SnipLua break rule of one file one plugin.

[xoac]

LuaSnip is defined in LSP/init.lua but should have a separate file (according to rule one file one plugin):

nvim/lua/packer/plugs/lsp/init.lua

Lines 10 to 19 in 0c44194

	{
	"L3MON4D3/LuaSnip",
	requires = {
	{ "saadparwaiz1/cmp_luasnip" }, -- Snippets source for nvim-cmp
	{ "rafamadriz/friendly-snippets" }, -- Snippets collection for a set of different programming languages for faster development.
	},
	config = function()
	require("luasnip/loaders/from_vscode").lazy_load()
	end,
	}, -- Snippets plugin

I do not know how to achieve it at this moment since I can call cmp.setup() only once and I want to register snippets with LSP.

[ur4ltz]

Many plugins are dependent. You will not be able to do what you are going to do.

You have chosen a complex folder layout.

Use something simpler.
lua / plugin /
lua / config /

P.S.
Life is so short to waste on shit!

[ur4ltz]

{
cmp_luasnip require LuaSnip,
LuaSnip require friendly-snippets
}

[LudoPinelli]

Ideally, to follow the rule one plugin one file, lspconfig and cmp should be separated as well but it's very unlikely that you want an lsp without a completion system so it makes sense. I think it's better to break one rule to keep the benefits you're looking for! Similarly, someone working on Neovim who wants to have a snippet engine but no completion system it's probably uncommon.

Many plugins are dependent. You will not be able to do what you are going to do.

You have chosen a complex folder layout.

Use something simpler. lua / plugin / lua / config /

P.S. Life is so short to waste on shit!

I find that this system is on the contrary easier to understand and very clever. It makes maintaining and updating the configuration much simpler than the usual mess where you have to grep things to find every mention of a plugin scattered trhough the all config folder each time you just want to change the setting/disable/uninstall it.
Simplifying the Neovim lua configuration is far to be a "waste on shit" in my opinion (whereas useless comments probably are ;) )