I2C Audio & VS1053 Audio library updating (notes for future effort) #39
Description
I2S_Audio
- likely adapted https://github.com/schreibfaul1/ESP32-audioI2S
- from Maleksm's yoRadio mod v0.9.512m: https://4pda.to/forum/index.php?showtopic=1010378&st=11240#entry125839228
- Maleksm says source from Wolle (schreibfaul1) 3.3.2l on 2025.07.09
- attempt to update using Maleksm's mod v0.9.533m failed (probably due to similar issues as below)
VS1053_Audio
- original DNA in https://github.com/Edzelf/Esp-radio and https://github.com/Edzelf/Esp-radio2
- but then replaced with https://github.com/schreibfaul1/ESP32-vs1053_ext
- likely adapted from https://github.com/nstepanets/ESP32-vs1053_ext
- from Maleksm's yoRadio mod v0.9.512m: https://4pda.to/forum/index.php?showtopic=1010378&st=11240#entry125839228
- Maleksm says source from Wolle (schreibfaul1) 3.0.13t on 2024.11.16
- attempt to update using Maleksm's mod v0.9.533m failed (probably due to similar issues as below)
Further notes
Attempts were made to full upgrade to more recent versions from https://github.com/schreibfaul1/ESP32-audioI2S and https://github.com/nstepanets/ESP32-vs1053_ext
But these lines will be required in platformio.ini:
[env]
platform = espressif32@6.10.0 ; needed to support GCC 11.2.0
platform_packages =
; this allows gnu++20 (for span function in I2C_Audio)
toolchain-xtensa-esp32 @ ~11.2.0 ; ESP32 (original)
toolchain-xtensa-esp32s2 @ ~11.2.0 ; ESP32-S2
toolchain-xtensa-esp32s3 @ ~11.2.0 ; ESP32-S3
toolchain-riscv32-esp @ ~11.2.0 ; ESP32-C3/C6/H2 (RISC-V)
build_unflags =
-std=gnu++11
-std=gnu++14
-std=gnu++17
build_flags =
-std=gnu++20
A modification may be needed to Audio.h:
#if ESP_IDF_VERSION >= ESP_IDF_VERSION_VAL(5, 0, 0)
#include <driver/i2s_std.h>
#else
#include <driver/i2s.h>
#endif
Also, it looks like:
#include <WiFiClient.h>
#include <WiFiClientSecure.h>
Will all need to be replaced with:
#include <NetworkClient.h>
#include <NetworkClientSecure.h>
Because new Arduino-ESP32 v3.x uses unified network API. ehRadio still uses the old v2.x API.
That would likely be a very large re-factor.