Thanks for helping improve GRITS.
The most useful contributions right now are:
- runtime baselines and playbooks grounded in real deployments
- lifecycle edge cases and governance failure modes
- signal and event schema feedback
- example scorecards and remediation flows
- profile refinements that reduce ambiguity without adding bureaucracy
- implementation over abstraction
- explicit scope over vague generality
- portability over vendor lock-in
- evidence over assertions
- simple first release over premature completeness
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| baseline | runtime-specific minimum control set |
| playbook | remediation or operational sequence |
| profile | tailored applicability guidance |
| signal or event feedback | runtime event names, evidence payloads, drift triggers |
| assessment example | scorecards, findings, remediation ordering |
- turning GRITS into a full product spec
- overfitting to one runtime as if it were universal
- adding sector-specific complexity before the core stabilizes
- adding long philosophy sections without operational consequence
- describe the problem to solve
- say which audience benefits
- state whether it belongs in Core, Profile, Baseline, Playbook, Signals, or Assessment
- include concrete examples when possible