The standard incorrectly implies that c32encode uses Crockford Base32

[ssg]

The text "hello world" encodes to "D1JPRV3F41VPYWKCCG" in Crockford Base32 while the example given for c32encode in the README says it would encode to "38CNP6RVS0EXQQ4V34" instead. The implementation seems significantly different too, like handling of zero prefixes, isolated handling of the version prefix, and encoding from the end like Base58, and so forth.

Yet the README states that c32encode uses "Crockford Base32". I find that misleading since the outputs seem incompatible. It seems like at least a separate specification is needed for c32encode.