Skip to content

Users too frequently have to make an ARMI PR to touch Settings and Parameters #2384

@john-science

Description

@john-science

@keckler noted that ARMI developers too frequently have to make PRs into ARMI to deal with Settings and Parameters defined in ARMI. That is a system design problem. It seems to me the only solution here is to make sure ARMI includes fewer mandatory Settings and Parameters.

Other than that, I think the order-of-operations goes something like this:

NOTE: Some Settings and Parameters are useful to a wide nuclear reactor audience, and we will keep them in ARMI on general principles.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

cleanupCode/comment cleanup: Low Priority

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions