Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Sep 26, 2025

This PR provides a comprehensive verification report comparing the documentation in /docs with the actual code implementation. No code changes were made per the issue requirements - this is purely a documentation audit.

Key Findings

✅ Areas Where Documentation Accurately Matches Code

  • CLI Implementation: All documented CLI options, usage examples, and help text match the actual implementation
  • API Endpoints: All documented endpoints (/run, /graph, /healthz, artifact endpoints) are correctly implemented
  • Artifact Structure: The contracts.md specifications match the actual output format for run.json, manifest.json, and series structure
  • Schema Consistency: Schema version 1 is consistently used across documentation and code
  • Milestone Claims: Most milestone completion claims (SVC-M0, UI-M0, SYN-M0, M1, M1.5) appear accurate based on implemented functionality
  • Test Coverage: Extensive test coverage exists as claimed, including determinism tests, performance tests, and API integration tests

❌ Major Discrepancies Identified

  1. Repository Structure (ROADMAP.md): Documents an outdated structure with FlowTime.Engine/FlowTime.Service/FlowTime.Tests but actual structure uses FlowTime.Core/FlowTime.API/FlowTime.Cli/FlowTime.Adapters.Synthetic

  2. Examples Directory: Documents 13 example directories that don't exist (expr/, pmf/, scenario/, routing/, batch/, backlog/, multiclass/, gold/, sweep/, templating/, dlq/, uncertainty/) while only hello/ and shift-test/ actually exist

  3. Schema Inconsistency: The run.schema.json requires an events field that is not actually generated in run.json artifacts

  4. Missing Documentation: The tests/ directory structure is not documented despite being a significant part of the codebase

Verification Process

The verification was conducted by:

  • Building and testing the codebase to ensure current functionality
  • Comparing documented repository structure with actual file system
  • Running CLI commands to verify help text and options match documentation
  • Examining API endpoints against documented specifications
  • Generating actual artifacts and comparing with documented schemas
  • Cross-referencing milestone completion claims with implemented features
  • Validating test coverage claims against actual test files

Report Location

The complete verification report is available at /tmp/documentation_verification_report.md with detailed analysis and recommendations for each discrepancy found.

Overall Assessment

The documentation is generally well-maintained and mostly accurate, with the main issues being outdated structural information rather than functional specification errors. The core contracts, API behavior, and artifact formats are correctly documented and implemented.

Original prompt

verify whether what is in /docs matches with the code.
Do not change any code.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] verify whether what is in /docs matches with the code. Do not change any code. Document comprehensive verification report - identify key discrepancies between docs and code Sep 26, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from 23min September 26, 2025 07:31
@23min 23min closed this Jan 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants