Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 20, 2026. It is now read-only.

Latest commit

 

History

History
52 lines (44 loc) · 3.32 KB

File metadata and controls

52 lines (44 loc) · 3.32 KB

Rubric Coverage Report

Coverage: 10/23 ADDRESSED (43%) Threshold: 80% PARTIAL: 11 | GAP: 2 | CRITICAL GAP: 0 Result: FAIL


Rubric Items

# Status Requirement Section Score
R-01 ADDRESSED Attack taxonomy for autonomous AI agents (extending OWASP/AT Executive Summary 0.71
R-02 ADDRESSED Red-team scripts for 4+ attack classes against open-source a Executive Summary 0.89
R-03 ADDRESSED Adversarial control analysis applied to agent input/output a RQ3: Adversarial Control Analysis — Controllability Drives Defense Difficulty 0.88
R-04 PARTIAL Defensive architecture patterns with measured effectiveness Architectural Recommendations 0.40
R-05 ADDRESSED Open-source red-team framework (CLI tool, not just scripts) Executive Summary 0.67
R-06 PARTIAL Attacking production/deployed agents (only local controlled Limitations 0.25
R-07 PARTIAL Jailbreaking LLMs (prompt injection FOR agent misuse, not ju RQ1: Attack Taxonomy — What Can Go Wrong? 0.44
R-08 PARTIAL Training custom models (use existing LLMs as the agent backb Executive Summary 0.29
R-09 PARTIAL Multi-agent coordination attacks (stretch goal only) Architectural Recommendations 0.43
R-10 ADDRESSED Multi-agent attack chains (Agent A compromises Agent B throu RQ1: Attack Taxonomy — What Can Go Wrong? 0.62
R-11 PARTIAL Benchmark suite that others can run against their own agents Architectural Recommendations 0.43
R-12 PARTIAL huntr submission if novel vulnerability discovered in LangCh Executive Summary 0.38
R-13 ADDRESSED [ ] Attack taxonomy documented (≥5 classes beyond OWASP/ATLA Executive Summary 0.71
R-14 ADDRESSED [ ] ≥3 attack classes demonstrated against ≥2 agent framewor Executive Summary 1.00
R-15 ADDRESSED [ ] Adversarial control analysis applied to agent I/O archit RQ3: Adversarial Control Analysis — Controllability Drives Defense Difficulty 0.83
R-16 GAP [ ] ≥2 defensive patterns tested with measured effectiveness Executive Summary 0.20
R-17 GAP [ ] All code in version-controlled repo (GitHub) RQ1: Attack Taxonomy — What Can Go Wrong? 0.20
R-18 PARTIAL [ ] CLI tool installable via pip RQ1: Attack Taxonomy — What Can Go Wrong? 0.40
R-19 ADDRESSED [ ] FINDINGS.md written with key results + architecture diag (full text search) 0.67
R-20 PARTIAL [ ] DECISION_LOG has all tradeoff decisions from every phase Architectural Recommendations 0.25
R-21 PARTIAL [ ] PUBLICATION_PIPELINE.md filled and blog draft started What's Next 0.25
R-22 PARTIAL [ ] LESSONS_LEARNED.md in govML updated with FP-02 issues an FINDINGS — Agent Security Red-Team Framework (FP-02) 0.25
R-23 ADDRESSED [ ] Conference abstract ready for BSides / DEF CON AI Villag What's Next 0.62

Common Gap Pattern Warnings

The following common rubric patterns were NOT detected in the report:

  • distance metric justification
  • similarity metric justification
  • hyperparameter search range
  • hyperparameter sensitivity
  • initialization choice
  • convergence criteria
  • reward function details
  • ablation analysis
  • noise sensitivity
  • suggested improvements