forked from TravelMapping/HighwayData
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
Is there a convention as to whether to use SR### style labels, or just the local street names? I would think SR###, as these are signed in almost every GMSV example I've looked at... Either way, I think consistency in this regard would be good.
VA7:
FirWooDr -> SR656?
SniTpk -> SR734?
delete +x05 (and maybe even +x04)
mark SR643 as closed
LanBlvd -> SR901 or SR901/2400
LouCouPkwy -> SR607
CityCenPkwy -> SR1570 or CityCenBlvd
CasPkwy -> SR1794?
+x10: replace with a point at SR676_N / TowRd (for connection to VA267)
US50: recenter on both routes. Or maybe I'm just being too anal.
VA402: Why SemRd and not VA420?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels