Skip to content

Evaluation results on the trained weights are not identical to the paper #29

@goldentimecoolk

Description

@goldentimecoolk

Hi, thanks for your amazing work. I evaluated your trained weights on refer-kitti-v1 and v2. The results are:

 - HOTA       DetA       AssA
v1 50.856    39.303    65.973
v2 34.674    22.465    53.628

They are slightly lower than the scores in the paper. Is this a normal fluctuation?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions