Special situation of US minor IC changing to major IC

[panther2]

In the special case that the US decide to enter a state of war at the beginning of the US Collect Income Phase on US turn 3, the minor factories in Eastern United States, Central United States and Western United States should convert to major factories at the same time (and not at the beginning of the US Combat Move Phase in the next US turn).

(The issue that the USA may choose to stay out of war at that point is already in the game notes.)

[simon33-2]

But the only issue caused is the incorrect warning about too many units bought USA4.

If we wanted to fix that properly, we'd change it so that the warning was to ask if you wanted to declare war and reject the purchase if you didn't.

[panther2]

IMHO the incorrect warning is a consequence of that issue.
The timing of major IC switching to minor IC as happening now in TripleA is not according to the rules - so this is the issue.
Your idea is a workaround, of course, but not a fix to become rules-compliant.

[simon33-2]

Actually, what I was saying would make it rules compliant. Notice I said to reject the purchase if they don't want to DOW which resolves the issues remaining with purchasing too many.

[simon33-2]

There are also incorrect warnings bought on other rounds where the DOW is intended and more than 9 units are bought. Also, allowing you to buy too many units or not place bought units are other problems. Most of these problems could be solved by changing the order to Combat Move before Purchase/Repair but that would not be (strictly) rules compliant. Change the rules, I say.

[panther2]

Never change the rules, I say ;-)
Or change the rules, but do it on different maps (or game.xml), then.

Again, my concern with this issue is not that warning. My concern is the correct handling of the process.

In the given case it would be:

1. On turn 3 at the beginning of the US Collect Income Phase let the US decide to enter a state of war or not.

2a) If they decide going to war immediately change the minor IC to major IC, proceed with collecting income.

2b) If they decide not to go to war proceed with collecting income.

And regarding those incorrect warnings let us open another issue.

[simon33-2]

So you aren't worried about the warnings for buying too many units on a USA1-3 combat move DOW, only on the special DOW at the end of the income phase? Why?

I'm thinking about adding a map with the combat movement before purchase/repair. That way, if you don't want to use it, you don't have to.

[panther2]

So you aren't worried about the warnings for buying too many units on a USA1-3 combat move DOW, only on the special DOW at the end of the income phase? Why?

It was you who added the aspects of the warnings. When I opened this issue I was only talking about the timing of minors changing to majors in that special situation - as explained here:
#4 (comment)

Actually I am not concerned about the warnings because they are absolutely obsolete:

According to the rules in the Puchase Unit Phase you are allowed to buy as many units as you can afford. So technically there is no need to check, whether those units can be placed, so you don't need a warning. According to the rules this check takes place in the Unit Placement Phase. If you (inadvertently (as per FAQ)) bought more units than you can place, you get your money back for those units, that cannot be placed.

Maybe those warnings derive from an edition where overpurchased units have been treated differently. But that would be another map, then.

So concerning the warnings I would be fine with an Issue called "remove overbuy warnings in Purchase Unit Phase".

I'm thinking about adding a map with the combat movement before purchase/repair. That way, if you don't want to use it, you don't have to.

Sounds good to me.

[simon33-2]

Yeah, but Kreighund has clarified that the rule about refunding units not able to be placed (which aren't actually supposed to be held over) is only supposed to be used for inadvertent over purchasing. It's not supposed to be able to be gamed by buying a lot of inf and some more expensive units then placing units based on the results of battles.

[panther2]

Yes correct, I am aware of this. But the warning itself would not prevent from an intentional overbuy, but only confirm the buying player's intention. The opponent would not see it at the moment it is committed.

So the warning for the buying player in this case is pointless, too.

It would be up to the opponent to object, when noticing an intentional overbuy. In a forum game that would become notable by the time of the turn post. The players would probably start a discussion about an intentional overbuy, then.

Side note: The part of the FAQ dealing with intentional overbuy (=Krieghund's clarification) has not made it into the latest version of the rulebooks (while many of the other parts are included). Not sure what that means... but if this might become important, I will ask him about that.

[simon33-2]

You could add a map property to the engine "MustPlace" or similar. So then you would force placements and have to prompt for DOW if more than 9 units bought.

I just don't see this as an important issue. It can be player enforced.

[panther2]

You could add a map property to the engine "MustPlace" or similar. So then you would force placements and have to prompt for DOW if more than 9 units bought.

I just don't see this as an important issue. It can be player enforced.

Yes.

[simon33-2]

There is one problem with changing the order - if you are going to land on a newly built CV triple A won't allow you to attack with air.

[panther2]

Yes, the engine can't know, that the purchase of the Carrier will occur after the combat move of the Planes.
Napoleonic Empire is a map, where combat move comes before purchase, IIRC. But there are no comparable units, I suppose.