`read_next_or_eof`'s API prevents buffer reuse

[DavidVentura]

Hi!
I'm trying to use claxon in an embedded environment and would like to reuse the decode buffer, but I'm not figuring out how to do this when I might have multiple frames to decode in a single buffer:

impl Decode for FlacDecoder {
    fn decode_sample(&mut self, buf: &[u8], out: &mut [i16]) -> Result<usize, anyhow::Error> {
        let mut fr = FrameReader::new(std::io::Cursor::new(buf));
        let mut c = 0;
        let mut v = std::mem::take(&mut self.dec_buf);
        loop {
            if let Ok(Some(block)) = fr.read_next_or_eof(v) {
                for (a, b) in block.stereo_samples() {
                    out[c + 0] = a as i16;
                    out[c + 1] = b as i16;
                    c += 2;
                }
                v = block.into_buffer();
            } else {
                break;
            }
        }
        // self.dec_buf = v;
        // can't do this, `v` was moved into  `read_next_or_eof` 
        // and both the `Err` and `Ok(None)` cases would lose the buffer
        Ok(c)
    }
}

I've made a branch with an API change which allows passing a mutable reference, but this breaks the FlacSamples and FlacIntoSamples iterators

[ruuda]

Yes, this is a limitation of the current design. For a future version, I think I would split it into a lower-level API that reads and decodes one block, with higher level iterator-like functions built on top. (For the audio data it’s not a big change, but especially for the metadata frames, right now we either have to read all of them and store them, or skip over them, there is no way to stream them and inspect only the interesting ones. For that I think a split into a lower-level API and a higher-level one makes sense.)

If you’re in a context where Vec::resize is fine though, I suppose allocating is acceptable, so maybe it’s okay to assign v = Vec::new() in the Err case?