QuantLib ready for review

[mihakralj]

@squideyes please swing by QuantLib repo and let me know what you think... I'd like to hear if my approach with pub-sub events between indicators make sense - and what do you see are weak spots - before I continue adding to the current pile of code.

There are few .NET interactive notebooks in /Docs folder - but documentation is far from complete.

[squideyes]

Happy to hear you’re continuing on with your trading code. I’m out and about today but I’ll be sure to give the code a look see tonight and then get back to you Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>

…

________________________________ From: Miha Kralj ***@***.***> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 11:28:40 PM To: squideyes/TechAnalysis ***@***.***> Cc: Louis S. Berman ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: [squideyes/TechAnalysis] QuantLib ready for review (Issue #1) @squideyes<https://github.com/squideyes> please swing by QuantLib<https://github.com/mihakralj/QuantLib> repo and let me know what you think... I'd like to hear if my approach with pub-sub events between indicators make sense - and what do you see are weak spots - before I continue adding to the current pile of code. There are few .NET interactive notebooks in /Docs folder - but documentation is far from complete. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABACOHCML5HW4HACLDRTEXTVCERORANCNFSM5RZZDVYA>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>