diff --git a/parallel-partner-initiatives-and-resources/related-initiatives-comparison.md b/parallel-partner-initiatives-and-resources/related-initiatives-comparison.md index 075b351..2d4dacf 100644 --- a/parallel-partner-initiatives-and-resources/related-initiatives-comparison.md +++ b/parallel-partner-initiatives-and-resources/related-initiatives-comparison.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Related Initiatives Comparison {% hint style="info" %} -This comparison is auto-generated from our internal database. Last updated: January 2026 +This comparison is auto-generated from our internal database. Last updated: February 2026 {% endhint %} ## Highly Related Initiatives @@ -10,37 +10,38 @@ These initiatives share significant overlap with The Unjournal's mission or are | Initiative | Type | Notes | |------------|------|-------| -| [COS LifeCycle Journal](https://lifecyclejournal.org/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | Open review/evaluation. Unjournal is an evaluation provider. Emphasis on multiple points of evaluation throughout the research life cycle | -| [Institute for Replication](https://i4replication.org/) | πŸ”„ replication/reproducibility/ro | Goal: Robustness 'replication' of all top published papers in Econ, Poli Sci, etc. Strong template and lots of credible backers. A possible partner for unjournal. | -| [Peer Communities In (PCI)/ PCI Journal](https://peercommunityin.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | PCI and the Peer Community Journal; See especially the PCI Psychology Community, and to a lesser extent the nascent Economics one | -| [Pre-print review initiative (PREreview)](https://prereview.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | We provide ways for feedback to preprints to be done openly, rapidly, constructively, and by a global community of peers." Distinctions/limitations: More of a platform than an initiative. Mostly bot | -| [Sciety](https://sciety.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | Sciety: 'curation' ... make it easier to access preprints and reviewers across platforms. We used their platform to some extent and may do so in the future. Some considerations, e.g., only able to in | -| [Arcadia](https://research.arcadiascience.com/pub/perspective-publishing-round-one/release/2) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | Crowdsourced evaluations? Suggested by Stuart Buck. I love how Arcadia Science envisions the researchΒ projectΒ not just the standalone paper.https://research.arcadiascience.com/ https://research.arcadi | -| [PCI Economics](https://econ.peercommunityin.org/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | We're in contact/collaboration | -| [PCI Psychology](https://psych.peercommunityin.org/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | We’re in contact/collaboration | +| [COS LifeCycle Journal](https://lifecyclejournal.org/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | Open review/evaluation. Unjournal is an evaluation provider. Emphasis on multiple points of evaluation throughout the research life cycle | +| [Institute for Replication](https://i4replication.org/) | πŸ”„ replication/reproducibility/robustness | Goal: Robustness 'replication' of all top published papers in Econ, Poli Sci, etc. Strong template and lots of credible backers. A possible partner for unjournal. | +| [Peer Communities In (PCI)/ PCI Journal](https://peercommunityin.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | PCI and the Peer Community Journal; See especially the PCI Psychology Community, and to a lesser extent the nascent Economics one | +| [Pre-print review initiative (PREreview)](https://prereview.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | We provide ways for feedback to preprints to be done openly, rapidly, constructively, and by a global community of peers." | +| [Sciety](https://sciety.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | | +| [Arcadia](https://research.arcadiascience.com/pub/perspective-publishing-round-one/release/2) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | Crowdsourced evaluations? Suggested by Stuart Buck.https://research.arcadiascience.com/ https://research.arcadiascience.com/reimagining-scientific-publishing | +| [PCI Economics (Coming soon?)](https://psych.peercommunityin.org/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | We’re in contact/collaboration | +| [PCI Psychology](https://psych.peercommunityin.org/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | We’re in contact/collaboration | | [PRC Alliance (Publish, Review, Curate)](https://asapbio.org/reimagining-scholarly-publishing-outcomes-from-a-public-forum-to-discuss-the-publish-review-curate-prc-publishing-model/) | 🀝 Open science collaboration | | -| [PubPub](https://www.pubpub.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | We use PubPub to host our evaluations at unjournal.pubpub.org. It has many strong features and we continue to collaborate with Knowledge Futures on development. | -| [eLife (hosted within Sciety)](https://elifesciences.org/about/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | "eLife's is/was a fairly well respected (?) journal in Life Sciences. Their New Model (originally called 'publish, review, curate') was big news. Their three month update seems fairly stable/successf | +| [PubPub](https://www.pubpub.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | We are using it to host our evaluations. It has many strong features and we plan to fund further features. Winding down? | +| [eLife (hosted within Sciety)](https://elifesciences.org/about/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | | ## Other Related Initiatives | Initiative | Type | Notes | |------------|------|-------| -| [Cascad](https://www.cascad.tech/) | πŸ”„ replication/reproducibility/ro | "the first certification agency for scientific code & data" -- a possible source of worthy 'open' work | -| [Economics e-journal](https://www.degruyterbrill.com/journal/key/econ/html) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | At least some detailed public evaluations, although they don’t make these as prominent as Unjournal. Founded 2007, owned by DeGruyter from 2020. Archi | -| [Kotahi](https://kotahi.community/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | Connected to Sciety, Elife etc. They were once hosting our editorial management platform and linking the output with a Sciety group; something we tho | -| [OSF Preprints](https://osf.io/preprints/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | Hosts (?) interfaces with multiple archives. "Pre or post-moderation". Facilitates and encourages (?) Plaudit and PREreview | -| [Openreview.net](https://Openreview.net) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | Mostly CS | -| [PLOS 'Published Peer Review"](https://theplosblog.plos.org/2022/06/observations-on-published-peer-review-history/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | "PLOS is a nonprofit, Open Access publisher empowering researchers to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in resea | -| [Plaudit - endorse a preprint](https://plaudit.pub) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | Plaudit is a third-party tool. OSF seems to encourage it (https://help.osf.io/hc/en-us/articles/360038856834-Endorse-a-Preprint). You can endorse the | -| [ResearchHub](https://www.researchhub.com/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | Hub to upload/link DOI'd research, by subject. Comments and 'costly' upvotes/downvotes (?), no explicit 'reviewing' process. For-profit? "... a modern | -| [Scipost](https://scipost.org/about) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | Making good inroads in physics+ Distinctions/considerations: physics+-focused, exclusive publishing, may not allow dynamic formats or continuous impro | -| [Alethia](https://aletheia-platform.netlify.app/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | Has most of Unjournal's features, but no quantitative measures, no external funding for evaluators, and seems very small. A platform for disseminatin | -| [In&vertebrates](https://inandsight.science/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | | -| [Nature Human Behavior](https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/editorial-policies/peer-review) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | Optional transparent peer review (author opt-in, for accepted work) | -| [ReviewCommons](https://www.reviewcommons.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | Review Commons is a platform for high-quality journal-independent peer-review in the life sciences." Pre-prints reviewed, streams into (regular and OA | -| Science Open | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/ratin | Working with traditional and open journals and trying to bring in stakeholders. Seems to foster academic editor-based curation. But tied to traditiona | -| [SqARE](https://sqare.org/faq/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiat | Nascent? Econometrics focused, not sure if it will get off the ground | +| ASAPBio | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | | +| [Cascad](https://www.cascad.tech/) | πŸ”„ replication/reproducibility/robustness | "the first certification agency for scientific code & data" -- a possible source of worthy 'open' work | +| [Economics e-journal](https://www.degruyterbrill.com/journal/key/econ/html) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | At least some detailed public evaluations, although they don’t make these as prominent as Unjournal. Founded 2007, owned by DeGruyter from 2020. | +| [Kotahi](https://kotahi.community/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | Connected to | +| [OSF Preprints](https://osf.io/preprints/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | Hosts (?) interfaces with multiple archives. "Pre or post-moderation". Facilitates and encourages (?) Plaudit and PREreview | +| [Openreview.net](https://Openreview.net) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | Mostly CS | +| [PLOS 'Published Peer Review"](https://theplosblog.plos.org/2022/06/observations-on-published-peer-review-history/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | "PLOS is a nonprofit, Open Access publisher empowering researchers to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in... | +| [Plaudit - endorse a preprint](https://plaudit.pub) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | Plaudit is a third-party tool. OSF seems to encourage it (https://help.osf.io/hc/en-us/articles/360038856834-Endorse-a-Preprint). | +| [ResearchHub](https://www.researchhub.com/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | Hub to upload/link DOI'd research, by subject. Comments and 'costly' upvotes/downvotes (?), no explicit 'reviewing' process. For-profit? "... | +| [Scipost](https://scipost.org/about) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | Making good inroads in physics+ | +| [Alethia](https://aletheia-platform.netlify.app/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | Has most of Unjournal's features, but no quantitative measures, no external funding for evaluators, and seems very small. | +| [In&vertebrates](https://inandsight.science/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | | +| [Nature Human Behavior](https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/editorial-policies/peer-review) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | Optional transparent peer review (author opt-in, for accepted work) | +| [ReviewCommons](https://www.reviewcommons.org/) | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | Review Commons is a platform for high-quality journal-independent peer-review in the life sciences." Pre-prints reviewed, | +| Science Open | πŸ”§ Platform/tool: reviewing/rating/endorsing (and publishing) | Working with traditional and open journals and trying to bring in stakeholders. Seems to foster academic editor-based curation. | +| [SqARE](https://sqare.org/faq/) | πŸ“„ Open public evaluation initiative or innovative journal | Nascent? Econometrics focused | | [Stanford Program on Research Rigor & Reproducibility (SPORR)](https://med.stanford.edu/sporr) | 🀝 Open science collaboration | Focus on medicine? | --- diff --git a/readme-1/discussion-team/README.md b/readme-1/discussion-team/README.md index 088352f..c94f87b 100644 --- a/readme-1/discussion-team/README.md +++ b/readme-1/discussion-team/README.md @@ -1,68 +1,87 @@ -# Our team - -{% hint style="info" %} -**Canonical source**: For the most up-to-date team information, see our [Team page at unjournal.org](https://www.unjournal.org/team). - -The information below may lag behind the main site. Team members can update details in our [internal Coda workspace](https://coda.io/d/The-Unjournal-Hub-internal_d0KBG3dSZCs/Our-team_suYYbcbI). -{% endhint %} - -_The Unjournal_ was founded by [David Reinstein](https://davidreinstein.org), who maintains this GitBook and other resources. +--- +description: Auto-generated from Coda. Last synced: 2026-02-04 +--- -See also: [governance-of-the-unjournal.md](../../management-tech-details-discussion/governance-of-the-unjournal.md "mention") +# Our Team ## Management Team -* **[David Reinstein](https://www.davidreinstein.org)** β€” Founding Director -* **[Anirudh Tagat](https://www.anirudhtagat.com/)** β€” Co-Director (Monk Prayogshala) -* **Davit Jintcharadze** β€” Manager of Operations -* **[Gavin Taylor](https://onscienceandacademia.org/t/gavin-taylor/356)** β€” Staff (RF Antivirals) -* **[Bob Kubinec](https://www.bobkubinec.com/)** β€” Staff (University of South Carolina) -* **[Hansika Kapoor](https://www.hansikakapoor.in)** β€” Staff (Monk Prayogshala) -* **[Ryan Briggs](https://www.ryancbriggs.net/)** β€” Staff (University of Guelph) -* **[Emmanuel Orkoh](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=hMW0bj4AAAAJ&hl=en)** β€” Staff (Nordic Africa Institute) -* **[Rosie Bettle](https://www.linkedin.com/in/rosie-bettle-84a1051b0/)** β€” Staff (Founders Pledge) -* **[Alexander Herwix](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alexander-Herwix)** β€” Staff (Cologne Institute for Information Systems) -* **Andrei Potlogea** β€” Staff (University of Edinburgh) +- [Alexander Herwix](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alexander-Herwix) β€” Leipzig University, Info. sys. +- [Andrei Potlogea](https://sites.google.com/site/andreipotlogeaupf/) +- [Anirudh Tagat](https://www.anirudhtagat.com) β€” Monk Prayogshala, Econ. +- [Bob Kubinec](https://www.robertkubinec.com/) β€” University of Virginia +- David Reinstein, Founder & Co-Director +- [Gavin Taylor](https://www.linkedin.com/in/gavin-taylor-9a409453/?originalSubdomain=br) β€” IGDORE, Neurosci. +- [Hansika Kapoor](https://www.hansikakapoor.in/) β€” Monk Prayogshala, Psych. +- [Rosie Bettle](https://uk.linkedin.com/in/rosie-bettle-84a1051b0?original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F) β€” Founders Pledge +- [Ryan Briggs](https://www.ryancbriggs.net/) β€” University of Guelph, Pol. Sci ## Advisory Board -* [Andrew Gelman](http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/) β€” Columbia University -* [Sam Abbott](https://samabbott.co.uk) β€” London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine -* [Anca Hanea](https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/697859-anca-hanea) β€” University of Melbourne -* [Gary Charness](https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Gary_Charness) β€” UC Santa Barbara _(in memoriam, 1950–2024)_ -* [Jonathan Berman](https://www.london.edu/faculty-and-research/faculty-profiles/b/berman-j-z-1) β€” London Business School -* [Daniela Cialfi](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daniela-Cialfi) β€” University of Chieti -* [Jordan Dworkin](https://coefficientgiving.com/) β€” Coefficient Giving -* [Jake Eaton](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jake-eaton-phd-bb204634/) β€” Asterisk Magazine -* [Conor Hughes](https://pop.umn.edu/people/conor-hughes) β€” University of Minnesota -* [Jana Lasser](https://www.janalasser.at/) β€” Graz University of Technology -* [Nicolas Treich](https://www.nicolastreich.com/) β€” Toulouse School of Economics -* [Michael Wiebe](https://michaelwiebe.com/) β€” Economist -* [Don A. Moore](https://haas.berkeley.edu/faculty/don-moore/) β€” Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley -* [Kris Gulati](https://www.kris-gulati.com/) β€” UC Berkeley -* [Demetrius Floudas](https://www.cambridge.org/) β€” University of Cambridge -* [Lorenzo Pacchiardi](https://lorenzopacchiardi.me/) β€” University of Cambridge -* [Stuart Buck](https://goodscienceproject.org/) β€” Good Science Project -* [Michael Harre](https://www.sydney.edu.au/) β€” University of Sydney -* [Tanya O'Garra](https://www.imperial.ac.uk/) β€” Imperial College London -* [Paolo Crosetto](https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/) β€” INRAE +- [Anca Hanea](https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/697859-anca-hanea) β€” University of Melbourne,RepliCATS +- Daniela Cialfi β€” Econ. +- Davit Jintcharadze (former Operations Manager) +- [Emmanuel Orkoh](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=hMW0bj4AAAAJ&hl=en) β€” North-West University, South Africa, Econ. +- [Gustav Nilsonne](https://nilsonne.net/) β€” Karolinska Institutet, Neurosci. +- [Jake Eaton](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jake-eaton-phd-bb204634/) β€” Asterisk magazine, Pub. health +- [Jordan Dworkin](https://jordandworkin.com/) β€” Federation of American Scientists, Biostats. +- [Kris Gulati](https://sites.google.com/view/kris-gulati/home) β€” UC Merced, Econ. +- Lorenzo Pacchiardi β€” Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence +- [Michael Wiebe](https://michaelwiebe.com/) β€” Econ. +- [Nicolas Treich](https://scholar.google.fr/citations?user=-S6D7OsAAAAJ&hl=en) β€” Institut National de la Recherche pour l’Agriculture,l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAe), Econ. +- [Sarah Anne Reynolds](https://sites.google.com/view/sarah-a-reynolds/home) β€” World Bank, Econ., GH +- [Tanya O'Garra](https://sites.google.com/view/tanyaogarra/home) β€” Imperial College London, Econ. +- [Yannick Dupraz](https://sites.google.com/site/yannickdupraz/) ## Field Specialists -We have 60+ field specialists and research affiliates organized by expertise areas including development economics, global health, behavioral science, environmental economics, AI governance, and animal welfare. - -The table below shows team members taking on research-monitoring roles (see [field specialist role description](../organizational-roles-and-responsibilities/#field-specialists-fs)): - -{% embed url="https://airtable.com/applDG6ifmUmeEJ7j/shrFwsCw7qpg8m0Ua" %} +- [Andrew Kao](https://andrew-kao.github.io/) β€” Harvard University, Econ. +- [Ben Balmford](https://www.benbalmford.com/) β€” Exeter, Econ. +- [Brinda Poojary](https://www.linkedin.com/in/brinda-poojary-phd-ba075458/?originalSubdomain=in) β€” Humane Society International - India,India Animal Fund +- [Bryan Weber](https://www.linkedin.com/in/bryan-s-weber/) β€” CUNY +- [Carina Ines Hausladen](https://carinahausladen.github.io/) β€” EtH Zurich, Econ. +- [Charlotte Lane](https://www.foodsecurityevidence.com/) β€” Food Security Evidence Brokerage,3ie +- [David Manheim](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=6-M1ZIUAAAAJ&hl=en) β€” Association for Long Term Existence and Resilience (ALTER),Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Econ. +- Eliana Hadjiandreou β€” Computational Affective and Social Cognition +- [Emmanuel Orkoh](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=hMW0bj4AAAAJ&hl=en) β€” North-West University, South Africa, Econ. +- [Florian Habermacher](https://habermacher.net/) β€” Lucerne University,Swiss Institution for International Economics, Econ. +- [Francesco Ramponi](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=DdbGN6UAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao) β€” Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Econ., GH +- [Gary McDowell](https://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-mcdowell-4551131a/) β€” IGDORE +- [Greg Sasso](https://gregsasso.me/) β€” University of Chicago +- [Hannah Metzler](https://hannahmetzler.eu/) +- [Joel Christoph](https://www.linkedin.com/in/joelchristoph/) β€” Effective Thesis project, Econ. +- [Jonah Goldberg](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonah-s-goldberg/) β€” Harvard Dept. of Global Health and Population, Econ. +- [Josh Tasoff](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=pyjguMoAAAAJ&hl=en) β€” Claremont Graduate University, Econ. +- Julian Jamison β€” Global Priorities Institute,Exeter, Econ. +- [Kevin J Kuruc](https://sites.google.com/view/kevinkuruc/home) β€” University of Texas at Austin, Econ. +- [Kris Gulati](https://sites.google.com/view/kris-gulati/home) β€” UC Merced, Econ. +- [Lachlan Deer](https://lachlandeer.github.io/) β€” Tilburg University +- [Lee Crawfurd](https://sites.google.com/view/leecrawfurd/home) +- Lorenzo Pacchiardi β€” Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence +- [Mattie Toma](https://www.mattietoma.com/) β€” University of Warwick +- [Moritz Hennicke](https://hennicke.science/) β€” University of Bremen +- Nathan Fiala β€” University of Connecticut, Econ. +- [Priya Lall](https://www.linkedin.com/in/priya-lall-64152816/) β€” University of Oxford +- Rakefet Cohen Ben-Arye +- [Sarah Anne Reynolds](https://sites.google.com/view/sarah-a-reynolds/home) β€” World Bank, Econ., GH +- Sean Brocklebank β€” Econ. +- [Tabare Capitan](https://www.tabarecapitan.com) β€” SLU - Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Econ. +- [Tanya O'Garra](https://sites.google.com/view/tanyaogarra/home) β€” Imperial College London, Econ. +- [Tristan Williams](https://www.linkedin.com/in/tristan-williams-916119216/) β€” Center for AI Policy +- [Valentin KlotzbΓΌcher](https://valentink.quarto.pub/) β€” University Hospital Basel, Econ., GH +- [Wayne Sandholtz](https://waynesandholtz.com/) β€” Nova School of Business and Economics, Econ. +- [William Seitz](https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/team/w/william-seitz) β€” World Bank - PROGREEN + +## Unjournal Research Affiliates + +26 research affiliates contribute to research prioritization, evaluation management, and field expertise. ## Evaluator Pool -Over 200 people have signed up to assess research for The Unjournal, including approximately 90 PhD holders and 40 professors. +Over 200 people have signed up to assess research for The Unjournal, including approximately 90 PhD holders and 40 professors. See [evaluator pool statistics](https://coda.io/d/Unjournal-Public-Pages_ddIEzDONWdb/Statistics-Evaluator-pool_sunNUx0l#_luakesYJ). Interested in becoming an evaluator? [Sign up here](https://airtable.com/appbPYEw9nURln7Qg/shrtMv4hNlv8aL7Yy). ---- -
Other collaborators and consultants @@ -77,3 +96,7 @@ We maintain relationships with many researchers and initiatives in open science * Daniel Saderi β€” PREreview
+ +--- + +*Interested in joining? See [how to get involved](https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/readme-1/call-for-participants-research) or [get in touch](mailto:contact@unjournal.org).* \ No newline at end of file