Skip to content

Bad 3DGS reconstruction #20

@andrewsilver1997

Description

@andrewsilver1997

Hi,

Very interesting work. I'm running your work on my self-customized data. I observed that the result of python train_gaussian.py -s <path to COLMAP or NeRF Synthetic dataset> wasn't very good compared to the vanilla 3DGS. And the renderings look like a group of spheres. Is it normal and are there any changes in your code?

And for convert_data.py, how many folders do I expect after running it. I noticed for training stage 1, it requires multi gaussian.npy and occ.npy. How is that possible for only one volume? Or the idea is to train a vanilla 3DGS model for different volume and then feed all trained 3DGSs to VAE?

Thank you

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions