-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 484
org.I0Itec vs com.101tec #80
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Description
There are some problems with the package name:
(1) The package name is inconsistent with the artifiact/domain name.
(2) According to Java's naming convention, package name should be in lower case.
(3) I pretends to be 1 seems not to be a good idea...
I understand 101tec is not a valid package name in java. IMO, even l0ltec is better than I0Itec, and com.I0Itec is better than org.I0Itec. But if I were you, I would considering another domain name (not starting with number).
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels