Skip to content

Update Rust crate ureq to v3.2.0 - autoclosed#32

Closed
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/ureq-3.x-lockfile
Closed

Update Rust crate ureq to v3.2.0 - autoclosed#32
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/ureq-3.x-lockfile

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 5, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
ureq dependencies minor 3.1.23.2.0

Release Notes

algesten/ureq (ureq)

v3.2.0

Compare Source

  • Strip Content-Encoding/Content-Length headers after decompression #​1156
    • Timeout per resolved ip for try_connect #​1152
    • Fix body header bug on redirect #​1140
    • ureq-proto 0.5.3 to fix unsolicited 100-continue #​1139
    • Make socks5:// locally resolve before calling proxy #​1138
    • Add socks5h:// which DOESN'T locally resolve before calling proxy #​1138

v3.1.4

Compare Source

  • Set content-type with new Multipart form #​1133

v3.1.3

Compare Source

  • Fix short read with multi-byte charset #​1131
    • Replace rustls-pemfile usage with rustls-pki-types #​1122
    • Support for env NO_PROXY and proxy config #​1118
    • Experimental multi-part form support #​1102

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update Rust crate ureq to v3.2.0 Update Rust crate ureq to v3.2.0 - autoclosed Mar 11, 2026
@renovate renovate bot closed this Mar 11, 2026
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/ureq-3.x-lockfile branch March 11, 2026 06:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants