metadata mismatch in :prohibit concept

[leskneebone]

The :prohibit statement looks jumbled, with rdfs:label seemingly indicating a note; skos:note indicating a definition; and skos:definition indicating another note. Also, if the 'prefer...' statement is a direction to another concept by label, it should perhaps indicate "Has prohibitions" as the correct target label.

@prefix : <http://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .

:prohibit
	a :ConflictTerm, owl:NamedIndividual, skos:Concept;
	rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ;
	rdfs:label "Prefer Prohibitions"@en ;
        skos:definition "Prohibitions take preference over permissions."@en ;
	skos:note "Used to determine policy conflict outcomes."@en .

consider changing to:

:prohibit
	a :ConflictTerm, owl:NamedIndividual, skos:Concept;
	rdfs:isDefinedBy odrl: ;
	rdfs:label "Prohibit"@en ;
        skos:definition "Used to determine policy conflict outcomes."@en ;
	skos:note "Prefer Has prohibitions. Prohibitions take preference over permissions."@en .

[riannella]

Hi @leskneebone

The "prohibit" term is part of the conflict strategy:

So the "prohibit" concept is that you want "Prohibitions to override Permissions"

Does that make sense?