Skip to content

org.I0Itec vs com.101tec #80

@zenglian

Description

@zenglian

There are some problems with the package name:
(1) The package name is inconsistent with the artifiact/domain name.
(2) According to Java's naming convention, package name should be in lower case.
(3) I pretends to be 1 seems not to be a good idea...

I understand 101tec is not a valid package name in java. IMO, even l0ltec is better than I0Itec, and com.I0Itec is better than org.I0Itec. But if I were you, I would considering another domain name (not starting with number).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions