Revoking MARV/RAVV seqs with patents

[arthurshem86]

Thanks for flagging this Emma and I totally agree with you to add these fields using the Genebank record. I also agree for the sequences (PP_004DCB4.1, PP_004DCC2.1) to be revoked since it is indicated in their Genebank record to be chimeric molecules.

I take note of other RAVV sequences with an "unassigned DNA" molecule type status in Genebank but without any notes. My question is whether these should be maintained? Below is the list of the RAVV sequences affected and they seem to be from the same first author.

Sequences with patent number WO2009128867

• PP_004DH5B.1 - Genebank HC069231.1

• PP_004DGZP.1 - Genebank HC069229.1

Affected sequences under patent number WO2010053573

• PP_004DHVW.1 - Genebank HC874673.1

• PP_004DHP8.1 - Genebank HC874671.1

Originally posted by @arthurshem86 in #10

Below are additional sequences that we can consider for revoking.

PP_004DCB4.1 Genebank AX717721.1 - patent WO02079239

PP_004DCC2.2 Genebank AX717725.1 - patent WO02079239

PP_004DCGU.1 Genebank CS402436.1 - patent WO2006037038

PP_004DCHR.1 Genebank CS402437.1 - patent WO2006037038

PP_004DDMG.1 Genebank PL092541.1 - patent KR 1020240003762-A/19

PP_004DHBZ.1 Genebank HC069237.1 - patent WO2009128867

PP_004DHHL.1 Genebank HC874669.1 - patent WO2010053573

PP_004DJLD.1 Genebank HC069227.1 - patent WO2009128867

PP_004JYE1.1 Genebank PU895860.1 - patent US 12247214 B2