-
|
For backward compatibility reasons, I need to exempt multi-line input form certain rules, but I have not been able to do so using negative lookahead, presumably because of the stated limitation of Go Regex (no support for negative lookarounds). The discussion of the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
If you could provide an example of what you're trying to do (or what you've tried to do), it would be easier for me to help. That said, as of v2.9.0, you can use lookarounds in |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
If you could provide an example of what you're trying to do (or what you've tried to do), it would be easier for me to help.
That said, as of v2.9.0, you can use lookarounds in
existence-based rules.