Modify LLM Prompts #32
Description
Large language models usually gravitate towards relation patterns(vector embeddings) to generate response especially when corresponding towards a predictable output. So I made some changes:
The excepted output example json schema:
{
"method": "SVC",
"dataset": "Iris",
"task": "classification",
"accuracy": 1.0,
"C": 1.0,
"degree": 3,
"tol": 0.001,
"cache_size": 200,
"max_iter": -1,
"test_size": 0.2,
"random_state": 42,
"kernel": "linear",
"condition_as_natural_langauge": [
"Using linear kernel on SVC model.",
"Excluding class 2 from Iris dataset.",
"Splitting data into 80% training and 20% testing."
],
"advice_to_improve_acc": [
"Consider using cross-validation for better performance evaluation.",
"Experiment with different kernels to optimize results.",
"Increase the dataset size to improve generalization."
]
}
The output is pretty much the same since it was directed towards a generative response, almost!
The output when removed example schema:
response: {
"method": "Support Vector Machine",
"dataset": "Iris",
"task": "Classification",
"accuracy": 1.0,
"other_param_here": {
"C": 1.0,
"kernel": "linear",
"degree": 3,
"gamma": "auto",
"coef0": 0.0,
"shrinking": true,
"probability": false,
"tol": 0.001,
"cache_size": 200,
"class_weight": null,
"verbose": false,
"max_iter": -1,
"decision_function_shape": "ovr",
"break_ties": false,
"random_state": null,
"test_size": 0.2,
"random_state_tts": 42,
"shuffle": true,
"stratify": true
},
"condition_as_natural_language": [
"Binarized class labels (excluding Class 2).",
"Excluded Class 1 from evaluation."
],
"advice_to_improve_acc": [
"Use a more complex model.",
"Use a larger dataset.",
"Try different hyperparameters."
]
}
The response without excepted output referred on the notebook:
response without excepted parameters and example output on notefile --> {"condition_as_natural_language": [
"Iris dataset with two classes (0 and 2)"
],
"param_name_1": "test_size",
"param_value_1": 0.2,
"param_name_2": "random_state",
"param_value_2": 42,
"param_name_3": "shuffle",
"param_value_3": true,
"param_name_4": "stratify",
"param_value_4": "labels",
"param_name_5": "C",
"param_value_5": 1.0,
"param_name_6": "kernel",
"param_value_6": "linear",
"param_name_7": "degree",
"param_value_7": 3,
"param_name_8": "gamma",
"param_value_8": "auto",
"param_name_9": "coef0",
"param_value_9": 0.0,
"param_name_10": "shrinking",
"param_value_10": true,
"param_name_11": "probability",
"param_value_11": false,
"param_name_12": "tol",
"param_value_12": 0.001,
"param_name_13": "cache_size",
"param_value_13": 200,
"param_name_14": "class_weight",
"param_value_14": null,
"param_name_15": "verbose",
"param_value_15": false,
"param_name_16": "max_iter",
"param_value_16": -1,
"param_name_17": "decision_function_shape",
"param_value_17": "ovr",
"param_name_18": "break_ties",
"param_value_18": false,
"param_name_19": "random_state",
"param_value_19": null,
"param_name_20": "excluded_class",
"param_value_20": 1,
"result_name_1": "accuracy",
"result_value_1": 1.0,
"result_name_2": "precision",
"result_value_2": 1.0,
"result_name_3": "recall",
"result_value_3": 1.0,
"result_name_4": "f1-score",
"result_value_4": 1.0,
"result_name_5": "support",
"result_value_5": 10,
"advice": "Try different kernels (e.g., 'rbf', 'poly') and tune hyperparameters like C and gamma to improve accuracy."
}
Seemed more accurate and informative when retuned.
configuration response --> Temperature 0.1