Document comprehensive verification report - identify key discrepancies between docs and code #1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR provides a comprehensive verification report comparing the documentation in
/docswith the actual code implementation. No code changes were made per the issue requirements - this is purely a documentation audit.Key Findings
✅ Areas Where Documentation Accurately Matches Code
/run,/graph,/healthz, artifact endpoints) are correctly implemented❌ Major Discrepancies Identified
Repository Structure (ROADMAP.md): Documents an outdated structure with
FlowTime.Engine/FlowTime.Service/FlowTime.Testsbut actual structure usesFlowTime.Core/FlowTime.API/FlowTime.Cli/FlowTime.Adapters.SyntheticExamples Directory: Documents 13 example directories that don't exist (expr/, pmf/, scenario/, routing/, batch/, backlog/, multiclass/, gold/, sweep/, templating/, dlq/, uncertainty/) while only
hello/andshift-test/actually existSchema Inconsistency: The
run.schema.jsonrequires aneventsfield that is not actually generated in run.json artifactsMissing Documentation: The
tests/directory structure is not documented despite being a significant part of the codebaseVerification Process
The verification was conducted by:
Report Location
The complete verification report is available at
/tmp/documentation_verification_report.mdwith detailed analysis and recommendations for each discrepancy found.Overall Assessment
The documentation is generally well-maintained and mostly accurate, with the main issues being outdated structural information rather than functional specification errors. The core contracts, API behavior, and artifact formats are correctly documented and implemented.
Original prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.