Skip to content

oai.samvera validation results #717

@christinklez

Description

@christinklez

observed in UCLA collections; inconsistent type mapping issue

  • type: Lots of UCLA's collections are dropping type--this occurs in both the legacy and Rikolti harvester (with both have type: none); it seems that Rikolti is not mapping the type data consistently. Note that UCLA is using Library of Congress URI schema https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/resourceTypes.html -- see 27371 & 28111 for examples (among many others).

Some notes on type:
It seems that some collections (example: 159) are fetching the URI & mapping the type correctly:
vernacular: <dc:type>http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/resourceTypes/img</dc:type>
mapped: "type": ["Image"]

It also seems that some collections (example: 27371) are fetching the <dc:type> URI but not mapping the type:
vernacular: <dc:type>http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/resourceTypes/img</dc:type> or <dc:type>http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/resourceTypes/txt</dc:type>
mapped: (no data)
oai: https://digital.library.ucla.edu/catalog/oai?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix=oai_dpla&set=member_of_collection_ids_ssim:bvt38c1z-89112
oai for the first record listed in the report: https://digital.library.ucla.edu/catalog/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dpla&identifier=oai:library.ucla.edu:ark:/21198/z1030930

Running list of examples that seem to have this issue: 28087, 28089, 28091, 28092, 28093, 28094, 28095, 28096, 28097, 28098, 28099, 28100, 28101, 28102, 28103, 28104, 28106, 28107, 28108, 28109, 28110, 28113, 28114, 28115, 28116

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    data validationRikolti mapper data validation review needed

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions