diff --git a/docs/economics/token-economics-synthesis.md b/docs/economics/token-economics-synthesis.md
index f933a82..d098af7 100644
--- a/docs/economics/token-economics-synthesis.md
+++ b/docs/economics/token-economics-synthesis.md
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The $REGEN token is transitioning from an inflationary proof-of-stake model to a
 │          ▼                                                             │   │
 │    ┌───────────┐   ┌───────────┐   ┌───────────┐   ┌───────────┐   │   │
 │    │ BURN POOL │   │ VALIDATOR │   │ COMMUNITY │   │   AGENT   │   │   │
-│    │   (30%)   │   │ FUND (40%)│   │ POOL (25%)│   │ INFRA (5%)│   │   │
+│    │   (28%)   │   │ FUND (25%)│   │ POOL (45%)│   │ INFRA (2%)│   │   │
 │    └───────────┘   └───────────┘   └───────────┘   └───────────┘   │   │
 │          │               │               │               │         │   │
 │          ▼               ▼               ▼               ▼         │   │
@@ -106,10 +106,10 @@ poa_transition:
 
 ### Fee Distribution
 
-- **30%** → Burn Pool (supply reduction)
-- **40%** → Validator Fund (fixed compensation)
-- **25%** → Community Pool (governance-directed)
-- **5%** → Agent Infrastructure Fund
+- **28%** → Burn Pool (supply reduction)
+- **25%** → Validator Fund (fixed compensation)
+- **45%** → Community Pool (governance-directed)
+- **2%** → Agent Infrastructure Fund
 
 ---
 
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ poa_transition:
 agent_infrastructure:
   funding_sources:
     - community_pool_grants
-    - registry_fee_allocation (5% of fees)
+    - registry_fee_allocation (2% of fees)
     - partner_contributions
 
   sustainability_target:
diff --git a/phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md b/phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md
index 390d44a..cd71627 100644
--- a/phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md
+++ b/phase-2/2.6-economic-reboot-mechanisms.md
@@ -226,9 +226,17 @@ For each fee-generating transaction:
 
 #### Distribution Parameters
 
-> **NOTE**: The WG has discussed two distribution models. Both are documented here for transparency; the WG must resolve which to adopt.
+> **RESOLVED**: OQ-M013-1 has been resolved. The WG adopted a compromise between Model A and Model B. See `docs/governance/open-questions-resolution.md` and `docs/governance/economic-reboot-proposals.md` for the rationale.
 
-**Model A** (from token-economics-synthesis.md):
+**Resolved Distribution (28/25/45/2):**
+| Pool | Share | Purpose |
+|------|-------|---------|
+| Burn Pool | 28% | Supply reduction via M012 |
+| Validator Fund | 25% | Fixed compensation for authority validators |
+| Community Pool | 45% | Governance-directed spending via M015 |
+| Agent Infrastructure | 2% | AI agent operational costs (governance-directed) |
+
+**Model A** (from token-economics-synthesis.md — superseded):
 | Pool | Share | Purpose |
 |------|-------|---------|
 | Burn Pool | 30% | Supply reduction via M012 |
@@ -236,7 +244,7 @@ For each fee-generating transaction:
 | Community Pool | 25% | Governance-directed spending |
 | Agent Infrastructure | 5% | AI agent operational costs |
 
-**Model B** (from Gregory's Network Coordination Architecture, forum/19#67):
+**Model B** (from Gregory's Network Coordination Architecture, forum/19#67 — superseded):
 | Pool | Share | Purpose |
 |------|-------|---------|
 | Burn Pool | 25-35% | Supply reduction via M012 |
@@ -244,9 +252,7 @@ For each fee-generating transaction:
 | Community Pool | 50-60% | Contributor distribution via M015 |
 | Agent Infrastructure | (included in Community Pool) | Not separated |
 
-> **Note**: These are coordinated ranges — any valid configuration must satisfy Share Sum Unity (sum = 1.0). Not all combinations within ranges are valid. Example valid configurations: {25%, 15%, 60%}, {30%, 20%, 50%}, {35%, 15%, 50%}.
-
-> **OQ-M013-1**: Which distribution model should be adopted? Model A provides a dedicated Agent Infrastructure fund; Model B routes a larger share through governance. A hybrid approach could use Model A's structure with Model B's community-weighted emphasis.
+> ~~**OQ-M013-1**~~: **RESOLVED** — Hybrid model adopted: 28% burn, 25% validators, 45% community pool, 2% agent infrastructure.
 
 > **OQ-M013-5**: Should the Burn Pool exist at all, and if so, at what share?
 >