-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Open
Description
See for example here:
macleod/src/macleod/dl/translation.py
Lines 106 to 125 in e945bab
| def class_assertion(pattern, ontology): | |
| ''' | |
| TODO: Actually write these | |
| ''' | |
| # Existing classes | |
| classes = [*ontology.classes] | |
| individuals = [*ontology.individuals] | |
| class_name = pattern[1][0].name | |
| individual = pattern[1][0].variables[0] | |
| # Create any missing classes found in the pattern | |
| if class_name not in classes: | |
| ontology.declare_class(class_name) | |
| classes.append(class_name) | |
| if individual not in individuals: | |
| ontology.declare_individual(individual) | |
| individuals.append(individual) |
It seems like that these are already taken care of here:
macleod/src/macleod/Ontology.py
Line 689 in e945bab
| for unary in axiom.unary(): |
Same for properties, but not individuals. Should we take a similar approach for individuals (constants): to declare all of them even those not in any pattern?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels