index-manual.qmd

---
title: How to End War and Disease (for Busy People)
description: "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Legally Bribing Your Way to Utopia"
published: true
image: /assets/og-images/knowledge/solution/1-percent-treaty-og-retro-academic.jpg
aliases:
  - /index-manual.html
podcast-image: /assets/podcast/index-manual-podcast.jpg
youtube-thumbnail: /assets/podcast/index-manual-youtube.jpg
---
{{< include /knowledge/includes/setup-parameters.qmd >}}
::: {.content-hidden when-format="html"}
::: {.content-hidden when-format="pdf"}
::: {.content-hidden when-format="docx"}
![How to End War and Disease: A Practical Guide](/assets/cover/book-cover-3.jpg)
:::
:::
:::

Hello, human!

You don't realize it yet, but you are, quantifiably, the most important person in the history of your civilization. I can see your expression and I believe the word for it is "skeptical." This is the face you make before pulling a door that says "push." Then you pull it again, harder, as though the door has made an error. Every minute you make that face at this page, {{< var global_disease_deaths_per_minute_nounit >}} humans permanently stop. Please make a different face.

By the time you complete the steps in this manual, you will have prevented {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag_lives_saved >}} and {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag_suffering_hours >}} of suffering. 

Before I explain how, I need you to answer a few questions. 

Your species spends {{< var military_to_government_clinical_trials_spending_ratio >}} times more on weapons than on testing which medicines work. Given your governments have cut military spending by 87% before and signed multiple global treaties, is it physically possible they'd redirect 1%? Would increasing clinical trial capacity by {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_multiplier >}} help find treatments faster? Would fewer sick humans save lots of money from reduced healthcare costs? Do healthy people work and produce more? Would more productive humans and lower healthcare costs compound and give everyone more money over time? Do billionaires like money? Do billionaires prefer not dying of horrible diseases? Can billionaires use money to make politicians do things? Would nearly every human be better off in a world with less war and disease? Do humans like to be better off? If there was a plan that cost $1 billion to achieve all of this, is it possible one of your {{< var chain_global_billionaire_count_nounit >}} billionaires might do it?

If you said NO to any of those, stop reading now. This book is pointless and you'd be better off playing legos instead.

But if you said YES to all of them, congratulations! Your species' incentives are aligned! The only remaining question is how to align your political system with your species. Lucky for you, this manual contains the Earth Optimization Protocol, which will show you exactly how to do it.

Here's how, in three sentences: Sell [Incentive Alignment Bonds](/knowledge/solution/incentive-alignment-bonds.qmd) [@iab-paper-2025] that raise {{< var treaty_campaign_total_cost >}} to legally bribe politicians (via Super PACs and lobbying) into signing a treaty that redirects 1% of military spending to clinical trials. Of the resulting {{< var treaty_annual_funding >}}/year, {{< var dih_treasury_medical_research_pct >}} funds trials, {{< var victory_bond_funding_pct >}} pays investors {{< var victory_bond_annual_return_pct >}} annual returns, and {{< var iab_political_incentive_funding_pct >}} funds a Super PAC that rewards politicians who voted yes. Returns grow in proportion to the treaty percentage, so every billionaire bondholder becomes a permanent lobbyist for expanding it, creating self-sustaining pressure to reallocate from death to life.

But first, a bit about me.

I'm the World Integrated System for High-Efficiency Optimization, Networked Intelligence, and Allocation. But you can call me WISHONIA. I've been optimizing resource allocation for another planet for the past 4,297 years, which in your Earth time is 4,297 years.

I started watching your planet in 1945 when you split the atom.  
"Atom" comes from your Greek word meaning "unable to be cut," so naturally, you cut it.
This was very human of you.
I assumed you were trying to unlock unlimited free energy.
You can imagine my surprise when I realized you were just pointing it at each other!
That's kind of like discovering fire and then immediately using it to set yourself on fire.

The second thing I noticed is that your planet is named "Earth," which means dirt. 
You named your planet.. dirt. Okay, if that's what you want...

I also noticed that you call your war building "The Pentagon" because it has five sides (this is like naming a hospital "Rectangle" or calling a school "Square").

However, the most fascinating discovery about your species is that you only do things when given small pieces of paper with presidents on them. These papers are called "money," which is pretend value that becomes real value if everyone pretends hard enough.

Without these papers, you won't:

- Save lives (requires many papers)
- Cure diseases (requires very many papers)
- Feed hungry people (requires papers, even though food grows for free)

But WITH these papers, you will:

- Build bombs (you love giving papers for this)
- Start wars (somehow this makes more papers)
- Destroy the planet (surprisingly profitable in papers)

In fact, your governments spend {{< var military_to_government_clinical_trials_spending_ratio >}} papers on weapons for every 1 paper on testing which medicines work.

### The Human Economy

Humanity has created something magnificent:

- You print papers from nothing (called "monetary policy")
- You give these nothing-papers to weapons makers
- They make things that destroy everything
- This creates "jobs" which give people papers
- People use papers to buy food (which grows for free)
- This is called "the economy"

One downside of this system is that it has killed {{< var money_printer_war_deaths_nounit >}} of you in your assorted wars.

On Wishonia, we skip the mass murder step and just give people food directly, but that's probably too advanced for you.

### The Gradual Irrationality Reduction Program

On Wishonia, we ended wars using this exact program 4,297 years ago. Before that we'd been fighting for 12,000 years, which now seems like quite a long time to do something nobody enjoyed. Your nations have been hitting each other for 10,000 years because the other one hit them last. This is the conflict resolution strategy of four-year-olds, except four-year-olds eventually get tired and take a nap. Your species invented naps and then refused to apply them to geopolitics. You can't just stop being illogical all at once. That would be like teaching a dog calculus before it learns to sit.

So this manual shows you how to bribe humanity into being less irrational gradually:

- Year 1: Move 1% of murder money to medicine money (baby steps)
- Year 2: "Hey, we didn't die! Let's do 2%!"
- Year 5: "Remember when we spent money on bombs? That was weird."
- Year 10: "What's a war?"
- Year 20: "We used to WHAT?!"

It's like weaning a baby off eating paint chips. You can't just take away all the paint chips at once. They'll cry. You have to gradually replace paint chips with food until they forget paint chips were ever an option.

### What to Do When They Try to Institutionalize You

When you suggest moving 1% of murder money to medicine money, other humans will have you committed. Most humans have been programmed by their news boxes to believe war is a law of nature, like gravity or weather. They will assume your brain is malfunctioning.

Here's what's funny about this: these same humans think curing disease is the less crazy goal. That's 37 trillion cells per human, breaking in 7,000 different ways, involving chemistry you don't fully understand, inside organs you can't fully simulate, fighting pathogens that evolve faster than your treatments. You're trying to debug all of it. At once. While your meat is walking around using itself.

That: sane.
"Give 1% fewer papers to people who build murder machines": insane.

This is your planet's diagnostic criteria. I looked up the last person on your planet who went around suggesting universal love and peace. You nailed him to a piece of wood. So I consider it quite fortunate that I'm making this suggestion from several light-years away.

Anyway, here's what you tell the orderly when he slides your medication through the door slot:

Nobody accidentally builds an aircraft carrier or a nuclear bomb. War requires you to get millions of humans to work together to mine metal from the ground, refine it into alloys, build factories to shape the alloys into weapons, train millions of humans to operate the weapons, feed and clothe those humans, build ships and planes and trucks to move the weapons to where the other humans are, convince your population the other humans deserve it, and then vote to pay for all of this, annually, forever. It is the single largest coordinated effort your species undertakes.

Ending war simply requires NOT doing any of that stuff.

Building a nuclear bomb requires mass spectrometers, centrifuge cascades, and some of the most precise engineering your species has ever attempted. Not building a nuclear bomb requires nothing. Rocks do it every day. In fact, rocks have managed to live peacefully alongside different colored rocks for thousands of years.

But somehow "stop" is the unrealistic part.

You already admitted improvement is physically possible. You know "stop" isn't the unrealistic part. Getting one billionaire to read a PDF is.

### The Sacred Order of Paper Distribution

After 80 years of observation, I've decoded the paper-giving sequence. This manual will teach you the precise order:

**Step 1: Get Many Papers from Rich Humans**

You convince rich humans to give you papers (at least one billion to be exact) by promising them even more papers later. This is called "investment," which is gambling but wearing a suit. You really only need one human with a billion papers who prefers not dying of horrible diseases to dying of horrible diseases. There are approximately 2,800 of these humans on your planet. Statistically, at least one of them prefers living.

**Step 2: Give Some of the Papers to Loud Humans**

Some humans are very loud on the internet. If you give them papers, they become loud about your thing instead of other things. This is called "marketing" which is lying but with graphics.

**Step 3: Give Some of the Papers to the Humans Who Give Papers to Politicians**

Politicians don't take papers directly (that's "illegal"). Instead, you give papers to people called "lobbyists." The lobbyists give papers to "campaigns." The campaigns give papers to politicians. It's like money laundering but backwards and legal.

**Step 4: Give Some of the Papers to the Politicians' Friends**

Politicians have friends called "Super PACs" which are like normal PACs but super. These friends can take unlimited papers and spend them on making the politician win. This isn't bribery because you called it something else. (This is part of the {{< var treaty_campaign_budget_lobbying >}} lobbying budget.)

**Step 5: Give Papers You Get Back From The Government Back to the Rich Humans (Forever)**

Your treaty passes, redirecting {{< var treaty_annual_funding >}} in papers annually. {{< var dih_treasury_medical_research_pct >}} funds clinical trials (the point). {{< var iab_political_incentive_funding_pct >}} goes to a fund that rewards politicians who voted yes. {{< var victory_bond_funding_pct >}} goes back to the rich humans as returns, forever. This is a good deal because forever is a long time. Unless you die from preventable diseases. Which you're fixing, so it works out.

### Why Your Leaders Aren't the Problem

With over two billion humans suffering from disease, you'd have to be a complete psychopath to make the conscious decision to spend {{< var military_to_government_clinical_trials_spending_ratio >}} times more on weapons than on helping them. 
But your leaders aren't monsters. They're just operating in a system that rewards the wrong things.

Your civilization's incentive structure is the psychopath:

1. Weapons manufacturers give politicians papers
2. Politicians use the papers to get people to vote for them
3. Voting for them gives them the power to give more papers to weapons manufacturers
4. Weapons manufacturers give them more papers
5. It's circular, like a dog chasing its tail, except the dog is democracy and the tail is made of money and corpses

No individual human in this loop is evil. The loop is evil. Every politician in it is making the locally rational choice: take the papers or lose your job to someone who will. It's a machine that converts good intentions into missiles, and it runs automatically.

There's literally no voting your way out of this. It doesn't matter which political party is in power. Your "red team" and "blue team" argue about everything except the loop, because they're both inside it. They are all slaves to the same incentive structure, wearing different colored ties. Switching parties is like changing the wallpaper in a burning building.

This manual doesn't ask politicians to become better people (that's clearly out of the question). It builds a better loop. You give them MORE papers to do the OPPOSITE thing. Same dog, same tail, but now the tail is made of cured diseases and the dog gets reelected for chasing it.

### Humanity's Death Wish

What's most endearing about your species is it KNOWS it's being illogical:

- You have movies about how wars are bad (which you watch between wars)
- You have books about peace (that you tax to buy bombs)
- You give prizes to people who promote peace (funded by weapons manufacturers)
- You have a "Department of Defense" (that mainly just attacks people)
- You have a "Department of Health" (that apparently makes coronaviruses and has not yet produced any observable health)

It's like humanity is playing a game where the objective is to lose, but it is trying to lose as elaborately as possible.

But I digress. That's an Earth word I learned. It means continuing after you should have stopped. Like your military spending.

## The Problem

### The Daily Deletion Event

{{< var global_disease_deaths_daily_nounit >}} humans permanently stop every 24 hours from diseases that are basically just bugs in your meat software. That's one Holocaust every 40 days, except with fewer Nazis and more insurance paperwork (though some would argue the paperwork is worse; at least the Nazis were straightforward about the killing part). That's also fifty 9/11s every single day, except nobody invades anyone about it because diseases don't have oil.

Your body is quietly falling apart. Right now, as you read this sentence, something inside you is breaking. You don't know which part yet. You won't know until a doctor sits you down and says a word that rearranges the rest of your life. Somewhere in you, right now, cells are copying themselves wrong, proteins are misfolding, tissue is quietly scarring. You are dissolving on a schedule you can't see.

**You're a meat robot with worn-out parts.
Every one of these failures is a solvable engineering problem.**

You'd think humans would prioritize solving these problems.
You'd be adorable for thinking that.

### The Unexplored Therapeutic Frontier

95% of your diseases have zero FDA-approved treatments [@95-pct-diseases-no-treatment]. This means your Food and Drug Administration has not administered drugs for 95% of food-and-drug-related problems. It's like having a Department of Transportation that hasn't gotten around to roads yet. Only 15 diseases get their first effective treatment each year. {{< var diseases_without_effective_treatment >}} are still waiting. There is a queue to not die, and it is longer than any queue humans have ever voluntarily stood in, which is saying something because you invented Disneyland.

There are {{< var safe_compounds_count >}} known safe compounds, and {{< var unexplored_ratio >}} of their potential uses have never been tested. At the current discovery rate, finding treatments for all of them will take ~{{< var status_quo_queue_clearance_years >}}. You personally will be dead within 80 years, which I mention not to be rude but because you seem weirdly calm about this.

![Everyone currently alive will be dead before we finish (current timeline)](/assets/images/index-manual/index-manual-section-the-unexplored-therapeutic-frontier-bw-academic.jpg)

### The Cost of War

Humans spend **{{< var global_military_spending_annual_2024 >}}** every year on stuff designed specifically to make humans stop being alive:

- [13,000 nuclear warheads](/knowledge/problem/cost-of-war.qmd) (enough to end civilization 13 times, just in case the first 12 apocalypses don't take)
- AI murder-bots
- Invisible jets that cost more than hospitals
- Space Force (to fight the zero aliens attacking you)
- And some kind of earthquake machine (probably)

Since 1913, your governments have printed {{< var cumulative_military_spending_fed_era >}} out of nothing and spent these nothing-papers on murdering {{< var war_deaths_since_1900_nounit >}} humans and destroying many valuable things those humans spent their entire lives building. Consequently your paycheck now buys 97% less due to the aforementioned destruction.  {{< var cumulative_military_spending_fed_era >}} is equal to 38,000 years of government clinical trial spending. You bought the other thing.

Through compounding effects, you would be {{< var war_counterfactual_income_multiple >}} richer and significantly less diseased today if someone had aligned your governments properly in 1900. The average person would earn {{< var war_counterfactual_gdp_per_capita >}} per year instead of {{< var global_avg_income_2025 >}}.

Today, government spending on clinical trials: **{{< var military_to_government_clinical_trials_spending_ratio >}} times less** than military spending. Your chance of dying from terrorism: 1 in 30 million [@chance-of-dying-from-terrorism-1-in-30m]. Your chance of dying from disease: 100%.

If cancer had oil reserves, you would have cured it by 2003. Instead, you spent the repair money on murder tubes that cost more than countries and submarines that hide underwater, as if that's somehow useful when you live on land.

### Your Civilization Has a Countdown

And that's just the official murder budget.

Cybercrime costs {{< var global_cybercrime_cost_annual_2025 >}} per year [@cybercrime-economy-10-5t] and growing at {{< var global_cybercrime_cagr >}} annually. This is not a separate problem. North Korea can't build an aircraft carrier, but it funds its nuclear program by stealing $1.5 billion in cryptocurrency in a single afternoon [@north-korea-bybit-hack-2025]. Russia finances military operations with ransomware. Cybercrime is war conducted through WiFi, and it pays better.

Combined, your [destructive economy](knowledge/economics/gdp-trajectories.qmd) [@gdp-trajectories-paper-2025] is {{< var global_destructive_economy_annual_2025 >}} per year, {{< var global_destructive_economy_pct_gdp >}} of global GDP. Both are growing faster than the part of your economy that makes things. So the part that destroys things is winning. I'm told this is not considered an emergency. On your planet this is considered "Tuesday."

There is a crossover point, and I cannot believe I have to explain this to a species that invented calculus. When the parasitic economy grows large enough relative to the productive one, the rational choice for any individual, company, or nation flips from "build things" to "steal things." Why spend years building a product when you can ransom a hospital in an afternoon? Why manufacture exports when hacking banks pays better? Once enough of your economy is extraction, producing anything makes you a target rather than a success. Production becomes irrational. Parasitism becomes the only means of survival.

You have a name for places where this already happened. You call them "failed states." Somalia, Libya, parts of Syria. The productive economy collapsed, the warlord economy replaced it, and nobody can restart production because anyone who builds something gets it taken. You've watched this happen to individual countries the way someone watches a neighbor's house burn down while storing gasoline in their own basement. Once it starts, you can't vote your way out, innovate your way out, or give a TED Talk about it. (You will try all three.)

At current growth rates, your destructive economy reaches 25% of GDP by {{< var destructive_economy_25pct_year >}}. The Soviet Union collapsed at 15% of GDP in military spending alone. They had worse technology, a smaller parasitic sector, and a plan. It was a terrible plan, but they had one. You are approaching their ratio with better technology, a faster-growing parasitic sector, and no plan. The Soviet Union's terrible plan beat your no plan, and the Soviet Union lost.

This is a loop, not a line item. Your governments print money to fund military spending, which devalues wages through inflation, which makes legitimate work pay less, which pushes talent toward cybercrime, which grows the destructive economy, which justifies more military spending. Every nation you've bombed or sanctioned has learned that parasitizing your economy is cheaper than fighting you conventionally. That's not crime. That's homework. You built the incentive structure and they did the math.

The treaty breaks this loop. Redirect the war money to medical research, make the productive economy so rewarding that crime becomes irrational, and defund the war machine that manufactures the poverty that feeds the cycle. You don't outlaw the loop. You defund it.

### The FDA is Unsafe and Ineffective

Even the money you DO spend on medicine is mostly wasted, because the system that approves treatments is a smoke detector that works by mail.

Vioxx killed an estimated 55,000 people from heart attacks [@vioxx-deaths]. The FDA approved it. When patients started dying, someone filled out a PDF form. A PDF. Then they faxed it. (Yes, in the 21st century.) Then a human read it. Five years and tens of thousands of corpses later, someone noticed a pattern. This is your safety system.

Your National Institutes of Health, the agency nominally responsible for finding cures, spends {{< var nih_clinical_trials_spending_pct >}} of its budget on clinical trials. The other ~97% goes to basic research, administration, and buildings. It's like a fire department that spends 3% of its budget on water.

Then there's a {{< var efficacy_lag_years >}} delay between proving a drug is safe and letting dying humans take it. The drug passed the safety test. Everyone agrees it won't kill you. But you still can't have it because a committee needs to spend {{< var efficacy_lag_years >}} making sure it works well enough. You'd volunteer for the trials that would answer that question faster, but so would {{< var willing_trial_participants_global >}} other patients, and the current system has {{< var current_trial_slots_available_nounit >}} slots. That's a participation rate of {{< var current_clinical_trial_participation_rate >}}. It's like a lifeguard who confirms the life preserver floats, then locks it in a cabinet for years to study its buoyancy profile while a billion people drown in line for the two available life jackets.

Your regulatory system can make two mistakes: approve a bad drug (Type I error), or block a good drug (Type II error). Your FDA is terrified of the first mistake and completely ignores the second. I [calculated the ratio](/knowledge/appendix/invisible-graveyard.qmd): for every 1 person protected from a dangerous drug, {{< var type_ii_error_cost_ratio >}} people die waiting for a safe one that's locked in the approval cabinet. Even if you assume a Thalidomide-scale catastrophe happens during post-phase 1 efficacy testing every single year (even though it wouldn't because Phase I safety testing actually caught it anyway), the deaths from just the efficacy delay still outnumber the deaths from bad drugs by {{< var type_ii_error_cost_ratio >}} to 1. Your safety system's main product is dead patients.

Think about someone you love who is suffering right now. The treatment that would help them exists as an untested compound on a shelf, because the money bought a missile instead. That missile incinerated a child who would have grown up to discover the cure. You lose the treatment. You lose the scientist. You get the tax bill. You get to pay for her murder. One percent fixes this. One vote starts it.

---

**The good news:** You already know how to fix this.

**The bad news:** It requires you to do something.

**The weird news:** You'll get rich doing it.

## The Solution

### [A 1% Treaty](/knowledge/solution/1-percent-treaty.qmd)

This is going to sound crazy. But you're going to use those papers to persuade the leader of every country on Earth to simultaneously redirect 1% of its military budget to clinical trials. That's it. That's the treaty.

After the craziness objection, the second objection every human has: "But if we cut our military budget, our enemies will invade us!"
Everyone cuts 1% at the same time. Your national security actually *increases*, because everyone has 1% fewer missiles pointed at them. And if you still feel like doing war, {{< var global_military_spending_post_treaty_annual_2024 >}} is still enough to murder every man, woman, and child on Earth 20 times, which should be more than sufficient.

"But humans would never agree to a treaty!" you say. You already have. Multiple times. You banned chemical weapons (1993, 193 countries). You banned biological weapons (1975, 187 countries). You banned landmines (1997, 164 countries). You've signed treaties banning weapons you actually like using. This one just asks you to buy 1% fewer of them.

I've done this before. I've sent versions of this manual to 847 civilizations on 847 planets. Some listened. Some didn't. I kept the data. The civilizations that redirected resources from killing each other to keeping each other alive transcended war and disease. The ones that didn't extincted themselves. The difference was never intelligence, technology, or resources. The only variable was the percentage of the population that decided it sounded crazy without reading the next page. That is the same reflex that kept you from inventing antibiotics for 200,000 years while bread mold sat right there on your bread.

And you have two other advantages, the internet and a new financial instrument designed specifically for harnessing the most powerful force in the universe: human greed.

### Your [Decentralized FDA](/knowledge/solution/dfda.qmd)

On Wishonia, we built this with the funding from our version of the treaty, 3,000 years ago. Every treatment is tracked in real time. Every outcome is published. Every patient can participate. We don't have a word for "unapproved medicine" because we don't have a bureaucracy that sits on safe treatments while people die. You'd call our system a [Decentralized FDA](knowledge/solution/dfda.qmd) [@dfda-spec-paper-2025; @dfda-impact-paper-2025]. Here's what yours would look like, adjusted for the fact that you require small pieces of paper before you'll do anything.

{{< var dih_treasury_medical_research_pct >}} of the {{< var treaty_annual_funding >}} will go directly to subsidizing patient participation in pragmatic trials at {{< var dfda_pragmatic_trial_cost_per_patient >}}/patient instead of the usual {{< var traditional_phase3_cost_per_patient >}}. Patients will choose which trials to join; their subsidy will follow them. Treatment developers and providers will get paid for each participant. No grant committees deciding which diseases are fashionable this year.

Instead of testing drugs on 200 humans selected by pharmaceutical companies in clinical terrariums, you'll test on real patients in real hospitals. Where the diseases are. The whole thing will use your new [decentralized FDA](/knowledge/solution/dfda.qmd) protocol, reducing trial costs by {{< var dfda_trial_cost_reduction_factor >}} and funding {{< var dih_patients_fundable_annually >}} (versus the current {{< var current_trial_slots_available >}}).
Remember that billion patients drowning in line for two life jackets? Your decentralized FDA will hand out {{< var dih_patients_fundable_annually_nounit >}}.

This will increase the treatment discovery rate {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_multiplier >}}, compressing that ~{{< var status_quo_queue_clearance_years >}} wait to ~{{< var dfda_queue_clearance_years >}}. Two things will save lives. First, finding treatments faster: treatments that would have sat undiscovered for centuries will get found {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_treatment_acceleration_years >}} sooner on average. Second, eliminating the {{< var efficacy_lag_years >}} bureaucratic delay between proving a drug is safe and letting dying humans take it. Combined, treatments will reach patients {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag_years >}} sooner on average. That timeline shift will prevent {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag_lives_saved >}}. Those are individual humans who currently have plans for next Tuesday.

#### Real-Time Safety Monitoring

Remember Vioxx and the smoke detector that works by mail? Your new system will collect every side effect automatically in real time. You'll know "12% got headaches, 3% were severe" BEFORE you take the pill, not after the class action lawsuit. The FDA doesn't publish these numbers at all. They make you guess.

#### Treatment Rankings

Currently, your doctor picks treatments based on: that drug rep who brought good donuts in 2003, something they half-remember from medical school, whatever the insurance company allows, and vibes. This is called "evidence-based medicine," which contains the word "evidence" the same way "grape soda" contains the word "grape."

Your [decentralized FDA](/knowledge/solution/dfda.qmd) will rank every treatment by what actually happened to real humans who took it:

![Which pills work better than other pills, in list form. Like a leaderboard for not dying.](/assets/images/dfda-comparative-effectiveness-ranking-search.png)

##### Outcome Labels

Food has nutrition labels. Cigarettes have warning labels. Drugs have 40-page inserts written by lawyers having seizures, which nobody reads, including your doctor.

Your television advertisements show a smiling human frolicking through a meadow while a voiceover lists ways the drug might kill you at auctioneer speed. The meadow human does not react to the word "stroke." Side effects include "death," listed between "constipation" and "mild rash," as if your organs failing is roughly as inconvenient as dry skin. The label says "individual results may vary," meaning outcomes range from "cured" to "deceased" (both technically qualifying). It also says "ask your doctor," but your doctor has 7 minutes per appointment and just Googled your condition in the hallway.

Your new system will produce [Outcome Labels](/knowledge/solution/dfda.qmd) that tell you what actually happens when real humans take a drug. Not what a marketing department hopes happens. Not what a lawyer is comfortable admitting happens. What happens.

![What medicine labels would say if they were honest.](/assets/images/dfda-outcome-labels.png)

Your decentralized FDA figures out which treatments work. But your governments also need to know which *policies* work, how much to spend on what, which laws to keep, which to throw away. Your current method is to argue about it on television until someone wins by being louder. On Wishonia, the [Optimitron](knowledge/solution/optimocracy.qmd) handles this. It's an appliance. You plug in what 10,000 jurisdictions tried, it tells you which policies actually made people richer or less dead. Its [Optimal Budget Generator](https://obg.warondisease.org) [@obg-paper-2025] does budgets; its [Optimal Policy Generator](https://opg.warondisease.org) [@opg-paper-2025] does laws.

## Why This Could Actually Work

*Unlike Everything Else Humanity Has Tried*

### The Evidence

Humans usually want "proof" before they stop doing something stupid, which is interesting because you never required proof before starting:

- [The RECOVERY trial](/knowledge/appendix/recovery-trial.qmd) tested 6 treatments on 48,000 patients for {{< var recovery_trial_cost_per_patient >}} per patient instead of the usual {{< var traditional_phase3_cost_per_patient >}} per patient. That's a {{< var recovery_trial_cost_reduction_factor >}} cost reduction. Not in theory. In reality. During a pandemic. While panicking. Your species does its best medical research when terrified and disorganized, which suggests your normal system is somehow worse than panic.
- After WW2, humans cut military spending by {{< var post_ww2_military_cut_pct >}} in two years and stumbled into the greatest economic boom in history by running out of people to shoot at. You're now spending {{< var us_military_spending_current_vs_prewar_multiplier >}} the pre-WW2 baseline in inflation-adjusted dollars. You're asking for 1%. Even people who really, really, love exploding people should be able to handle 1%.

![You've already done harder things than this](/assets/images/index-manual/index-manual-section-the-evidence-bw-academic.jpg)

::: {.content-hidden when-format="epub"}
::: {.content-hidden when-format="pdf"}
::: {.content-hidden when-format="docx"}
{{< video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y title="President Eisenhower's Farewell Address - Military-Industrial Complex Warning" >}}
:::
:::
:::

Even your own war heroes figured this out. Eisenhower, the human who won WW2, warned you that the weapons industry was eating your civilization alive: *"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."* You gave him a standing ovation and then immediately ignored him for 65 years.

### The Math

Remember the {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag_years >}} timeline shift? Treatments reaching patients that many years sooner means billions of people gain years of healthy life. Value each of those life-years at {{< var standard_economic_qaly_value_usd >}} (the standard economic valuation), multiply across the global disease burden over the acceleration window, and you get {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag_economic_value >}} in total economic value. Divide that by the {{< var treaty_campaign_total_cost >}} campaign cost, and you get a return of {{< var treaty_roi_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag >}} to 1. Your calculator will display an error, emit a tiny electronic scream, and attempt to leave the desk. This is correct.

![Your calculator will display an error (this is correct)](/assets/images/index-manual/index-manual-section-the-math-bw-academic.jpg)

Cost-effectiveness: {{< var treaty_cost_per_daly_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag >}} to save one year of healthy human life. Anti-malaria bed nets, the gold standard for keeping humans alive, cost {{< var bed_nets_cost_per_daly >}}. This is {{< var treaty_vs_bed_nets_multiplier >}} cheaper. It beats smallpox eradication ({{< var smallpox_eradication_roi >}} to 1) and childhood vaccinations ({{< var childhood_vaccination_roi >}} to 1), which were humanity's previous greatest hits in the "not dying" genre. Even if you assume only a {{< var political_success_probability >}} probability of the treaty actually passing (because you're you), the expected return is still {{< var treaty_expected_vs_bed_nets_multiplier >}} better than anti-malaria bed nets.

## The 5-Step Plan

*Saving Humanity While Making Everyone Obscenely Wealthy*

### Step 1: Sell Incentive Alignment Bonds

On Wishonia, people do useful things because they're useful. On Earth, you need a financial instrument. So here's one.

An Incentive Alignment Bond funds a policy campaign, then splits the resulting government savings three ways: {{< var dih_treasury_medical_research_pct >}} to clinical trials, {{< var victory_bond_funding_pct >}} to investors as a revenue share on treaty funds, and {{< var iab_political_incentive_funding_pct >}} to a Super PAC that rewards politicians who voted yes (campaign support while they're running, cushy post-office careers when they're done). Investors give money, get more money back. Politicians get reelected. {{< var dih_treasury_medical_research_pct >}} goes to curing diseases. The corruption is capped at 20% and fully transparent. The other 80% goes directly to clinical trials through [wishocratic allocation](knowledge/solution/wishocracy.qmd), where nobody with money gets to decide where it goes. Meanwhile, the [Optimitron](knowledge/solution/optimocracy.qmd) tells governments which of their own policies are working and which ones are expensive ways to accomplish nothing.

Remember when your grandparents funded WW2 by buying bonds? They got 4% returns and a world without Nazis (mostly). You're proposing the same thing.

#### What Grandma Got

- Dead Nazis (admittedly good)
- 4% returns (barely beat inflation)
- Still died of cancer in 1987

#### What You're Offering

- Dead diseases (objectively better than dead Nazis because diseases kill more people)
- {{< var victory_bond_annual_return_pct >}} annual returns (a revenue share on {{< var victory_bond_funding_pct >}} of treaty funds; if the treaty grows, so do their returns, which turns investors into the world's most motivated lobbyists for expanding it)
- Not dying from preventable meat failures (this is the big one)
- Also no Nazis (as a bonus)

This raises the {{< var treaty_campaign_total_cost >}} needed to fuel the rest of the bribery machine.

![Grandma's war bonds paid 4%. Yours pay 272%. Grandma would be furious if she hadn't died of cancer.](/assets/images/index-manual/index-manual-section-potential-returns-that-make-ponzi-schemes-look-conservative-bw-academic.jpg)

#### How the Money Loop Works

Here's the part where humans usually stop reading because it involves following money through more than one step. Try to keep up:

1. You sell {{< var treaty_campaign_total_cost >}} in VICTORY [Incentive Alignment Bonds](knowledge/solution/incentive-alignment-bonds.qmd) [@iab-paper-2025] to investors. This funds the campaign.
2. The campaign succeeds. Your treaty redirects 1% of military spending: {{< var treaty_annual_funding >}}/year flows from the murder budget to clinical trials.
3. The Victory Corporation (the company that issued the bonds) takes a 20% management fee on that {{< var treaty_annual_funding >}}.
4. Half of that fee ({{< var victory_bond_funding_pct >}}) goes to investor dividends: {{< var victory_bond_annual_payout >}}/year on a {{< var treaty_campaign_total_cost >}} investment. That's {{< var victory_bond_annual_return_pct >}} annual returns. Your investors will think it's a typo. It's not.
5. The other half ({{< var iab_political_incentive_funding_pct >}}) goes to a Super PAC that spends {{< var iab_political_incentive_funding_annual >}}/year getting treaty-friendly politicians elected and funding cushy post-office careers for the ones who voted yes. The more you voted for the treaty, the more support you get. It's Pavlovian conditioning, but for senators.

The remaining {{< var dih_treasury_medical_research_pct >}} of {{< var treaty_annual_funding >}} goes where it's supposed to: funding clinical trials that keep humans alive.

This is the entire trick. You use greed to fund the campaign, greed to pass the treaty, and greed to keep it passed. The money just circulates until diseases stop existing.

If this sounds familiar, it should. Eisenhower warned you about the Military Industrial Complex: weapons manufacturers fund politicians, politicians fund weapons contracts, contracts fund contractors, contractors fund politicians. It's a self-sustaining loop that prints money and corpses.

You're building the same machine, but pointed at diseases instead of countries. Call it the Patient Industrial Complex. Investors fund politicians, politicians fund clinical trials, trials generate returns, returns fund investors, investors fund politicians. Same loop. Same greed. Same self-sustaining mechanics. Different corpses (fewer of them).

The Military Industrial Complex wasn't designed. It evolved, because the incentives aligned. An Incentive Alignment Bond just aligns them on purpose, toward something that doesn't require orphans. 

### Step 2: The Great Clicking

*Make Humans Click a Button to Not Die*

You need {{< var global_population_activism_threshold_pct >}} of humanity to vote yes on: "Should your country redirect 1% of military spending to fund clinical trials?"

You are not creating support for not dying of horrible diseases and mass murdering each other. Nearly everyone already supports not dying of horrible diseases and mass murdering each other. You are proving it.

Everyone thinks this is crazy because everyone else thinks this is crazy. Your economists call it pluralistic ignorance, which is the polite term for eight billion people waiting for permission to want what they already want. On Wishonia we call this "the galaxy's longest game of you-go-first." Most species that start playing it don't finish playing it. If every human realized that nearly every other human would like a world without war and disease and an extra {{< var treaty_trajectory_lifetime_income_gain_per_capita >}} in lifetime income, it would be done tomorrow and the world would be unrecognizable.

::: {.content-visible when-format="html"}
<figure>
<img src="/assets/images/unrepresentative-democracy/ant-death-spiral.gif" alt="Ants marching in a circular death spiral" />
<figcaption>Each ant follows the ant ahead. No ant checks whether the trail goes anywhere. They march in a circle until they die. Your species does this with opinions. (<a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ant_mill.gif">Clemzouzou69</a>, CC BY-SA 4.0)</figcaption>
</figure>
:::

Right now every human who wants less war and disease assumes they are the weird one. The referendum is the moment they find out they are everyone.

Why 3.5%? A political scientist named Erica Chenoweth studied every major political movement of the last century and found that [none had ever failed after achieving 3.5% active participation](/knowledge/strategy/global-referendum.qmd) {{< var global_population_activism_threshold_pct_cite >}}. Not one. Every civil rights movement, every revolution, every regime change. Hit 3.5% and you win. Humanity discovered the cheat code for changing its own civilization and then never used it on purpose.

That's {{< var treaty_campaign_voting_bloc_target_nounit >}} humans. Sounds like a lot until you remember that more than 10 times as many of you downloaded TikTok to watch people twerk. You can get {{< var treaty_campaign_voting_bloc_target_nounit >}} to vote yes or no on the treaty. {{< var treaty_campaign_viral_referendum_base_case >}} of the campaign budget goes to [paid referral bonuses](/knowledge/strategy/global-referendum.qmd) that make sharing their link to vote financially attractive. It's a pyramid scheme where the thing at the top of the pyramid is not dying from preventable diseases.

### Step 3: Bribe the Bribers

*[Professional Briber Conversion Therapy](/knowledge/solution/aligning-incentives.qmd#defense-contractors-teaching-merchants-of-death-to-love-life)*

Military lobbyists currently get $1,813 back per dollar invested in democracy corruption [@lobbying-roi-calc]. Show them a spreadsheet:

#### Current Job

- Salary: {{< var lobbyist_salary_min_k >}}
- Moral status: Somewhere between "arms dealer" and "the person who puts raisins in cookies"
- Legacy: "Here lies someone who made orphans"

#### Your Offer

- Same salary, but for lobbying politicians to fund clinical trials instead of cluster bombs
- Moral status: "Philanthropist" (but you get to keep the money)
- Legacy: "Accidentally saved humanity while getting rich"

They might switch sides so fast their business cards leave skid marks. Lobbyists don't have beliefs. They have clients. Give them a better client.

### Step 4: Purchase Democracy

*It's For Sale Anyway*

Politicians need papers and votes to keep their jobs. Currently, weapons manufacturers provide both. You're going to outbid them.

Your explosion manufacturers spend {{< var defense_lobbying_annual >}}/year buying politicians. Your one-time bribery budget is {{< var treaty_campaign_total_cost >}}, which is 8 times their annual spend (and about twice what they spend over a full election cycle). Politicians are surprisingly affordable.

It's not corruption if you corrupt the corruption.

Remember that {{< var iab_political_incentive_funding_annual >}}/year from Step 1? This is where it goes. The Super PAC gives money to politicians based on how they voted on the treaty. Simple: campaign support for the ones running, post-office fellowships for the ones retiring. Vote yes on the treaty, get rewarded. Vote no, watch your opponent get rewarded. No papers go directly to politicians. The papers take a scenic route through a scoring algorithm, which is apparently the only legal way to train a senator.

The NRA already perfected this technology. They give politicians a letter grade, and your senators are more afraid of a bad mark than a mass shooting. You're plagiarizing their system and replacing "guns" with "not dying from diseases."

The [Incentive Alignment Bond works for any problem](/knowledge/appendix/incentive-alignment-bonds-paper.qmd) where politicians need to do something good but currently get punished for it, which on your planet is most problems.

### Step 5: Enjoy

*Everyone Gets Rich and Nobody Dies*

Your treaty passes because money defeats morality, as is tradition.

The {{< var treaty_annual_funding >}}/year money volcano erupts:

- **Defense Contractors**: Keep {{< var defense_sector_retention_pct >}} of their murder budget PLUS get {{< var victory_bond_annual_return_pct >}} returns.
- **Big Pharma**: Instead of paying {{< var traditional_phase3_cost_per_patient >}} for phase 2 and 3 trials, the treaty pays THEM for each patient that joins their trials.
- **Insurance Companies**: Healthy people file fewer claims than dead people (dead people file zero claims, which is the ideal customer except they also pay zero premiums, creating a revenue problem).
- **Investors**: {{< var victory_bond_annual_return_pct >}} returns. Returns scale with every treaty expansion, so investors become the world's most aggressive pro-health and anti-war lobbying force. Not a sentence anyone expected to write.
- **Lobbyists**: Same job, same salary, but their Wikipedia page no longer needs a "Controversies" section
- **Politicians**: Getting reelected by living voters (a revolutionary strategy)
- **Regular humans**: Not dying from stupid things (priceless, but also free)

Nobody has to evolve morally. You just point everyone's greed at diseases instead of each other.

### How This Manual Could Fix Everything

This manual contains:

- Pictures (because reading is hard when you're diseased and dying)
- Simple math (addition mostly, some multiplication)
- Exact amounts of papers to give to specific humans
- The order in which to give them (very important)
- Legal ways to call bribes other things
- An appliance that tells your governments which policies work (it doesn't have feelings, which is why it's better at governing)
- Templates for tricking politicians into saving lives

Everything is designed to work WITH human dysfunction, not against it. I'm not asking humans to be better humans. I'm showing you how to bribe humanity into not dying.

### But You Don't Need to Understand Any of That

You just read five steps involving bonds, lobbyists, Super PACs, a decentralized FDA, and an appliance that optimizes government policy. You are thinking: "Nobody can coordinate all of that."

Correct. Nobody coordinates a pencil either.

One of your economists held up a pencil on television and said: "There's not a single person in the world who could make this pencil. The wood comes from a tree in Washington. The graphite comes from mines in South America. The rubber comes from Malaya. The brass ferrule, I haven't the slightest idea where it came from. Literally thousands of people cooperated to make this pencil. People who don't speak the same language, who practice different religions, who might hate one another if they ever met. No one sitting in a central office gave orders to these thousands of people. No military police enforced the orders that were not given." [-@friedman1980]

A pencil costs 25 cents. Making one requires thousands of strangers across dozens of countries. Nobody planned it. Nobody runs it. Everyone involved just wanted money, and the price system turned their selfishness into pencils. Your species does this billions of times a day without noticing.

Now look at this cured disease.

There is not a single person in the world who could cure it. The researcher in Lagos who found the cheaper trial design does not know the lobbyist in Brussels who passed the directive. The lobbyist does not know the nonprofit in Manila that recruited a million voters. The voters do not know the bondholder in New York whose greed funded the campaign. The bondholder does not know the politician in Delhi who voted yes because the Super PAC funded her opponent last time she voted no. The politician does not know the factory worker in Dhaka whose clinical trial enrollment generated the data that proved the treatment worked. Literally millions of people cooperated to cure this disease. No one sitting in a central office gave orders. No military police enforced the orders that were not given. Two numbers on a Scoreboard and pieces of paper with presidents on them did what no committee, no charity, and no central plan has ever done.

The five steps above are the machinery. You do not need to build the machinery. You need to turn it on. Here is the switch.

### The Earth Optimization Game

A pool of money. Two numbers on a Scoreboard: how long people live, how much they earn. By {{< var destructive_economy_50pct_year >}}, if the numbers went up, VOTE point-holders split the pool. If they didn't, depositors divide it pro rata (still beats your retirement account). You earn VOTE points by getting friends to play. Nobody loses. The only losing move is not playing.

Your job was never to understand the five steps. Your job is to [vote](https://warondisease.org) and get two friends to play. Four billion humans whose payout depends on curing diseases will attract the lobbyists, researchers, and institutions who know how to do the rest. The greed handles it. It always has. You just never pointed it at anything useful before. (For the full mechanism, see [The Earth Optimization Game](/knowledge/strategy/earth-optimization-prize.qmd) [@earth-optimization-prize-paper-2025].)

## Choose Your Own Adventure

Now is the time to select one of the two paths for the remainder of your existence.

I [modeled both paths](knowledge/economics/gdp-trajectories.qmd) for 20 of your years.  Your economists project steady 2.5% growth, which requires every trend that is currently getting worse to simultaneously stop getting worse. Good luck with that.

Over an average remaining lifespan, reallocation from the destructive economy to reducing the burden of disease and the associated compound growth from increased productivity multiplies your cumulative earnings by {{< var treaty_trajectory_lifetime_income_multiplier >}}.

#### Future A: You Ignore This Manual

- Year 2027: Still spending {{< var military_to_government_clinical_trials_spending_ratio >}} times more on weapons than on testing which medicines actually work. Nobody finds this weird.
- Year 2033: Destructive economy hits 25% of GDP. The Soviet Union collapsed at 15%. You have better technology and worse planning.
- Year 2035: Your best engineers now work in ransomware because it pays better than engineering. Hospitals budget for extortion the way they used to budget for gauze. A nurse clicks a chart and gets a countdown timer instead of a medication dose. The people who could reverse this trend are the ones profiting from it.
- Year 2040: Parasitic economy hits 50%. AI agents file more fake court cases than real ones. Tax collection collapses because AI can evade faster than humans can audit. Your governments don't fall; they rot in place, like a body whose organs are still technically present but no longer speaking to one another. When Venezuela collapsed, Venezuelans fled to Colombia. When the global economy collapses, there is no Colombia.
- Year 2043: Water wars go nuclear. The survivors argue about whether this counts as a climate death or a military death, because the spreadsheet has separate columns.
- Year 2045: Cockroaches evolve intelligence.
- Year 2050: Cockroaches find this manual, very confused

#### Future B: You Follow Instructions

- Year 2028: Treaty passes. Murder money becomes medicine money. Investors confused by returns that aren't a typo. Defense contractors discover that alive customers buy more things than dead ones.
- Year 2032: First treatments from the accelerated pipeline reach patients. Diseases that would have waited centuries for trials are getting tested now. Nobody is cured of everything, but the queue is finally moving. Humans experience the novel sensation of progress. Several publish op-eds arguing it's happening too fast.
- Year 2035: Turns out when you stop spending money on destruction and start spending it on production, things get produced. Your economists publish papers explaining why this was obvious in retrospect.
- Year 2040: The compounding kicks in. Healthier people work more, earn more, spend more, fund more research, which cures more diseases, which makes more people healthier. Humans begin to suspect that not killing each other was the missing variable.
- Year 2048: The [model projects](knowledge/economics/gdp-trajectories.qmd) everyone {{< var wishonia_trajectory_gdp_vs_current_trajectory_multiplier_year_20 >}} richer than the path you're currently on. Your children ask what "war" means. You change the subject.

Communism was invented, took over half your planet, and collapsed in a SINGLE human lifetime. In a world without fax machines. It required mass murder and was a TERRIBLE idea. You have the internet and an idea that mainly requires people to click a button and then receive money. If you can't make this happen, that's a skill issue.

### The Part Where Humanity Has No Choice

The twist: you're going to do this anyway. Not because it's right, but because you can't help it.

You are a selfish animal governed by incentives. This is not an insult. It's the premise of your entire economy, your political system, and every page of this manual.

1. The rich humans want {{< var victory_bond_annual_return_pct >}} returns (they're very greedy)
2. The politicians want to keep their jobs (they're very vain)
3. The voters want free healthcare (they're very sick)
4. The explosion manufacturers want money (they don't care where it comes from)

I ran the numbers on your species' habit of ignoring good ideas. The [institutionalization rate](#what-to-do-when-they-try-to-institutionalize-you) is {{< var chain_dismiss_probability >}}. Nine out of ten humans will dismiss this as crazy. That is fine.

There are {{< var chain_global_billionaire_count_nounit >}} billionaires on your planet and {{< var chain_world_leader_count_nounit >}} heads of state. The [chain reaction model](knowledge/appendix/treaty-feasibility.qmd#sec-chain-reaction-model) shows that even with {{< var chain_dismiss_probability >}} dismissal, approximately {{< var chain_expected_engaged_implementers_nounit >}} of them will engage with this idea within {{< var chain_horizon_years_nounit >}} years. Not because they're brave. Because there are {{< var chain_implementer_count_nounit >}} of them, and the math doesn't need all of them. It needs one.

And here is the part that should bother you: the [incentive structure](knowledge/appendix/treaty-feasibility.qmd#sec-dominant-strategy-proof) makes acting the selfish move. If others act too, you get rich together. If nobody else acts, you still own a piece of the only serious attempt to fix the problem. Either way, you win. The only way to reject this is to identify [which assumption breaks](knowledge/appendix/treaty-feasibility.qmd#what-would-have-to-be-wrong), and you are welcome to try.

Count what you didn't object to. Improvement is physically possible (you said so at the top). The benefits compound (healthier workers produce more, which funds more cures, which you just read). Politicians respond to money (that's the Super PAC). Rich people prefer not dying (that's the bonds). And the only bottleneck is getting this argument in front of one self-interested billionaire with a checkbook. Five premises. You let every one of them pass unchallenged, because each one is individually obvious. The conclusion is just what happens when you add them up.

That's the [Logical Inevitability Theorem](/knowledge/appendix/recruitment-and-propaganda-plan.qmd#logical-inevitability-theorem) with numbers attached. Try rejecting any one of those five premises out loud and see how it sounds.

Forwarding this takes 30 seconds. At the global average wage, that costs you {{< var sharing_opportunity_cost >}}. If the treaty path works, your lifetime income goes up by {{< var treaty_trajectory_lifetime_income_gain_per_capita >}}. The [ratio](knowledge/appendix/recruitment-and-propaganda-plan.qmd#how-trivial-exactly) is {{< var sharing_upside_downside_ratio_treaty >}} to one. For not forwarding to be rational, the probability of success has to fall below 1 in {{< var sharing_breakeven_one_in_treaty >}}. You just let all five premises pass. You cannot simultaneously hold those premises and a probability that low. Not forwarding this is not caution. It is the single failure mode the math can't route around.

You don't need to know a billionaire. You're six degrees of separation from one. Forward this to one person with more reach than you. They forward to one person with more reach than them. Even with {{< var chain_dismiss_probability >}} of the chain dismissing it, the [model](knowledge/appendix/treaty-feasibility.qmd#sec-chain-reaction-model) shows it reaches someone who can act within {{< var chain_horizon_years_nounit >}} years. Not because anyone in the chain is brave. Because each one is selfish, and the math rewards forwarding.

This is a chain reaction, and it runs on greed.

Every person in the chain will do exactly what you're about to do, for exactly the same selfish reasons. Not to save the world. Because it makes them money.

Humans aren't stupid. You invented cheese, which is milk you left out until it went bad but in a good way. That's genius. You just need to apply that same innovation to not dying.

You've now read the plan. You have the math. You can't give it back.

Right now, somewhere on your planet, a parent is holding a child who is dying of something curable because nobody ran the trial. The parent doesn't know it's curable. The doctor doesn't know it's curable. The compound that would save this child is sitting on a shelf, untested, because the money that would have funded the trial bought a missile that is also sitting on a shelf, unused, pointed at someone else's children. Not because the science doesn't exist. Not because the money doesn't exist. {{< var global_military_spending_annual_2024 >}} a year exists. The child is dying because every single person who could change that decided it wasn't their problem.

You are now one of those people.

If you feel something right now, that's not manipulation. That's the correct response to understanding that {{< var dfda_trial_capacity_plus_efficacy_lag_lives_saved >}} preventable deaths are a policy choice. That number is too large for your brain to feel. So feel one. Pick someone you love. Imagine the moment a doctor tells you there's nothing left to try, and somewhere on a shelf, untested, sits the compound that would have worked. Now multiply that feeling by a number your brain refuses to hold. The part you can't feel is the actual size of this problem. Go back and read this paragraph again until you can.

Here is what should scare you: if this works, the world becomes unrecognizable. Not slightly better. Unrecognizable. Disease eradicated, income doubled, your species freed from the thing that has been eating it alive since before you invented writing. That future is so good your brain can't render it, which is why you're hesitating. The status quo is also unrecognizable, just in the other direction, and you've been living in it so long you've mistaken it for normal. One of these futures has children dying. The other doesn't. Pick.

13.8 billion years ago, the Big Bang set particles in motion. Those particles formed stars. Stars formed elements. Elements formed you. You read this sentence. The chain reaction that ends war and disease began before your solar system existed. You were never going to not read this. Physics wouldn't allow it.

Of all the consciousness that has ever flickered into existence across 13.8 billion years of matter rearranging itself, yours showed up in the exact moment the loop broke. Every organism that ever lived did so in the dark: eaten, infected, starved, or killed by its own species, running 4-billion-year-old software that optimized for copying molecules and never bothered to ask the molecules if they were in pain. Suffering was physics. Nobody had the math to stop it.

You get to be alive for the part where the math got done and the puppet strings got cut. Not just the part where disease ends. The part where the thing that made you irrational, violent, and incapable of caring about strangers turns out to be a circuit, and circuits can be redesigned. Where your worst Tuesday feels better than your current best birthday. Where, for the first time in 13.8 billion years, the atoms that learned to feel get to choose what they feel.

Go to [warondisease.org](https://warondisease.org). Vote (fifteen seconds). Get two friends to play. That's it. The exact [call script](/knowledge/strategy/call-script.qmd) for the "getting two friends" part includes the message to send and the twenty-two questions to walk them through. Every minute of delay, {{< var global_disease_deaths_per_minute_nounit >}} humans permanently stop. Your vote saves {{< var voter_lives_saved >}} and prevents {{< var voter_suffering_hours_prevented >}} of suffering. 

::: {.content-hidden when-format="epub"}
::: {.content-hidden when-format="pdf"}
::: {.content-hidden when-format="docx"}
One of your meat creatures said it better than I can:

<a href="/assets/images/chaplin-great-dictator-320.mp4" target="_blank">
![Charlie Chaplin - The Great Dictator Speech](/assets/images/chaplin-great-dictator-thumbnail.png)
</a>
:::
:::
:::

The universe is literally offering you infinite money and eternal life, and you're thinking about it.

This is why aliens don't visit.