdapter { $$$ create(activity: $_, token: $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for ActivityAdapter class and its implementation rg "class ActivityAdapter" -A 10 # Also search for any create method related to Activity rg "create.*Activity" -A 5 # Search for files containing ActivityAdapter fd ActivityAdapterLength of output: 1912
apps/opt/next.config.js (1)
4-4: Verify the internationalization configuration file exists.The change looks good, but let's verify that the referenced TypeScript file exists and is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the content of the request.ts file to ensure it's properly configured.
Let me verify one final thing - the existence of the messages directory and locale files that are being imported.
Internationalization configuration is properly set up
The configuration is correctly implemented with:
- Valid request handler using
getRequestConfig- Proper routing configuration with supported locales (en-US, es-ES)
- Corresponding message files present in the messages directory
- Correct imports from next-intl packages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and basic structure of the i18n configuration # Check if the file exists if ! fd -p "apps/opt/i18n/request.ts$"; then echo "Error: Missing i18n configuration file" exit 1 fi # Verify the basic structure of the request handler ast-grep --pattern 'export function middleware($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the i18n configuration file cat apps/opt/i18n/request.ts # Also verify if there are any imports of next-intl related packages rg "from ['\"](next-intl|@next-intl)" apps/opt/i18n/request.tsLength of output: 643
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the messages directory exists and contains JSON files fd -p "apps/opt/messages/.*\.json$" # Verify the routing configuration cat apps/opt/i18n/routing.tsLength of output: 533
apps/suite/app/[locale]/page.tsx (3)
1-6: LGTM! Clean import organizationGood removal of the unstable API import, which improves code stability.
Line range hint
14-29: LGTM! Well-structured rendering logicThe component follows Next.js best practices with proper:
- Translation key usage
- Image optimization
- Semantic HTML structure
- Internationalized routing
Line range hint
17-19: Verify translation keys exist in all locale filesLet's ensure the translation keys ('title3', 'subtitle2', 'getStarted') exist in all locale files to prevent runtime errors.
✅ Verification successful
The previous script didn't correctly identify the translation files. Let me try a more targeted approach to check the translation files specifically in the suite app where the code change is made.
Translation keys verified successfully
All required translation keys ('title3', 'subtitle2', 'getStarted') are present in both English (en-US) and Spanish (es-ES) locale files under the 'home' namespace with appropriate translations:
home.title3: "Empower your everyday" / "Potencia tu día a día"home.subtitle2: "One suite for every aspect of your modern life" / "Una suite para cada aspecto de tu vida moderna"home.getStarted: "Get started" / "Comienza ya"🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if required translation keys exist in all locale files # Expected: All keys should be present in all locale files # Find all locale files echo "Checking translation files for required keys..." fd -e json -e yaml . | while read -r file; do if [[ $file == *"locales"* ]]; then echo "Checking $file" for key in "title3" "subtitle2" "getStarted"; do if ! grep -q "\"$key\":" "$file" && ! grep -q "$key:" "$file"; then echo "Warning: Key '$key' not found in $file" fi done fi doneLength of output: 1875
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of translation files in suite app echo "Content of apps/suite/messages/en-US.json:" cat apps/suite/messages/en-US.json echo -e "\nContent of apps/suite/messages/es-ES.json:" cat apps/suite/messages/es-ES.jsonLength of output: 4390
apps/web/middleware.ts (3)
6-6: LGTM! Good refactoring of locale configuration.Moving locale configuration to a separate routing module improves maintainability and follows the DRY principle by centralizing locale management.
10-10: Verify routing object structure.The change simplifies middleware creation, but we should verify that the routing object contains all required configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Routing configuration is properly structured and consistent
The routing object in
apps/web/i18n/routing.tscontains all required configuration:
- Properly defined locales:
['en-US', 'es-ES']- Default locale:
'en-US'- Locale prefix configuration with appropriate mode and prefix mappings
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify routing configuration structure # Expected: routing object should contain locales and defaultLocale # Check routing configuration structure ast-grep --pattern 'export const routing = { $$$ locales: $_, defaultLocale: $_, $$$ }' apps/web/i18n/routing.tsLength of output: 980
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different approaches to verify the routing configuration # First, let's find the routing file fd "routing.ts" --type f # Then let's examine its content rg "routing\s*=\s*" -A 10 # Also check for any exports related to routing configuration rg "export.*routing" -A 10 # Look for locale-related configurations rg "locales.*=.*\[" -A 5 rg "defaultLocale.*=.*" -A 2Length of output: 3182
Line range hint
19-28: Verify protected routes behavior with the updated middleware.While the core authentication logic remains unchanged, let's verify that protected routes still work as expected with the new routing configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Protected routes are properly configured in the middleware
The verification shows that the middleware implementation is secure and working as expected:
- Public pages are explicitly defined (
publicPages = ['/'])- Protected routes are properly configured in the matcher array:
/profile/dashboard- A catch-all pattern that excludes static assets and API routes
- The authentication logic correctly redirects unauthenticated users to
/login- The internationalization middleware (
intlMiddleware) is applied consistently for both authenticated and public routes🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify protected routes configuration # Expected: All protected routes should be listed in the matcher # Check if all protected routes referenced in the code are included in the matcher rg -l "NextResponse.redirect\(.*?['\"]/(.*?)['\"]" | while read -r file; do echo "Checking redirects in $file:" rg "NextResponse.redirect\(.*?['\"]/(.*?)['\"]" "$file" done # Verify matcher configuration echo "Checking matcher configuration:" rg "matcher.*=.*\[.*\]" apps/web/middleware.tsLength of output: 980
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the middleware configuration more comprehensively # Check the public path regex pattern definition echo "Checking public path regex definition:" rg "publicPathnameRegex.*=.*" apps/web/middleware.ts # Check for any route configuration or constants echo "Checking route configurations:" rg "const.*(?i)(routes?|paths?|pages?)" apps/web/middleware.ts # Check the middleware export configuration echo "Checking middleware export and configuration:" cat apps/web/middleware.ts # Check for any route definitions in nearby config files echo "Checking for route configurations in config files:" fd -e ts -e js config middleware --exec rg -l "(?i)(routes?|paths?|pages?)"Length of output: 1765
apps/suite/middleware.ts (2)
6-6: LGTM! Good practice to centralize locale configuration.Moving from hardcoded locales to a centralized configuration improves maintainability and reduces duplication.
10-10: Verify routing configuration completeness.The middleware now uses the centralized routing configuration. Let's verify the routing object contains all required fields.
✅ Verification successful
Routing configuration is properly defined and complete
The routing object is correctly configured with all required fields:
- Defines supported locales (
en-US,es-ES)- Sets default locale (
en-US)- Includes locale prefix configuration
- Is properly imported and used in the middleware
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify routing configuration completeness # Expected fields: locales, defaultLocale # Check routing configuration echo "Checking routing configuration..." rg -A 10 "export const routing = {" "./i18n/routing"Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different approaches to find the routing configuration # Search for routing configuration files echo "Looking for routing configuration files:" fd routing # Search for routing object definition with ripgrep, escaping the curly brace echo -e "\nSearching for routing object definition:" rg "export const routing = \{" -A 10 # Search for routing configuration using ast-grep echo -e "\nSearching with ast-grep:" ast-grep --pattern 'const routing = { $$$ }'Length of output: 430
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the routing files we found echo "Content of apps/suite/i18n/routing.ts (since the middleware is in apps/suite):" cat apps/suite/i18n/routing.ts echo -e "\nChecking imports of routing in middleware:" rg -B 3 -A 3 "const intlMiddleware = createMiddleware\(routing\)" apps/suite/middleware.tsLength of output: 1013
apps/opt/middleware.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.Moving locale configuration to a dedicated routing module improves maintainability and follows separation of concerns.
11-11: Verify routing configuration structure.The middleware now uses the routing configuration object. Let's verify it has the required structure.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify routing configuration structure # Expected: routing.ts should export locales and defaultLocale # Check routing module structure ast-grep --pattern 'export const routing = { locales: $_, defaultLocale: $_, $$$ }' # Check for any potential references to old locales configuration rg -l 'createMiddleware\(\{.*locales.*\}\)'apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.ts (3)
1-7: LGTM: Import statements are well-structuredThe addition of UUID from node:crypto and new interface imports are appropriate for the changes.
10-10: LGTM: Good use of readonly propertiesMaking
idandcreatedAtreadonly provides better immutability guarantees.Also applies to: 13-13
31-38: LGTM: Well-structured status enumThe TripStatus enum provides a clear and comprehensive set of states for the trip lifecycle.
apps/opt/store/tripStore.ts (1)
25-25:⚠️ Potential issueRemove hardcoded trip ID from initial state.
The hardcoded ID
't-r-i-p-s-t-id'in the initial state could cause issues:
- It may conflict with actual trip IDs in the system
- New trips should start with an empty ID or be generated when created
- This appears to be a development placeholder that shouldn't be in production
Apply this diff to fix:
- id: 't-r-i-p-s-t-id', + id: '',Let's verify how trips are created and if this ID is used elsewhere:
packages/ui/package.json (2)
42-42:⚠️ Major version upgrade of Next.js requires careful reviewThe upgrade from Next.js 14 to 15 may introduce breaking changes. Please ensure:
- Review the migration guide
- Test all pages and components thoroughly
- Check compatibility with your routing setup and middleware
27-27: Verify compatibility between updated packagesPlease ensure compatibility between:
- next-auth beta.25 and Next.js 15
- next-intl 3.23.5 and Next.js 15
- Prisma 5.21.1 and Next.js 15 server components
Also applies to: 35-35, 42-42, 43-43, 44-44
apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (4)
3-3: LGTM: Import changes look good!Good update to use the stable
setRequestLocaleAPI instead of the unstable version. The new imports are properly organized and support the authentication and navigation enhancements.Also applies to: 5-5, 8-8
64-64: LGTM: Clean props passing!The spread operator usage is clean and readable, with good separation of the static title prop from the dynamic props.
26-31: Verify authentication session handling.The authentication flow and locale setup are properly implemented. The use of double negation for the authenticated state provides a safe boolean conversion.
Let's verify the authentication implementation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent auth session handling across the application # Search for auth session handling patterns ast-grep --pattern 'const session = await auth()' ast-grep --pattern 'const authenticated = !!session'
19-24: Verify supported locales consistency.The type definition correctly restricts locales to 'es' | 'en', matching the
languagesarray. The async extraction of locale is properly implemented.Let's verify that all locale references are consistent:
✅ Verification successful
The previous search didn't yield relevant results, and the output seems unrelated to locale verification. Let's try a more focused search to find locale-related code and configurations.
Let's verify the actual languages array definition to ensure it matches with the type definition we're reviewing.
Locale configuration is consistent across the codebase
The type definition
locale: 'es' | 'en'perfectly matches thelanguagesarray['en', 'es']defined in all layout files. All locale references in components and routing logic consistently use these two languages. The implementation is verified to be correct and consistent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any hardcoded locale strings that might not match our supported locales # Search for locale-related patterns rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' -i "locale.*['\"](?:en|es)['\"]" rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' "language.*['\"](?:en|es)['\"]"Length of output: 532
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's search for locale-related patterns more comprehensively rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' -i "locale.*['\"](?:en|es)['\"]|locale.*type.*=.*(?:en|es)" -A 2 # Also search for language configuration or constants fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx --exec grep -l -i "languages.*\[\s*['\"].*['\"]"Length of output: 2134
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual languages array definition in the layout files rg -A 3 "languages.*=.*\[" ./apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx ./apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx ./apps/web/app/[locale]/layout.tsx # Also check for any other locale type definitions ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = $$$"en"$$$|$$$"es"$$$'Length of output: 1020
apps/opt/components/UI/StepperFlow.tsx (1)
6-6: Verify consistent router import migration across components.The change from
@opt/navigationsto@opt/i18n/routingappears to be part of a broader migration to internationalization-aware routing. The implementation looks correct as the router usage remains compatible.Let's verify the consistency of this migration across other components:
✅ Verification successful
Router import migration is correctly implemented and consistent
The verification shows that:
- All
@optcomponents use the new@opt/i18n/routingimport consistently- The router usage in StepperFlow.tsx (
router.push,router.back) is compatible with the new import- Other apps (suite, web) correctly use their own i18n-aware routing imports
- Only one component (TripDestinies.tsx) uses Next.js navigation directly, which appears intentional
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining old router imports and confirm consistent migration # Test 1: Check for any remaining old imports echo "Checking for any remaining old router imports..." rg "from '@opt/navigations'" # Test 2: Verify new import pattern in related components mentioned in the summary echo "Verifying new import pattern in related components..." rg "from '@opt/i18n/routing'" -l | grep -E "NotFound|CustomMapControl|TripCard"Length of output: 434
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify if there are any other router imports in the codebase # to ensure complete migration and consistency # Check all router-related imports echo "Checking all router-related imports in the codebase..." rg "import.*useRouter" -A 1 # Check specific usage in StepperFlow.tsx to verify compatibility echo "Checking router usage in StepperFlow.tsx..." rg "useRouter|router\." apps/opt/components/UI/StepperFlow.tsx -A 2Length of output: 2253
apps/suite/components/Footer.tsx (1)
6-6: LGTM! Verify consistent import path updates across the codebase.The import path change from '@sss/navigations' to '@sss/i18n/routing' improves code organization by properly categorizing i18n-related routing utilities.
Let's verify that all components have been updated consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Import path migration is complete and consistent
The verification confirms that:
- No files are using the old import path
@sss/navigations- The new import path
@sss/i18n/routingis consistently used across 8 files in the codebase🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining imports from old path and confirm new path usage echo "Checking for any remaining old imports..." rg -l "@sss/navigations" echo -e "\nVerifying new import path usage..." rg -l "@sss/i18n/routing"Length of output: 541
apps/suite/components/auth/RegisterForm.tsx (1)
14-14: LGTM! Verify other components are updated.The import path change aligns with the codebase's move towards i18n-aware routing.
Let's verify all components have been updated to use the new import path:
✅ Verification successful
Import path migration is complete
The verification shows that all components consistently use the new
@sss/i18n/routingimport path, and there are no remaining instances of the old@sss/navigationsimport. The migration appears to be complete and consistent across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining old import paths rg "from '@sss/navigations'" # Verify the new import is consistently used rg "from '@sss/i18n/routing'"Length of output: 776
apps/suite/components/auth/LoginForm.tsx (1)
11-11: Verify router functionality after import source change.The change from '@sss/navigations' to '@sss/i18n/routing' suggests integration with i18n routing capabilities. While the change aligns with the broader refactoring mentioned in the summary, we should verify the router API compatibility.
Let's verify the router implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Import change is safe and router functionality is maintained
The verification shows that:
- The new router implementation in
apps/suite/i18n/routing.tsexports the sameuseRouterhook with identical functionality- The
back()method is available and used consistently across the codebase- Other components in the suite app are already using the new
@sss/i18n/routingimport- The router implementation is consistent across all apps (suite, opt, web) following the same pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the router implementation and usage across the codebase # Test 1: Check if other components are consistently using the new import echo "Checking for any remaining old router imports..." rg "from '@sss/navigations'" -l # Test 2: Verify the new router implementation echo "Checking new router implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'export const useRouter = $_' # Test 3: Verify the back() method exists in the new implementation echo "Verifying back() method existence..." rg -A 5 "back\(\)" "apps/suite/**/routing.{ts,tsx}"Length of output: 490
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search to locate the routing implementation and its usage # Find all files that might contain the routing implementation echo "Searching for i18n routing files..." fd "routing\.(ts|tsx)$" # Check for useRouter implementation or exports echo "Checking for useRouter in the codebase..." rg "useRouter" -A 5 # Look for back() method usage in the codebase echo "Searching for back() method usage..." rg "\.back\(\)" -A 2 # Check for any exports from @sss/i18n/routing echo "Checking exports from i18n routing..." fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg "export.*from.*@sss/i18n/routing"Length of output: 9519
apps/opt/messages/es-ES.json (2)
1-48: LGTM! Well-structured localization file.The JSON structure is clean, properly nested, and follows a logical organization of sections.
29-35: LGTM! Clear and consistent navigation translations.The navbar translations follow Spanish UI conventions and provide clear user action labels.
packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_mixins.scss (1)
269-294: LGTM! Good use of SCSS nesting.The addition of
&selectors for each text type improves specificity and follows SCSS best practices. The changes maintain the existing functionality while making the code more maintainable.apps/opt/components/trips/CustomMapControl.tsx (1)
18-18: Verify routing module migration consistency.The import path change from '@opt/navigations' to '@opt/i18n/routing' appears to be part of a broader migration to i18n-aware routing.
✅ Verification successful
Migration to i18n routing module is consistent
The verification shows that:
- No remaining imports from the old '@opt/navigations' module were found
- The new '@opt/i18n/routing' module is consistently used across 6 files in the codebase
- All imports are using either
useRouterorLinkfrom the new module🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of the new routing module across the codebase # Test 1: Check for any remaining old imports echo "Checking for remaining old imports..." rg "from '@opt/navigations'" --type tsx # Test 2: Verify new routing module usage echo "Checking new routing module usage..." rg "from '@opt/i18n/routing'" --type tsxLength of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of the routing modules across the codebase # Note: Using .ts and .tsx extensions explicitly since rg doesn't recognize tsx type # Test 1: Check for any remaining old imports echo "Checking for remaining old imports..." rg "from ['\"]@opt/navigations['\"]" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" # Test 2: Verify new routing module usage echo "Checking new routing module usage..." rg "from ['\"]@opt/i18n/routing['\"]" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" # Test 3: Check if the old module exists echo "Checking if old module exists..." fd "navigations" --type f # Test 4: Check if the new module exists echo "Checking if new module exists..." fd "i18n/routing" --type fLength of output: 994
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 30
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
apps/opt/components/trips/TripsList.tsx (1)
5-11: Consider architectural improvements for better accessibility and performance.
- Add ARIA attributes for better accessibility
- Consider virtualization for large lists
Here's an enhanced version with accessibility improvements:
export const TripsList = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => { return ( - <ul className="trip-list"> + <ul + className="trip-list" + role="list" + aria-label="List of trips" + > {trips && trips.map((trip) => <TripCard key={trip.id} {...{ trip }} />)} </ul> ); };If you expect this list to grow large, consider implementing virtualization using libraries like
react-windoworreact-virtualizedto improve performance.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 8-8: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
apps/opt/core/interfaces/ExpenseInterface.ts (1)
3-13: Add JSDoc documentation and improve type safety.The interface would benefit from documentation explaining its purpose and field descriptions. Additionally, some fields could use more specific types for better type safety.
Add documentation and improve types:
+/** + * Represents an expense within a trip + * @interface Expense + */ export interface Expense { id: number; + /** Name/description of the expense */ name: string; - value: number; + /** Amount in the specified currency (should handle decimals) */ + value: number; // Consider using Decimal.js or similar for precise calculations isShared: boolean; currencyId: number; tripId: UUID; activityId: number; destinyId: UUID; createdAt: Date; + updatedAt?: Date; }apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1)
8-8: Add TypeScript types for better type safety.Consider adding TypeScript types to improve maintainability and catch potential issues at compile time.
-export default function Dashboard() { +export default function Dashboard(): React.ReactElement {Also consider adding prop types validation for the render prop:
interface TripsRenderProps { trips: Trip[]; } // Usage <TripsDataWrapper> {({ trips }: TripsRenderProps) => ( // ... )} </TripsDataWrapper>apps/opt/components/trips/TripsDataWrapper.tsx (1)
10-18: Consider implementing error boundaries for better error handling.The component could benefit from being wrapped in an error boundary to gracefully handle runtime errors and prevent the entire app from crashing.
Consider creating an ErrorBoundary component and implementing it like this:
class TripErrorBoundary extends React.Component<{ children: React.ReactNode }> { // Error boundary implementation } // Usage export const TripsDataWrapper = ({ children }: TripsDataWrapperProps) => { const Component = () => { const { useTrips } = createTripsHooks(TripAdapter); // ... rest of your current implementation }; return ( <TripErrorBoundary> <Component /> </TripErrorBoundary> ); };apps/web/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
7-7: Great architectural choice!Centralizing locale configuration through
routingimport improves maintainability and reduces duplication across the application.
Line range hint
12-27: Verify locale error handling.The layout implementation follows Next.js best practices and properly handles internationalization. Consider adding error handling for invalid locales to improve robustness.
Consider wrapping the locale setup in a try-catch block:
export default async function RootLayout({ children, params: { locale }, }: PageProps) { - setRequestLocale(locale); + try { + setRequestLocale(locale); + } catch (error) { + console.error(`Failed to set locale: ${locale}`, error); + // Fall back to default locale or handle error appropriately + } const messages = await getMessages(); return ( <html lang="en" suppressHydrationWarning>apps/opt/components/trips/TripSearch.tsx (1)
1-7: Consider adding TypeScript interfaces for better type safety.While the imports are well-organized, adding explicit type definitions would improve maintainability and type safety.
Add the following type definitions:
interface TripSearchProps { className?: string; }apps/web/middleware.ts (1)
12-15: Add clarifying comment for path pattern constructionThe pattern construction logic is correct but could benefit from a brief comment explaining the flatMap transformation, particularly why empty string and '/' are both needed for root path handling.
const localePattern = `(/(${routing.locales.join('|')}))?`; +// Handle root path specially by allowing both '' and '/' variations const pagesPattern = publicPages .flatMap((p) => (p === '/' ? ['', '/'] : p)) .join('|');packages/ui/constants/index.ts (1)
11-55: Consider implementing i18n for menu item namesThe menu item names are hardcoded strings, which might not support internationalization requirements.
Consider using translation keys instead of hardcoded strings:
const MENU_KEYS = { LOGIN: 'menu.login', REGISTER: 'menu.register', DASHBOARD: 'menu.dashboard', PROFILE: 'menu.profile' } as const; export const OPT_MENU_ITEMS = [ { name: MENU_KEYS.LOGIN, // ... rest of the properties }, // ... other items ];apps/opt/components/trips/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-38: Consider impact on bundle size with barrel exports.While the barrel file pattern provides a clean API, be mindful that importing from the index file might prevent tree-shaking in some bundlers. For optimal bundle size:
- Consider using direct imports in performance-critical parts of the application
- Monitor the bundle size impact of these exports
- Consider splitting the exports into logical groups if the bundle size becomes a concern
apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.ts (1)
33-57: Well-structured enums with comprehensive values.The enums provide good type safety and cover the necessary scenarios. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and usage of each enum value, especially for less obvious values like 'COMPANY' in TripPriority.
Example documentation:
/** Status of a trip throughout its lifecycle */ export enum TripStatus { /** Initial draft state when trip is first created */ DRAFT = 'DRAFT', // ... other values }apps/opt/store/tripStore.ts (4)
8-24: Add JSDoc documentation to interfaces.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of each interface and its members. This would improve code maintainability and make it easier for other developers to understand the store's structure.
Example improvement:
+/** + * Represents the state shape for trip management + */ interface TripState { + /** The current trip being managed */ trip: Trip; + /** The selected trip type (SOLO, GROUP, etc.) */ tripType: TripType | null; // ... add documentation for other properties } +/** + * Actions available for managing trip state + */ interface TripActions { + /** Updates the current trip */ setTrip: (id: Trip) => void; // ... add documentation for other methods }
Line range hint
42-61: Enhance store persistence and validation.Consider the following improvements:
- Add version control to the persist middleware for future migrations
- Implement validation in setters to ensure data integrity
- Consider composing actions for common operations
Example implementation:
export const useTripStore = create<TripState & TripActions>()( persist( (set) => ({ ...initialState, - setTrip: (trip) => set({ trip: trip }), + setTrip: (trip) => { + if (!trip.id || !trip.title) { + throw new Error('Trip must have an id and title'); + } + set({ trip }); + }, // ... other actions }), { name: 'trip-storage', + version: 1, + migrate: (persistedState: any, version: number) => { + if (version === 0) { + // Handle migration from version 0 to 1 + return persistedState; + } + return persistedState; + }, }, ), );
51-51: Simplify setter using object property shorthand.The setter can be simplified using ES6 object property shorthand syntax.
- setSearchTerm: (searchTerm) => set({ searchTerm: searchTerm }), + setSearchTerm: (searchTerm) => set({ searchTerm }),
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient evidence showing that the codebase consistently uses UUID from the 'crypto' module for trip IDs across various interfaces.
Hard-coded trip ID conflicts with the codebase's UUID pattern
The initial state uses a hard-coded string ID
't-r-i-p-s-t-id', but the codebase consistently uses UUID from the 'crypto' module for trip IDs. This is evident inTripInterface.tswhereidis typed asUUID.
- Replace the hard-coded ID in
apps/opt/store/tripStore.tswith either:
undefinedsince the interface marks it as optional withid?: UUID- Or initialize it properly using the UUID type from crypto module
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
26-40: Review the hard-coded trip ID implementation.The initial state uses a hard-coded ID
't-r-i-p-s-t-id'. This could lead to potential issues:
- If multiple trips are created, they might conflict with this ID
- The ID format might not align with your application's ID generation strategy
Consider:
- Generating a unique ID when a new trip is created
- Using a proper UUID format
- Or initializing the ID as null/empty if it's meant to be set later
Let's check how trip IDs are handled across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for trip ID generation patterns rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' -A 3 'id.*:.*t-r-i-p' # Search for UUID usage in trip-related files rg -g '!*.{json,lock}' -A 3 'uuid|UUID|generateId|newId' apps/opt/Length of output: 2510
apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1)
48-48: Consider adding prop types interface for better type safety.While the spread operator usage is clean, consider creating an interface for the Navbar props to ensure type safety.
Example:
interface NavbarProps { authenticated: boolean; menuItems: typeof SSS_MENU_ITEMS; locale: string; title: { src: string; alt: string }; }apps/opt/messages/en.json (3)
21-25: Add descriptions for features to improve clarity.The features are currently listed with just titles. Consider adding corresponding description keys to provide more context about each feature's benefits.
Example addition:
"feature1": "Integrated destination planning", + "feature1Description": "Plan every aspect of your journey in one place, from accommodations to activities.", "feature2": "Budget management", + "feature2Description": "Track expenses and manage your travel budget efficiently.", // ... similar for other features
18-20: Consider more descriptive button labels for accessibility.The current button labels ("Plan now", "Discover more", "Start your adventure") could be more specific about their actions for better accessibility and user experience.
Consider alternatives like:
- "tryNow": "Plan now", + "tryNow": "Create your travel plan", - "learnMore": "Discover more", + "learnMore": "Learn about our features", - "getStarted": "Start your adventure", + "getStarted": "Create free account"
30-34: Add ARIA labels for navigation items.Consider adding corresponding ARIA label keys for better accessibility.
Example addition:
"login": "Log in", + "loginAriaLabel": "Log in to your account", "register": "Sign up", + "registerAriaLabel": "Create a new account", // ... similar for other navigation itemsapps/opt/components/trips/TripPriorityStep.tsx (2)
16-20: Consider aligning label language with UI text.While the code change to use
TripPriorityenum is good, there's an inconsistency in language usage. The priority labels are in Spanish ('Presupuesto','Destino', etc.) while the UI text is in English ("Ok!, what is yor main trip GOAL?").Consider using consistent language throughout the UI:
{ id: TripPriority.BUDGET, icon: WalletIcon, label: 'Budget' }, { id: TripPriority.DESTINY, icon: MapPinIcon, label: 'Destination' }, { id: TripPriority.COMPANY, icon: UsersIcon, label: 'Company' }, { id: TripPriority.DATES, icon: CalendarIcon, label: 'Dates' }, { id: TripPriority.EXPERIENCE, icon: CompassIcon, label: 'Experience' },Also, there's a typo in the UI text "yor" should be "your".
Line range hint
41-42: Implement missing navigation logic.There's a TODO comment in Spanish indicating missing navigation logic: "Aquí puedes agregar la lógica para pasar a la siguiente pantalla" (Here you can add the logic to move to the next screen).
Would you like me to help implement the navigation logic using React Router or your preferred navigation solution?
apps/opt/messages/es.json (1)
2-28: Consider standardizing key naming patterns.While the translations are well-written, the key naming could be more consistent:
- Keys like "title" and "description" break the numbered sequence pattern (title1-5)
- Consider grouping related content under nested objects for better maintainability
Consider this structure:
"home": { + "hero": { + "titles": { + "main": "Acerca de One Plan Trip", + "sequence": [ + "Tu viaje perfecto, todo en un solo lugar", + "Planifica tu aventura con One Plan Trip", + // ... other titles + ] + } + }, + "content": { + "description": "One Plan Trip es tu compañero ideal..." + } }apps/opt/components/trips/TripStats.tsx (1)
1-123: Consider separating calculation logic from presentation.The component currently handles both statistics calculations and presentation. Consider extracting the calculation logic into a custom hook for better maintainability and reusability.
Example structure:
// useTripStats.ts export const useTripStats = (trips: Trip[]) => { const calculateTotalBudget = () => {...} const calculateTotalExpenses = () => {...} // ... other calculations return { totalBudget, totalExpenses, // ... other stats } } // TripStats.tsx export const TripStats = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => { const stats = useTripStats(trips) // rendering logic }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (49)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/[id]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripDestinies.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripPriorityStep.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripSearch.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripSections.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripStats.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripTypeStep.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripsContainer.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripsDataWrapper.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripsList.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/components/trips/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/DestinyInterface.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/ExpenseInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripGroupInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/UserInterface.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/i18n.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/opt/i18n/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/i18n/routing.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/messages/en.json (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/messages/es.json (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/middleware.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/opt/store/tripStore.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/login/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/profile/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/register/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/suite/i18n.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/suite/i18n/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/i18n/routing.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/suite/middleware.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/i18n.ts (0 hunks)
- apps/web/i18n/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/i18n/routing.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/middleware.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/constants/index.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/src/components/Card.tsx (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_functions.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_mixins.scss (2 hunks)
- packages/ui/styles/components/_trip-list.scss (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripsContainer.tsx
- apps/opt/i18n.ts
- apps/suite/i18n.ts
- apps/web/i18n.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (19)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx
- apps/opt/components/trips/TripDestinies.tsx
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/DestinyInterface.ts
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripGroupInterface.ts
- apps/opt/core/interfaces/UserInterface.ts
- apps/opt/i18n/request.ts
- apps/opt/i18n/routing.ts
- apps/opt/middleware.ts
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx
- apps/suite/app/[locale]/page.tsx
- apps/suite/i18n/request.ts
- apps/suite/i18n/routing.ts
- apps/suite/middleware.ts
- apps/web/i18n/request.ts
- apps/web/i18n/routing.ts
- packages/ui/package.json
- packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_functions.scss
- packages/ui/styles/abstracts/_mixins.scss
- packages/ui/types/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/opt/components/trips/TripsList.tsx
[error] 8-8: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (42)
apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/[id]/page.tsx (1)
3-7: Previous review comment is still applicable.The concerns raised in the previous review about unnecessary async pattern and type safety remain valid.
Let's verify this against Next.js conventions:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check other Next.js page components in the codebase for comparison # Expect: Most page components should use synchronous patterns with direct props # Search for other page.tsx files and their component declarations fd -e tsx -E '.next' -E 'node_modules' --exec rg -A 2 'export default .*function.*Page.*|export default .*function.*\(\{.*params'apps/opt/components/trips/TripsList.tsx (1)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.The imports are properly structured using named imports and follow a consistent pattern.
apps/opt/core/interfaces/ExpenseInterface.ts (1)
15-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueAddress ID type inconsistency and add documentation.
The interface uses inconsistent ID types (string for memberId, number for others) and lacks documentation. Also, consider adding validation for the amount field.
Apply these improvements:
+/** + * Represents a member's portion of a shared expense + * @interface ExpenseMember + */ export interface ExpenseMember { id: number; - memberId: string; + memberId: number; // Align with other ID types expenseId: number; - amount: number; + /** Member's share of the expense (should handle decimals) */ + amount: number; // Consider using Decimal.js or similar isIncluded: boolean; + /** Timestamp for auditing */ + createdAt: Date; }Additionally, consider adding runtime validation to ensure:
- The amount is non-negative
- The sum of all member amounts doesn't exceed the main expense value
- The expenseId references a valid Expense
Let's check if there are any validation utilities already in place:
apps/suite/app/[locale]/profile/page.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import changes align with i18n requirements.The switch to
@sss/i18n/routingfor redirect functionality provides better internationalization support.
13-13: Verify locale handling during authentication flow.The redirect now properly handles internationalization by using the default locale. However, we should verify if using
defaultLocaleis the intended behavior instead of preserving the user's current locale.Consider these scenarios:
- A user visits the profile page with a non-default locale
- They get redirected to login
- After login, they might expect to return to their original locale
✅ Verification successful
Using defaultLocale for authentication redirects is the correct implementation
The codebase shows a consistent pattern where all authentication-related redirects use
routing.defaultLocale. This includes:
- Login page redirecting to dashboard
- Register page redirecting to dashboard
- Dashboard/Profile pages redirecting to login when unauthenticated
- Home page redirecting to dashboard
This implementation ensures a consistent and predictable authentication flow across the application, where users always start from a known locale state during authentication, preventing potential locale-related edge cases in the auth flow.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are other authentication flows that might handle locale differently rg -A 5 "redirect.*locale" --type typescriptLength of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for redirect patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript files rg -t js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx -A 5 "redirect.*locale" # Also search for any locale-related redirects in authentication flows rg -t js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx -A 5 "(auth|login|signin).*redirect" # Look for other usages of defaultLocale in routing context rg -t js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx "defaultLocale"Length of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for redirect patterns without file type flags rg -A 5 "redirect.*locale" # Search for authentication-related redirects rg -A 5 "(auth|login|signin).*redirect" # Look for defaultLocale usage rg "defaultLocale" # Find all TypeScript/JavaScript files that might contain routing logic fd "\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx)$" | grep -i "route\|redirect\|auth"Length of output: 3892
packages/ui/src/components/Card.tsx (1)
3-6: LGTM! Well-structured type definition.The
CardPropstype definition is well-designed with appropriate use of union types and optional modifier for the title prop.apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (2)
1-6: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are clean, well-organized, and follow consistent naming conventions.
8-24: Excellent refactoring! Clean component composition.The new implementation effectively addresses previous issues through proper componentization and separation of concerns. The render props pattern with
TripsDataWrapperprovides a clean way to handle data fetching and distribution.apps/opt/components/trips/TripsDataWrapper.tsx (1)
11-12: Verify the hook creation pattern implementation.The
createTripsHookspattern is being used correctly, but let's verify its implementation across the codebase to ensure consistent usage.✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have sufficient information about the hook creation pattern implementation.
Hook creation pattern is implemented consistently
The
createTripsHookspattern is correctly implemented and used consistently across the codebase:
- Properly exported from a centralized hooks directory in
apps/opt/integration/hooks/- Follows the same pattern as other hook creators (ActivityHooks, DestinyHooks, BudgetHooks)
- Implementation in
TripHooks.tscorrectly returns a repository-based hook factory- Used consistently in components (
TripsDataWrapper.tsxandTripDetails.tsx) with proper repository injection🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of createTripsHooks usage rg "createTripsHooks" -A 3 # Search for similar hook creation patterns ast-grep --pattern 'const { use$_ } = create$_Hooks($_)'Length of output: 2096
apps/web/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
3-3: Good upgrade to stable API!Switching from
unstable_setRequestLocaletosetRequestLocaleis a positive change that improves stability and maintainability.
9-11: Verify consistent usage across layouts.The implementation correctly uses centralized locale configuration. However, let's ensure this pattern is consistently applied across all layout files.
✅ Verification successful
All layout files consistently use routing.locales for static params generation
The verification shows that all three layout files in the monorepo (
apps/web,apps/suite, andapps/opt) consistently use the same pattern withrouting.locales.map((locale) => ({ locale }))for generating static params. No hardcoded language arrays were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of routing.locales across layout files # Expected: All layout files should use routing.locales for static params # Search for generateStaticParams implementations in layout files ast-grep --pattern 'export async function generateStaticParams() { $$$ }' # Search for any remaining hardcoded language arrays rg -l "languages.*=.*\[.*\]" "app/[locale]"Length of output: 820
apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/page.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are logically grouped and follow a clean organization pattern, properly separating component, interface, and routing imports.
23-25: LGTM! Clean component structure.The new structure with
TripsDataWrapperandTripsListfollows good separation of concerns. The render props pattern with proper TypeScript typing provides both flexibility and type safety.apps/opt/components/trips/TripSearch.tsx (1)
8-30: Verify Dashboard integration and prop passing.Let's verify how this component is integrated within the Dashboard and ensure proper prop passing.
✅ Verification successful
Integration verified - no prop passing issues found
The verification confirms that
TripSearchis correctly integrated in the Dashboard without any props being passed, which aligns with its implementation as a self-contained component using internal state management throughuseTripStore.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check Dashboard integration and potential prop passing # Look for TripSearch usage in Dashboard ast-grep --pattern 'TripSearch' # Check if there are any props being passed to TripSearch that we need to handle rg -A 5 '<TripSearch'Length of output: 799
apps/web/middleware.ts (3)
6-6: LGTM: Clean import of centralized routing configurationThe change appropriately imports the routing configuration from a dedicated i18n module, following good separation of concerns.
17-20: LGTM: Verify regex pattern matches expected routesThe regex construction is correct and properly combines locale and page patterns. The case-insensitive flag ensures flexible matching.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the regex pattern construction.
Regex pattern construction is correct and consistent across apps
The regex pattern construction is verified to be correct based on the following findings:
- The
localePatterncorrectly handles optional locale prefixes for 'en' and 'es'- The
pagesPatternproperly handles public routes including special case for root path ('/')- The pattern combination with
^${localePattern}(${pagesPattern})/?$ensures:
- Optional locale prefix (/en or /es)
- Matches exact public routes
- Optional trailing slash
- Case-insensitive matching with 'i' flag
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the public routes that should match echo "Testing public route patterns..." for locale in $(ast-grep --pattern 'locales: [$_]' | grep -o '"[^"]*"' | tr -d '"'); do for page in $(rg -o 'const publicPages = \[(.*?)\]' -r '$1' | tr ',' '\n' | tr -d "' "); do # Test with and without trailing slash echo "/${locale}${page}" echo "/${locale}${page}/" done # Test without locale prefix echo "${page}" echo "${page}/" doneLength of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's get the actual patterns being used echo "Locale Pattern:" rg "const localePattern = " -A 1 echo "\nPages Pattern:" rg "const pagesPattern = " -A 1 # Get the public pages array echo "\nPublic Pages:" rg "const publicPages = \[.*\]" # Get the locales configuration echo "\nLocales Configuration:" rg "locales: \[.*\]"Length of output: 1472
10-10: Verify routing object structure for middleware compatibilityWhile the change to use centralized routing configuration is good, we should verify the routing object provides all required properties for the middleware.
✅ Verification successful
Routing configuration is properly structured for next-intl middleware
The routing object being passed to
createMiddlewareis correctly structured with all required properties:
- Defined in
apps/web/i18n/routing.tsusingdefineRouting- Contains required
localesanddefaultLocaleproperties- Includes proper locale prefix configuration
The consistent usage across all apps (opt, suite, web) with identical configuration structure further validates the compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify routing object structure matches middleware requirements ast-grep --pattern 'export const routing = { $$$ locales: $_, defaultLocale: $_, $$$ }'Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first find the routing configuration file fd routing -e ts -e js # Then examine its content rg -A 10 "export const routing"Length of output: 1561
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the createMiddleware implementation to verify expected properties rg -A 5 "createMiddleware.*=.*" # Also check for any type definitions that might show required properties rg -A 5 "type.*Routing"Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for the defineRouting function since it's used in routing configs rg -A 5 "function defineRouting|const defineRouting" # Also look for the middleware import to trace its source rg "import.*createMiddleware"Length of output: 316
apps/suite/app/[locale]/login/page.tsx (1)
8-8: Verify the custom routing module implementation.The switch from Next.js's built-in navigation to a custom routing module warrants verification of the i18n routing implementation.
Let's verify the custom routing module implementation:
packages/ui/constants/index.ts (1)
24-25: Verify protected route handlingThe protected routes (dashboard and profile) are marked with a boolean flag, but we should ensure this is properly enforced in the routing logic.
Let's check how these protected routes are handled:
Also applies to: 29-30, 47-48, 52-53
✅ Verification successful
Protected routes are properly enforced
The middleware implementations in all three apps (opt, web, and suite) properly enforce route protection:
- They define public pages explicitly (
publicPagesarray)- All other routes require authentication (
req.auth && req.auth.user)- Unauthenticated users are redirected to the login page
- The middleware matcher configurations explicitly include the protected routes (
/dashboard,/profile)- The protected flag in the constants file aligns with the middleware implementation
The route protection is consistently implemented across the codebase and properly secures the marked routes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for route protection implementation rg -l "protected.*route" --type ts --type tsx # Search for authentication checks rg -l "auth.*middleware|isAuthenticated|requireAuth" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for route protection implementation with correct file type rg -l "protected.*route" # Search for authentication checks with correct file type rg -l "auth.*middleware|isAuthenticated|requireAuth" # Look for route protection related code rg -l "protected\s*:\s*true" # Search for router implementation files fd "router|route" --type f # Look for middleware or guard implementations rg -l "middleware|guard"Length of output: 475
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check middleware implementations for auth protection cat apps/opt/middleware.ts apps/web/middleware.ts apps/suite/middleware.ts # Check the context of protected routes in constants rg -C 5 "protected\s*:\s*true" packages/ui/constants/index.tsLength of output: 3674
apps/suite/app/[locale]/register/page.tsx (1)
9-9: LGTM: Import change aligns with i18n requirements.The change to import
redirectfrom@sss/i18n/routinginstead ofnext/navigationis appropriate for supporting internationalized routing.apps/opt/components/trips/index.tsx (2)
24-31: LGTM! Well-organized exports.The new exports are well-structured and maintain a consistent organization pattern. The grouping of related components (e.g., TripSection with TripSections) makes the code more maintainable.
12-16: Verify the migration from TripsContainer to TripsDataWrapper.The replacement of
TripsContainerwithTripsDataWrappersuggests an architectural change in how trip data is managed.Let's verify that all usages of the old component have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of TripsDataWrapper to ensure the migration is complete.
Migration from TripsContainer to TripsDataWrapper is complete and properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- No references to the old
TripsContainerremain in the codebaseTripsDataWrapperis properly implemented as a data fetching wrapper component- The new component is correctly used in both
/tripsand/dashboardpages- The migration appears to be a clean architectural improvement, moving to a more explicit data-fetching pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to TripsContainer # Expected: No references to the old component should exist echo "Checking for any remaining references to TripsContainer..." rg -l "TripsContainer" echo "Verifying TripsDataWrapper implementation..." ast-grep --pattern 'export const TripsDataWrapper = $_'Length of output: 1103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for usages of TripsDataWrapper echo "Checking TripsDataWrapper usages..." rg "TripsDataWrapper" -B 2 -A 2 # Check for any potential test files related to TripsContainer echo "Checking for any test files mentioning TripsContainer..." fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts | xargs rg "TripsContainer" # Look for any snapshots or configuration files that might reference TripsContainer echo "Checking for TripsContainer in snapshots and configs..." fd -e snap -e json -e yml -e yaml | xargs rg "TripsContainer"Length of output: 3737
apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.ts (2)
1-8: LGTM! Well-structured imports with proper type usage.The addition of UUID from crypto for ID fields and new interface imports are well-organized and properly utilized throughout the interface.
11-11: Good use of readonly properties with UUID type.Making
idandcreatedAtreadonly prevents accidental modifications to these critical fields, and using UUID type improves type safety.Also applies to: 14-14
apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (4)
3-3: LGTM! Good improvements in dependency management.The changes show positive improvements:
- Upgraded to stable next-intl API by removing the
unstable_prefix- Centralized menu items in constants
- Properly imported routing configuration
Also applies to: 6-6, 14-14
21-21: LGTM! Better locale configuration management.Using
routing.localesinstead of hardcoded values improves maintainability by centralizing locale configuration.
38-39: LGTM! Consistent use of centralized constants.Good practice to use the imported constant instead of local declaration.
24-31: Verify the async params handling pattern.While the type definitions are improved, the async handling of params (
const { locale } = await params;) seems unusual. Typically, Next.js route params are synchronously available.Let's check if this pattern is used elsewhere in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let's verify the actual implementation in these files to understand the pattern better.
Let's check if this is a Next.js App Router pattern by examining the imports and component types in these files.
Let's check the next-intl documentation by examining the package.json files to verify the version and check any related configuration files.
The async params handling is correct and follows next-intl patterns
The code is using next-intl v3.23.5 with its server components integration. The pattern
const { locale } = await paramsis consistent with next-intl's middleware setup and server-side internationalization approach, as evidenced by:
- The presence of
next-intl/middlewareusage in middleware files- Consistent usage of
getMessagesandsetRequestLocalefrom 'next-intl/server'- Similar implementation across multiple layout files in the codebase
- Integration with Next.js App Router authentication flow
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar async params handling patterns rg -l "const.*=.*await.*params" --type tsLength of output: 153
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation in these files echo "=== apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx ===" rg -A 5 "const.*=.*await.*params" apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx echo -e "\n=== apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx ===" rg -A 5 "const.*=.*await.*params" apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx echo -e "\n=== apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/[id]/page.tsx ===" rg -A 5 "const.*=.*await.*params" apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/[id]/page.tsxLength of output: 871
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check component types and imports echo "=== apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx imports ===" rg "^import" apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx echo -e "\n=== Component type in layout.tsx ===" ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function $name($_) { $$$ }' apps/suite/app/[locale]/layout.tsx echo -e "\n=== apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx imports ===" rg "^import" apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsx echo -e "\n=== Component type in opt layout.tsx ===" ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function $name($_) { $$$ }' apps/opt/app/[locale]/layout.tsxLength of output: 1473
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check next-intl configuration and version echo "=== Package versions ===" fd package.json --exec grep -l "next-intl" {} \; --exec cat {} echo -e "\n=== next-intl config files ===" fd -e ts -e js -e json | grep -i "next-intl" echo -e "\n=== middleware.ts files ===" fd middleware.ts --exec cat {}Length of output: 5049
apps/opt/messages/en.json (1)
1-47: Verify key consistency across language files.The structure looks good, but we should ensure all keys are consistent across different language files.
✅ Verification successful
Keys are consistent across language files
The verification shows perfect key consistency between English (en.json) and Spanish (es.json) message files. Both files contain identical structure and keys across all sections (home, navbar, and footer).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for key consistency across language files # Expected: All language files should have the same keys # Find all JSON message files echo "Checking message files structure..." for file in $(fd -e json . apps/opt/messages); do echo "=== $file ===" # Extract and sort keys jq -r 'path(..|select(type=="string")) | join(".")' "$file" | sort doneLength of output: 1784
apps/opt/components/trips/TripTypeStep.tsx (2)
12-12: LGTM! Good move to TypeScript enumsThe switch from string literals to TypeScript enums improves type safety and maintainability.
Line range hint
27-36: Verify store initialization and error handlingThe store usage looks correct, but let's verify the initialization of
tripTypein the store to ensure we handle undefined states properly.✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the store implementation to verify the initialization and error handling. The previous results show the interface but we need to see the actual store creation and initialization.
Let me check the store creation and the component implementation to verify the handling of undefined states.
I need to verify the store creation and type definitions to make a final assessment about the undefined state handling.
Store implementation and error handling are properly handled
The implementation is safe and correct for the following reasons:
- The store is properly initialized with persist middleware
tripTypeis correctly typed asTripType | nullin the store state- The component handles the undefined state through the
findoperation which returns undefined if no match is found- The
setTripTypeaction is only called with validTripTypeenum values- The non-null assertion on
currenType!is safe as the UI prevents invalid states through controlled selection🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check store implementation and initialization rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "tripStore" -A 10Length of output: 3878
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the store implementation and initialization more thoroughly rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "create\(\([^)]*\)\s*=>\s*\{.*tripType" -A 10 # Also check for the store creation and exports ast-grep --pattern 'create<$_>($_)'Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler pattern to find the store implementation rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "export const.*tripStore.*create" -A 15 # Also check the actual usage of tripType in the component cat apps/opt/components/trips/TripTypeStep.tsxLength of output: 2395
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the store implementation one last time with a different pattern rg -g "*.ts" "export const.*useTripStore.*=.*create" -A 15 # And check the TripInterface to understand the type definitions cat apps/opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface.tsLength of output: 2502
apps/opt/components/trips/TripPriorityStep.tsx (2)
11-11: LGTM! Good use of TypeScript enum for type safety.The addition of the
TripPriorityenum import improves type safety and maintainability by replacing string literals with enumerated values.
66-66: LGTM! Good removal of unnecessary type assertion.The removal of
as stringtype assertion is appropriate as theisOptionSelectedfunction already returns a string type that's compatible with the icon's color prop.apps/opt/messages/es.json (2)
30-35: LGTM! Navigation translations are clear and consistent.The updated navbar translations are more professional and follow common Spanish UI patterns. The changes from "Iniciar" to "Iniciar sesión" and "Panel de control" to "Mis viajes" improve clarity.
1-46: Verify translation key usage across the application.Let's ensure these translation keys are properly referenced in the components.
✅ Verification successful
The previous command failed because the file type wasn't recognized. Let's try a broader search without type restrictions and also look for translation configuration files to understand how these translations are integrated into the application.
Let's examine the i18n setup and component files to understand how translations are integrated and used in the application.
Let's examine the app directory and layout files to find where these translations might be used, since we didn't find them in the components or pages directories.
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response. The code shows proper usage of translations through next-intl, with the translation keys being correctly used in the HomePage component and the layout properly configured for internationalization.
Translation keys are properly integrated and used in the application
The translation keys from
messages/es.jsonare correctly utilized through next-intl:
- Root layout properly loads and provides translations via
getMessages()- HomePage uses translations correctly with
getTranslations('home')- Proper i18n configuration in place with routing setup for both 'en' and 'es' locales
- Translation keys are accessed using the correct namespace structure (e.g.,
t('home.title3'))🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for translation key usage in the codebase echo "Checking translation key usage..." rg -t tsx -t jsx "('|\")(home|navbar|footer)\..*('|\")"Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for translation key usage with ripgrep, without file type restrictions echo "Checking translation key usage in all files..." rg "(home|navbar|footer)\.[a-zA-Z0-9-]+" --type-add 'web:*.{jsx,tsx,js,ts}' # Also check for any i18n/translation setup files echo -e "\nChecking for translation configuration..." fd -e js -e ts -e jsx -e tsx -e json . | grep -i "i18n\|translation\|lang"Length of output: 510
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of i18n configuration files in the opt app echo "Checking i18n configuration in opt app..." cat apps/opt/i18n/request.ts apps/opt/i18n/routing.ts # Let's also check for any components in the opt app that might use translations echo -e "\nChecking for potential translation usage in components..." fd . apps/opt/components -e tsx -e jsx -e ts -e js | xargs cat # Check for translation usage in pages echo -e "\nChecking for potential translation usage in pages..." fd . apps/opt/pages -e tsx -e jsx -e ts -e js | xargs catLength of output: 37966
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any translation usage in the app directory echo "Checking for translation usage in app directory..." fd . apps/opt/app -e tsx -e jsx -e ts -e js | xargs cat # Let's also check for any layout files that might use translations echo -e "\nChecking layout files..." fd layout apps/opt -e tsx -e jsx -e ts -e js | xargs cat # Let's check the root directory for any translation setup echo -e "\nChecking root configuration files..." fd . apps/opt -d 1 -e tsx -e jsx -e ts -e js | xargs catLength of output: 12740
apps/opt/components/trips/TripSections.tsx (3)
1-8: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and necessary.The imports are properly structured with clear separation between external libraries, internal interfaces, and local components.
60-70: LGTM! Search implementation is robust.The search functionality is well-implemented with:
- Case-insensitive matching
- Safe handling of optional destinies
- Proper type predicates
29-105: Verify error handling in parent components.Let's verify that this component is properly wrapped with error boundaries and loading states in parent components.
apps/opt/components/trips/TripCard.tsx (1)
1-8: LGTM! Clean imports and improved prop structure.The refactoring from individual props to a single trip object improves maintainability and follows React best practices.
packages/ui/styles/components/_trip-list.scss (3)
65-65: Verify the existence of thetext(misc)mixinEnsure that the
@include text(misc);mixin on line 65 is defined and imported correctly. If it's missing or incorrectly referenced, it could lead to compilation errors or unexpected styling issues.
59-60: Ensure appropriate font size scaling withremfunctionConfirm that the
rem(20);function correctly calculates the desired font size for&__title. Ifrem()is a custom function that converts pixel values toremunits, this is acceptable. Otherwise, using the CSSremunit directly (e.g.,font-size: 1.25rem;) might be more appropriate.
1-99: Well-structured and maintainable SCSS codeThe styling for the
.trip-listcomponent is well-organized, leveraging CSS Grid and media queries for responsiveness. The use of Sass features like variables, maps, and@eachloops enhances maintainability and reduces code duplication.
| export const TripsList = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <ul className="trip-list"> | ||
| {trips && trips.map((trip) => <TripCard key={trip.id} {...{ trip }} />)} | ||
| </ul> | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Several improvements recommended for better robustness and maintainability.
- Use optional chaining for cleaner null checking
- Add empty state handling
- Be explicit with prop passing
Consider applying these improvements:
export const TripsList = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => {
return (
<ul className="trip-list">
- {trips && trips.map((trip) => <TripCard key={trip.id} {...{ trip }} />)}
+ {trips?.map((trip) => (
+ <TripCard
+ key={trip.id}
+ trip={trip}
+ />
+ )) ?? <li className="empty-state">No trips available</li>}
</ul>
);
};The changes:
- Replace
&&with optional chaining (?.) and nullish coalescing (??) for better readability - Add empty state message when trips is null/undefined
- Pass
tripprop explicitly instead of using object spread for better maintainability
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const TripsList = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => { | |
| return ( | |
| <ul className="trip-list"> | |
| {trips && trips.map((trip) => <TripCard key={trip.id} {...{ trip }} />)} | |
| </ul> | |
| ); | |
| }; | |
| export const TripsList = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => { | |
| return ( | |
| <ul className="trip-list"> | |
| {trips?.map((trip) => ( | |
| <TripCard | |
| key={trip.id} | |
| trip={trip} | |
| /> | |
| )) ?? <li className="empty-state">No trips available</li>} | |
| </ul> | |
| ); | |
| }; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 8-8: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
| @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | |||
| import { UUID } from 'crypto'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a more frontend-appropriate UUID type.
The UUID type from Node's crypto module might not be the best choice for a frontend application. Consider using string type with a UUID validation pattern or importing types from dedicated UUID libraries like uuid package.
Apply this change:
-import { UUID } from 'crypto';
+type UUID = string; // TODO: Add runtime validation if needed📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import { UUID } from 'crypto'; | |
| type UUID = string; // TODO: Add runtime validation if needed |
| export const Card: React.FC<CardProps> = ({ title, children }) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <div className="card"> | ||
| <div className="card__container">{children}</div> | ||
| <div className="card__header"> | ||
| {typeof title === 'string' ? ( | ||
| <span className="card__title">{title}</span> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| title | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="card__content">{children}</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing accessibility with semantic HTML.
The component structure and conditional rendering look good, but consider these accessibility improvements:
export const Card: React.FC<CardProps> = ({ title, children }) => {
return (
- <div className="card">
- <div className="card__header">
+ <section className="card" role="region" aria-labelledby={typeof title === 'string' ? 'card-title' : undefined}>
+ <header className="card__header">
{typeof title === 'string' ? (
- <span className="card__title">{title}</span>
+ <h2 id="card-title" className="card__title">{title}</h2>
) : (
title
)}
- </div>
- <div className="card__content">{children}</div>
- </div>
+ </header>
+ <div className="card__content">{children}</div>
+ </section>
);
};Changes suggested:
- Use
sectionwithrole="region"instead of div for the card wrapper - Use semantic
headertag for the header section - Use
h2instead of span for string titles - Add proper ARIA labeling with
aria-labelledby
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const Card: React.FC<CardProps> = ({ title, children }) => { | |
| return ( | |
| <div className="card"> | |
| <div className="card__container">{children}</div> | |
| <div className="card__header"> | |
| {typeof title === 'string' ? ( | |
| <span className="card__title">{title}</span> | |
| ) : ( | |
| title | |
| )} | |
| </div> | |
| <div className="card__content">{children}</div> | |
| export const Card: React.FC<CardProps> = ({ title, children }) => { | |
| return ( | |
| <section className="card" role="region" aria-labelledby={typeof title === 'string' ? 'card-title' : undefined}> | |
| <header className="card__header"> | |
| {typeof title === 'string' ? ( | |
| <h2 id="card-title" className="card__title">{title}</h2> | |
| ) : ( | |
| title | |
| )} | |
| </header> | |
| <div className="card__content">{children}</div> | |
| </section> | |
| ); | |
| }; |
| type TripsDataWrapperProps = { | ||
| children: (data: { trips: any[] }) => React.ReactNode; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve type safety by replacing any[] with proper Trip interface.
The current type declaration uses any[] which bypasses TypeScript's type checking capabilities. Since there's a Trip interface available in the codebase, we should utilize it for better type safety.
Apply this change:
+import { Trip } from '@opt/types';
type TripsDataWrapperProps = {
- children: (data: { trips: any[] }) => React.ReactNode;
+ children: (data: { trips: Trip[] }) => React.ReactNode;
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type TripsDataWrapperProps = { | |
| children: (data: { trips: any[] }) => React.ReactNode; | |
| }; | |
| import { Trip } from '@opt/types'; | |
| type TripsDataWrapperProps = { | |
| children: (data: { trips: Trip[] }) => React.ReactNode; | |
| }; |
| if (isLoading) return <div>Loading...</div>; | ||
| if (isError) return <div>Error loading trips.</div>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error and loading states with more informative feedback.
The current implementation uses basic div elements for loading and error states. Consider implementing:
- A proper loading skeleton or spinner component
- More detailed error messaging with potential recovery actions
Consider implementing this enhancement:
- if (isLoading) return <div>Loading...</div>;
- if (isError) return <div>Error loading trips.</div>;
+ if (isLoading) return <LoadingSkeleton />; // Import from your UI component library
+ if (isError) return (
+ <ErrorMessage
+ message="Unable to load trips at this time"
+ action={() => window.location.reload()}
+ actionText="Try Again"
+ />
+ );Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const upcomingDate = | ||
| upcomingTrips.length! > 0 | ||
| ? format.dateTime(upcomingTrips[0].startDate!, 'd MMM, yyyy') | ||
| : 'No upcoming trips'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unnecessary non-null assertion and improve type safety.
The non-null assertion on length! is unnecessary, and the date comparison could be more robust.
- const upcomingDate =
- upcomingTrips.length! > 0
- ? format.dateTime(upcomingTrips[0].startDate!, 'd MMM, yyyy')
- : 'No upcoming trips';
+ const upcomingDate =
+ upcomingTrips.length > 0 && upcomingTrips[0].startDate
+ ? format.dateTime(upcomingTrips[0].startDate, 'd MMM, yyyy')
+ : 'No upcoming trips';📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const upcomingDate = | |
| upcomingTrips.length! > 0 | |
| ? format.dateTime(upcomingTrips[0].startDate!, 'd MMM, yyyy') | |
| : 'No upcoming trips'; | |
| const upcomingDate = | |
| upcomingTrips.length > 0 && upcomingTrips[0].startDate | |
| ? format.dateTime(upcomingTrips[0].startDate, 'd MMM, yyyy') | |
| : 'No upcoming trips'; |
| const totalParticipants = | ||
| trips?.reduce((sum, trip) => sum + trip.members?.length!, 0) ?? 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential runtime error with undefined members.
The non-null assertion on members?.length! could cause runtime errors if members is undefined.
- const totalParticipants =
- trips?.reduce((sum, trip) => sum + trip.members?.length!, 0) ?? 0;
+ const totalParticipants =
+ trips?.reduce((sum, trip) => sum + (trip.members?.length ?? 0), 0) ?? 0;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const totalParticipants = | |
| trips?.reduce((sum, trip) => sum + trip.members?.length!, 0) ?? 0; | |
| const totalParticipants = | |
| trips?.reduce((sum, trip) => sum + (trip.members?.length ?? 0), 0) ?? 0; |
| import { TripStatus } from '@opt/core/interfaces/TripInterface'; | ||
| import { Card } from '@repo/ui'; | ||
|
|
||
| export const TripStats = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add prop validation and default value.
The component should handle cases where trips is undefined or null to prevent runtime errors.
-export const TripStats = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => {
+export const TripStats = ({ trips = [] }: { trips: Trip[] }) => {| return ( | ||
| <div className="dashboard__stats"> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={ | ||
| <> | ||
| <MapPin /> | ||
| <span className="card__title">Total Trips</span> | ||
| </> | ||
| } | ||
| > | ||
| <span className="card__number">{trips?.length}</span> | ||
| </Card> | ||
|
|
||
| <Card | ||
| title={ | ||
| <> | ||
| <span className="card__title">Next Trip</span> | ||
| <Calendar className="card__icon" /> | ||
| </> | ||
| } | ||
| > | ||
| <span className="card__number">{upcomingDate}</span> | ||
| </Card> | ||
|
|
||
| <Card | ||
| title={ | ||
| <> | ||
| <span className="card__title">Total Budget</span> | ||
| <DollarSign className="card__icon" /> | ||
| </> | ||
| } | ||
| > | ||
| <span className="card__number">${totalBudget}</span> | ||
| <span className="card__note"> | ||
| Spent: ${totalExpenses} ( | ||
| {((totalExpenses! / totalBudget!) * 100).toFixed(1)}%) | ||
| </span> | ||
| </Card> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={ | ||
| <> | ||
| <span className="card__title">Avg. Budget/Person</span> | ||
| <Users className="card__icon" /> | ||
| </> | ||
| } | ||
| > | ||
| <span className="card__number"> | ||
| ${averageBudgetPerPerson.toFixed(2)} | ||
| </span> | ||
| </Card> | ||
|
|
||
| <Card | ||
| title={ | ||
| <> | ||
| <span className="card__title">Avg. Expenses/Person</span> | ||
| <Users className="card__icon" /> | ||
| </> | ||
| } | ||
| > | ||
| <span className="card__number"> | ||
| $ | ||
| {averageExpensesPerPerson | ||
| ? averageExpensesPerPerson.toFixed(2) | ||
| : 'N/A'} | ||
| </span> | ||
| </Card> | ||
|
|
||
| <Card | ||
| title={ | ||
| <> | ||
| <span className="card__title">Total Participants</span> | ||
| <Users className="card__icon" /> | ||
| </> | ||
| } | ||
| > | ||
| <span className="card__number">{totalParticipants}</span> | ||
| </Card> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance number formatting and accessibility.
The component could benefit from proper currency formatting and improved accessibility.
- Use the formatter for consistent currency display:
- <span className="card__number">${totalBudget}</span>
+ <span className="card__number">
+ {format.number(totalBudget, { style: 'currency', currency: 'USD' })}
+ </span>- Add aria-labels for better accessibility:
- <div className="dashboard__stats">
+ <div className="dashboard__stats" role="region" aria-label="Trip Statistics">- Consider extracting the Card title pattern into a reusable component to reduce duplication.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| &__item { | ||
| margin-bottom: rem(16); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing margin-bottom from &__item to rely on grid gap
Since the .trip-list grid utilizes the gap property to manage spacing between items, the margin-bottom: rem(16); on &__item may introduce redundant or inconsistent spacing. Removing this margin will ensure that the grid's gap setting uniformly controls the spacing.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant margin:
&__item {
- margin-bottom: rem(16);
border-radius: rem(8);
padding: rem(16);
@include shadow-sm;
@include background-color;
cursor: pointer;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| &__item { | |
| margin-bottom: rem(16); | |
| &__item { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/opt/components/dashboard/DashboardContent.tsx (1)
1-20: Good implementation with opportunity for common loading patternsThe DashboardContent component is well-structured with proper conditional rendering for loading and error states. The layout structure with search, stats, and sections is logically organized.
I notice both this component and TripsContent use identical loading/error handling patterns. Consider extracting this into a reusable pattern to maintain consistency across components.
You could consider creating a reusable wrapper component for the loading/error states:
// Example of a reusable LoadingErrorWrapper component const LoadingErrorWrapper = ({ isLoading, isError, errorMessage = 'Error loading data.', children }) => { if (isLoading) return <div>Loading...</div>; if (isError) return <div>{errorMessage}</div>; return children; }; // Then your component could be simplified to: export const DashboardContent = () => { const { trips, isLoading, isError } = useTripsContext(); return ( <LoadingErrorWrapper isLoading={isLoading} isError={isError} errorMessage="Error loading trips." > <> <div className="dashboard__search"> <TripSearch /> </div> <TripStats trips={trips} /> <TripSections trips={trips} /> </> </LoadingErrorWrapper> ); };apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1)
6-10: Consider adding loading or error handling at this level.If
TripsProviderfetches data asynchronously, you may want to provide a loading indicator or error fallback aroundDashboardContentto enhance user experience and guard against null data.apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/page.tsx (1)
6-8: Add loading or error states.Expose the
TripsProviderloading and error states here if the data fetch might fail or be slow, improving the user flow.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/page.tsx(1 hunks)apps/opt/components/dashboard/DashboardContent.tsx(1 hunks)apps/opt/components/dashboard/index.tsx(1 hunks)apps/opt/components/providers/TripsProvider.tsx(1 hunks)apps/opt/components/trips/TripsContent.tsx(1 hunks)apps/opt/components/trips/index.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/opt/components/dashboard/index.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/opt/app/[locale]/page.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build_apps
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/opt/components/trips/TripsContent.tsx (1)
1-12: Well-structured component with clean rendering logicThe TripsContent component is well-implemented using a clean React functional component structure. It correctly handles loading and error states while leveraging the trips context.
A few observations:
- The component follows the "client" directive, ensuring proper hydration with React
- It correctly implements conditional rendering for loading and error states
- The component properly uses the context API via the custom hook
apps/opt/components/providers/TripsProvider.tsx (3)
1-9: Proper setup for context providerThe imports and hook initialization are well structured. The client directive ensures proper hydration in the Next.js environment.
14-22: Provider implementation looks goodThe TripsProvider component is well-implemented with proper error handling by providing an empty array as fallback when trips is undefined.
24-30: Good context hook implementation with error boundaryThe useTripsContext hook correctly implements error handling when used outside of the provider context.
apps/opt/components/trips/index.tsx (1)
1-17: Clear and organized exportsThe export structure is clean and well-organized, making it easy to understand what components are available from this module. The removal of TripsContainer and addition of the new components aligns with the context-based architecture described in the PR summary.
apps/opt/app/[locale]/dashboard/page.tsx (1)
1-2: All good with your import statements.These imports from
@opt/components/dashboardand@opt/components/providers/TripsProviderare well-organized and align with your modular approach.apps/opt/app/[locale]/trips/page.tsx (1)
1-2: Imports look good.Using
TripsProviderandTripsContenttogether helps modularize data fetching from presentation.
| const TripsContext = createContext< | ||
| { trips: any[]; isLoading: boolean; isError: boolean } | undefined | ||
| >(undefined); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding TypeScript interface for trips data
The context is initialized with a generic any[] type for trips, which loses the benefits of TypeScript's type checking.
Define a proper interface for trip data instead of using any[]:
+interface Trip {
+ id: string;
+ // add other trip properties here
+}
+
+interface TripsContextType {
+ trips: Trip[];
+ isLoading: boolean;
+ isError: boolean;
+}
const TripsContext = createContext<
- { trips: any[]; isLoading: boolean; isError: boolean } | undefined
+ TripsContextType | undefined
>(undefined);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const TripsContext = createContext< | |
| { trips: any[]; isLoading: boolean; isError: boolean } | undefined | |
| >(undefined); | |
| interface Trip { | |
| id: string; | |
| // add other trip properties here | |
| } | |
| interface TripsContextType { | |
| trips: Trip[]; | |
| isLoading: boolean; | |
| isError: boolean; | |
| } | |
| const TripsContext = createContext< | |
| TripsContextType | undefined | |
| >(undefined); |
| import { TripsProvider } from '@opt/components/providers/TripsProvider'; | ||
|
|
||
| export default async function DashboardPage() { | ||
| export default function Dashboard() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Confirm no leftover references to async usage.
Previously, you had DashboardPage as an async function. Changing it to a standard function is fine, but please ensure no upstream code still relies on an async export.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search potential references to the old async function name.
fd -e tsx -e ts --exec rg "DashboardPage" {}Length of output: 94
Action Required: Remove or Update Leftover Async Declaration
It appears that a leftover async export for DashboardPage is still present in the codebase:
- Detected Code:
export default async function DashboardPage() {
- Impact:
This suggests that somewhere in the repository, the old async function is still defined. Please verify if any upstream code depends on the async behavior ofDashboardPage. If not needed, remove or refactor this leftover export to align with the new synchronous implementation to avoid any unintended side effects.
… and maintainability
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
apps/opt/components/trips/TripSections.tsx (3)
11-28: Consider improving empty state message handling.The empty state message directly concatenates the title prop, which could lead to awkward messages when the title is a JSX element (with icons).
Consider this improvement:
- <p className="section__message">You have no {title}</p> + <p className="section__message"> + {typeof title === 'string' + ? `You have no ${title}` + : 'No trips found'} + </p>Also, consider wrapping the TripsList component in an error boundary to gracefully handle potential rendering errors.
33-59: Improve date handling and null safety in trip categorization.The trip categorization logic has potential issues:
- Date comparison doesn't handle timezone differences
- No validation for undefined startDate in the upcoming trips logic
Consider this safer implementation:
} else if ( trip.status === TripStatus.PLANNING && - trip.startDate && - new Date(trip.startDate) > new Date() + trip.startDate != null && + new Date(trip.startDate).setHours(0, 0, 0, 0) > + new Date().setHours(0, 0, 0, 0) ) {
84-103: Remove unsafe non-null assertions.The use of non-null assertions (!) is dangerous as it bypasses TypeScript's type checking. categorizedTrips could be undefined.
Replace the non-null assertions with safe defaults:
- trips={categorizedTrips?.current!} + trips={categorizedTrips?.current ?? []} - trips={categorizedTrips?.upcoming!} + trips={categorizedTrips?.upcoming ?? []} - trips={categorizedTrips?.past!} + trips={categorizedTrips?.past ?? []}
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/ui/tsconfig.json (1)
2-2: Updated Include Path: Narrowing the Compilation Scope
Changing the"include"property to["./src"]effectively limits the TypeScript compilation to the source directory. Ensure that this does not unintentionally exclude other necessary files (e.g., tests or configuration files) that may reside outside"./src".apps/opt/components/trips/TripSections.tsx (2)
30-72: Memoize derived values for better performance.The component recalculates
categorizedTripsandfilteredTripson every render. Consider using React'suseMemoanduseCallbackto prevent unnecessary calculations.+ import { useMemo, useCallback } from 'react'; export const TripSections = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => { const { searchTerm } = useTripStore(); - const categorizedTrips = trips?.reduce( + const categorizedTrips = useMemo(() => (trips || []).reduce( ( acc: { current: Trip[]; upcoming: Trip[]; past: Trip[]; }, trip: Trip, ) => { // ... existing logic return acc; }, { current: [], upcoming: [], past: [] }, - ); + ), [trips]); const searchTermLower = searchTerm.toLowerCase(); - const searchPredicate = (trip: Trip) => { + const searchPredicate = useCallback((trip: Trip) => { return ( trip.title.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower) || trip.destinies?.some((destiny) => destiny.name?.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower), ) ); - }; + }, [searchTermLower]); - const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate); + const filteredTrips = useMemo(() => + trips?.filter(searchPredicate) ?? [], + [trips, searchPredicate] + );
73-75: Simplify conditional rendering with null coalescing.Replace the ternary condition that returns an empty array with a more concise null coalescing operator.
return searchTerm ? ( - <TripSection title="Search results" trips={filteredTrips || []} /> + <TripSection title="Search results" trips={filteredTrips} /> ) : (
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
apps/native/assets/adaptive-icon.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngapps/native/assets/favicon.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngapps/native/assets/icon.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngapps/native/assets/splash.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
apps/native/.expo-shared/assets.json(0 hunks)apps/native/.gitignore(0 hunks)apps/native/App.tsx(0 hunks)apps/native/README.md(0 hunks)apps/native/app.json(0 hunks)apps/native/babel.config.js(0 hunks)apps/native/index.js(0 hunks)apps/native/metro.config.js(0 hunks)apps/native/package.json(0 hunks)apps/native/tsconfig.json(0 hunks)apps/opt/components/trips/TripSections.tsx(1 hunks)apps/opt/next-env.d.ts(1 hunks)apps/opt/package.json(2 hunks)apps/suite/next-env.d.ts(1 hunks)apps/suite/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web/next-env.d.ts(1 hunks)apps/web/package.json(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)packages/ui/package.json(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/Card.tsx(1 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/EyeIconToggle.tsx(2 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/ThemeSwitcher.tsx(3 hunks)packages/ui/src/components/button.tsx(0 hunks)packages/ui/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (11)
- apps/native/App.tsx
- apps/native/babel.config.js
- apps/native/.expo-shared/assets.json
- apps/native/README.md
- apps/native/package.json
- apps/native/index.js
- apps/native/tsconfig.json
- apps/native/.gitignore
- apps/native/metro.config.js
- packages/ui/src/components/button.tsx
- apps/native/app.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- apps/web/next-env.d.ts
- apps/suite/next-env.d.ts
- packages/ui/src/components/Card.tsx
- apps/opt/next-env.d.ts
- apps/opt/package.json
- packages/ui/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
apps/opt/components/trips/TripSections.tsx (2)
apps/opt/components/trips/TripsList.tsx (1)
TripsList(5-11)apps/opt/store/tripStore.ts (1)
useTripStore(42-60)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
packages/ui/tsconfig.json (4)
10-10: Module Resolution Change: Node Resolution
Switching"moduleResolution"from a bundler-specific option to"node"aligns with standard Node environments and improves compatibility with many common libraries. Verify that there are no dependencies on the previous bundler resolution method to avoid unexpected module resolution issues.
13-13: JSX Configuration Update: Modern React Transform
Updating"jsx"from"preserve"to"react-jsx"enables the new automatic JSX runtime available in React 17 and above. This change simplifies the code by eliminating the need to import React in scope for JSX.
14-14: Library Specification: Enhanced ES and DOM Support
Adding the"lib": ["dom", "dom.iterable", "esnext"]property ensures that TypeScript includes up-to-date definitions for modern JavaScript features and DOM APIs. This enhancement improves type safety and supports the latest ECMAScript capabilities.
15-15: Types Inclusion: Improved Environment Typings
Introducing the"types": ["react", "next", "node"]property guarantees that necessary type definitions for React, Next.js, and Node environments are included. This change will help catch type mismatches early and enhance development in multi-environment setups.packages/ui/src/components/EyeIconToggle.tsx (3)
4-5: Improved type safety with new IconComponent type alias.Adding this type alias for SVG components provides better type checking and consistency.
15-17: Good refactoring to use the new IconComponent type.Casting the icons to the specific type enhances type safety and makes the code more maintainable.
20-20: Updated rendering to use typed icon components.This change completes the refactoring by using the new typed constants in the JSX.
packages/ui/src/components/ThemeSwitcher.tsx (3)
6-7: Improved type safety with IconComponent type alias.Adding this type alias for SVG components ensures consistency with the EyeIconToggle component and improves type checking.
10-13: Refactored theme icons with improved typing.Renaming from lowercase
iconto capitalizedIconand adding proper typing improves code consistency and follows React component naming conventions.
32-32: Updated icon usage with new property names.These changes correctly implement the property name update from
icontoIcon.Also applies to: 47-47
package.json (1)
40-40:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Updated testing library dependency.
The removal of jest-dom and upgrade of react testing library to v15 indicates a potential change in testing approach. Ensure that any existing tests have been updated to work with the new version.
Run the following to verify existing tests still work with the updated dependencies:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are tests that might rely on jest-dom matchers grep -r "toBeInTheDocument\|toHaveAttribute\|toHaveClass" --include="*.test.*" --include="*.spec.*" .Length of output: 103
Testing Libraries Dependency Update Verification
The grep command did not return any matches for jest-dom matchers, suggesting that the tests may not rely on the removed functionality. However, since the absence of output is a low-confidence indicator, please manually verify that none of the tests depend on those matchers or require updates due to the react testing library upgrade.
apps/suite/package.json (2)
6-6: Added Turbo mode for faster development.Using the
--turboflag should improve development experience with faster refresh times.
14-16:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Major dependency updates to Next.js 15 and React 19.
These are significant version upgrades that may introduce breaking changes. Ensure that the application has been thoroughly tested with these new versions.
Please verify compatibility with these major version upgrades:
Also applies to: 22-24
🌐 Web query:
What are the breaking changes in Next.js 15 and React 19?💡 Result:
Next.js 15 and React 19 introduce several breaking changes that developers must address during migration. Here's a structured overview of the key updates:
Next.js 15 Breaking Changes
1. Async Request APIs
Dynamic APIs likecookies(),headers(), andsearchParamsnow require async/await syntax. This change enables server-side content preparation before requests arrive[4][7][10].2. Caching Defaults
fetchrequests and GET Route Handlers are no longer cached by default- Client navigations now default to dynamic rendering
force-dynamicsetsno-storefor fetch cache[4][7][10]3. Image Component Updates
- Removed
squooshin favor ofsharpas optional dependency- Default
Content-Dispositionchanged toattachment- Error handling for malformed
srcpaths with leading/trailing spaces[4][10]4. Security Improvements
- Server Actions now use unguessable, non-deterministic IDs
- Dead code elimination for unused Server Actions[1][4]
5. Deprecated Feature Removal
@next/fontpackage replaced with built-innext/fontreact-servercondition applied to limit React API imports in Middleware- Auto-instrumentation for Speed Insights removed (requires @vercel/speed-insights package)[4][10]
6. Configuration Changes
bundlePagesRouterDependenciesreplaces experimentalbundlePagesExternalsserverExternalPackagesreplacesserverComponentsExternalPackagesswcMinifyandoutputFileTracingenabled by default[4][10]React 19 Breaking Changes
1. Mandatory JSX Transform
New JSX transform required for features like directrefprops[2][5][8]2. Removed Legacy APIs
ReactDOM.render/hydratereplaced withcreateRoot/hydrateRoot- String refs and legacy context API deprecated[2][5][8]
3. Error Handling Updates
- New
onCaughtErrorandonUncaughtErrormethods- Error reporting consolidated to single console error[2][8]
4. Form Handling Changes
useFormStatedeprecated in favor ofuseActionState- New form submission lifecycle methods[8][10]
5. Package Structure
- UMD builds removed in favor of ESM modules
react-test-rendererdeprecated[2][5]Shared Migration Considerations
Codemods: Both ecosystems provide automated upgrade tools:
# Next.js npx @next/codemod@canary upgrade latest # React npx codemod@latest react/19/migration-recipeDependency Conflicts: May require
npm install --forcedue to peer dependency issues during transition[9]TypeScript: Requires updated
@types/reactand@types/react-dompackages[10]Developers should review official migration guides and test applications thoroughly after upgrading. The changes prioritize performance, security, and modern web standards while streamlining developer workflows[1][4][7][10].
Citations:
- 1: https://www.wisp.blog/blog/nextjs-15-is-out-whats-new-and-what-broke
- 2: https://www.nextsteps.dev/posts/exploring-react-19
- 3: https://nextjs.org/blog/next-15-1
- 4: https://nextjs.org/blog/next-15
- 5: https://dev.to/manojspace/react-19-vs-react-18-performance-improvements-and-migration-guide-5h85
- 6: https://sanitypress.dev/blog/upgrading-to-react-19-nextjs-15-tailwind-4
- 7: https://javascript.plainenglish.io/breaking-changes-in-next-js-15-the-ultimate-migration-guide-18f183dad64b
- 8: https://react.dev/blog/2024/12/05/react-19
- 9: https://dev.to/shu12388y/resolving-breaking-changes-in-nextjs-15-and-react-19-with-npm-a-developers-guide-1oag
- 10: https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/upgrading/version-15
Action Required: Confirm Compatibility with Next.js 15 and React 19 Upgrades
The dependency upgrades in
apps/suite/package.json(lines 14–16, and similarly lines 22–24) introduce several breaking changes that can affect your application:
Next.js 15
- Async APIs & Caching: Dynamic API calls (e.g.,
cookies(),headers()) now require async/await, and caching defaults have shifted—this may affect server-side rendering and data fetching behavior.- Image Component & Config Changes: Removal of the
squooshdependency, updates to image error handling, and other configuration adjustments (e.g., changes in Next.js font handling) may require code modifications.React 19
- JSX Transform & Legacy API Removal: The new mandatory JSX transform and the removal of outdated APIs (
ReactDOM.render/hydrate) demand a review of component mounting and rendering logic.- Error Handling & Form Updates: New mechanisms for error management and updated form lifecycle methods could impact existing error boundaries and form handling code.
Recommendation:
- Apply the provided migration codemods if not already done:
# For Next.js npx @next/codemod@canary upgrade latest # For React npx codemod@latest react/19/migration-recipe- Rigorously test all affected areas to ensure compatibility, especially focusing on API routes, server-side rendering logic, and components relying on legacy React APIs.
- Verify similar considerations for dependency updates noted in lines 22–24.
apps/web/package.json (6)
6-6: Dev Script Enhancement: Inclusion of '--turbo' Flag
The dev script now includes the--turboflag, which may improve build performance during development. Please ensure that this behavior is well documented and that all team members are aware of any implications this flag might have.
14-14: Dependency Upgrade: Next.js Version Update
Next.js has been upgraded to^15.2.4. This upgrade should bring performance improvements and new features; however, please verify that there are no breaking changes affecting your application.
15-15: Dependency Upgrade: React Version Update
React has been updated to version^19.0.0. Since this is a major version bump, ensure that your existing components and libraries are fully compatible with React 19 and that all necessary tests pass.
16-16: Dependency Upgrade: React-DOM Version Update
The React-DOM dependency is now at^19.0.0to align with the React update. Please confirm that UI rendering, hydration, and any React-DOM–specific functionality work as expected with the new version.
22-22: Dev Dependency Update: @types/react-dom Version Update
The type definitions forreact-domhave been updated to^19.0.0. Ensure that this change does not introduce any TypeScript type conflicts and that your development environment properly recognizes the new types.
24-24: Dev Dependency Update: ESLint-Config-Next Version Update
ESLint configuration for Next.js has been updated to^15.2.4. Verify that the updated linting rules integrate seamlessly with your project’s coding style and do not cause unexpected lint errors after the upgrade.
| export const TripSections = ({ trips }: { trips: Trip[] }) => { | ||
| const { searchTerm } = useTripStore(); | ||
|
|
||
| const categorizedTrips = trips?.reduce( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null check for trips before using reduce.
The current code uses optional chaining with trips?.reduce, but doesn't handle the case where trips is undefined. This could lead to categorizedTrips being undefined, which would cause issues later in the component.
- const categorizedTrips = trips?.reduce(
+ const categorizedTrips = (trips || []).reduce(📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const categorizedTrips = trips?.reduce( | |
| const categorizedTrips = (trips || []).reduce( |
| ); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use null coalescing operator for filteredTrips.
If trips is undefined, filteredTrips will also be undefined, which could cause runtime errors. Use the null coalescing operator to ensure it's always an array.
- const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate);
+ const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate) ?? [];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate); | |
| const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate) ?? []; |
| const searchTermLower = searchTerm.toLowerCase(); | ||
| const searchPredicate = (trip: Trip) => { | ||
| return ( | ||
| trip.title.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower) || | ||
| trip.destinies?.some((destiny) => | ||
| destiny.name?.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower), | ||
| ) | ||
| ); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null safety for the destinies array.
The search predicate doesn't properly handle the case where destinies might be undefined or a destiny's name might be null.
const searchPredicate = (trip: Trip) => {
return (
trip.title.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower) ||
- trip.destinies?.some((destiny) =>
- destiny.name?.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower),
- )
+ (trip.destinies || []).some((destiny) =>
+ (destiny.name || '').toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower)
+ )
);
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const searchTermLower = searchTerm.toLowerCase(); | |
| const searchPredicate = (trip: Trip) => { | |
| return ( | |
| trip.title.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower) || | |
| trip.destinies?.some((destiny) => | |
| destiny.name?.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower), | |
| ) | |
| ); | |
| }; | |
| const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate); | |
| const searchTermLower = searchTerm.toLowerCase(); | |
| const searchPredicate = (trip: Trip) => { | |
| return ( | |
| trip.title.toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower) || | |
| (trip.destinies || []).some((destiny) => | |
| (destiny.name || '').toLowerCase().includes(searchTermLower) | |
| ) | |
| ); | |
| }; | |
| const filteredTrips = trips?.filter(searchPredicate); |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
TripSearch,TripSections, andTripStats.DashboardContentcomponent to streamline the dashboard layout and improve user experience.Refactor
Tripscomponent to utilize a provider-consumer model for better state management.Style
Chores