route syntax validation should s/explain when it it fails

[bhurlow]

I've found it a bit hard to debug the routing syntax when it fails to pass the valid? pre condition: https://github.com/weavejester/ataraxy/blob/master/src/ataraxy/core.clj#L65-L68

[bhurlow]

I resorted to: (s/explain :ataraxy.core/routing-table-with-meta myroutes) manually

[weavejester]

Yes, this is something I've been meaning to add, but the explain output gets a little messy around some of the rules, so I wanted to clean it up before making the validation a little better.

[bhurlow]

somebody needs to make a pretty parser for the spec output! it's almost ironic how hard to read the explain result it