71 lines (49 loc) · 1.86 KB

Who this is for

GRITS is deliberately built for two adjacent audiences.

1. Builders and operators who need immediate value

This includes:

OpenClaw users
NemoClaw users
self-hosters
tinkerers
small agent teams
developers shipping internal LLM apps

What they usually care about

can I harden this quickly
what should I fix first
what controls actually apply to my setup
how do I avoid turning this into bureaucracy

What to read first

2. Teams planning to operate many agents over time

This includes:

enterprise AI platform teams
security teams
governance teams
enterprise architects
operating model owners

What they usually care about

which agents exist
who owns them
what they are allowed to do
how promotion and runtime changes are governed
how trust decays or is renewed
how orphaned or shadow agents are handled

What to read first

When GRITS is probably not the right first thing

GRITS is not the best first stop if you are looking only for:

a new runtime to run agents
a fully managed enterprise product
a formal certification regime
sector-specific legal or regulatory mapping out of the box

Why GRITS tries to serve both groups

If the framework only serves builders, it stays tactical. If it only serves enterprise governance teams, it becomes shelfware.

GRITS exists to connect the two:

concrete deployment baselines for adoption
lifecycle governance references for scale