Skip to content

refactor(create-expert): document integration-manager design rationale#393

Merged
FL4TLiN3 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
refactor/383-integration-manager-rationale
Jan 3, 2026
Merged

refactor(create-expert): document integration-manager design rationale#393
FL4TLiN3 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
refactor/383-integration-manager-rationale

Conversation

@FL4TLiN3
Copy link
Contributor

@FL4TLiN3 FL4TLiN3 commented Jan 3, 2026

Summary

Adds explicit Design Rationale section to integration-manager explaining why multiple responsibilities are appropriate for this expert.

Added Design Rationale

## Design Rationale

This expert has multiple responsibilities (orchestration, trade-off analysis, scoring)
because they are all "integration" concerns - they require seeing both functional and
usability results together. Splitting these would require passing combined context
between more experts, adding complexity without benefit.

Why Keep Current Design

  1. All responsibilities are integration concerns - they need combined functional + usability results
  2. Splitting adds complexity - would require passing combined context between more experts
  3. Trade-off analysis needs both contexts - can't analyze security vs usability without both
  4. Scoring requires holistic view - needs all test results to calculate overall quality

Additional Changes

  • Refactored to use declarative style (matching other PRs in this series)
  • Replaced numbered workflow with "Testing Strategy" and "Responsibilities" sections
  • Added "Delegates" section for consistency

Closes #383

Test plan

  • CI passes
  • No behavior changes expected

Note

Integration-manager instruction updates

  • Adds explicit ## Design Rationale explaining why orchestration, trade-off analysis, and scoring stay within one expert (integration concerns requiring combined context)
  • Clarifies wording in Your Role and Testing Strategy (parallel delegation; holistic assessment) without changing delegates or functionality

Release note

  • Adds changeset for a patch release

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit aab1396. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

FL4TLiN3 and others added 2 commits January 3, 2026 07:51
Add explicit Design Rationale section to integration-manager explaining why
multiple responsibilities (orchestration, trade-off analysis, scoring) are
appropriate for this expert.

Key points:
- All responsibilities are "integration" concerns requiring combined results
- Splitting would add complexity without benefit
- Trade-off analysis needs both functional and usability context
- Scoring requires holistic view across all test results

Also refactored instruction to use declarative style:
- Replaced numbered workflow with "Testing Strategy" and "Responsibilities"
- Added "Delegates" section matching other expert patterns

Closes #383

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@FL4TLiN3 FL4TLiN3 force-pushed the refactor/383-integration-manager-rationale branch from 6fb5ade to aab1396 Compare January 3, 2026 07:51
@FL4TLiN3 FL4TLiN3 merged commit e55ada9 into main Jan 3, 2026
7 checks passed
@FL4TLiN3 FL4TLiN3 deleted the refactor/383-integration-manager-rationale branch January 3, 2026 07:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor: consider splitting integration-manager responsibilities

1 participant