@starbeam/peer and frames #3
Unanswered
wycats
asked this question in
Development Discussion
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
As I mentioned in 0b534b4, we intend for
@starbeam/peerto be the stable way that multiple versions of Starbeam can coexist in a single process.Exposing
nowandbumpsolves the problem for cells versioning, which covers a lot of ground, but it doesn't cover consumption, which is necessary for full interoperability.On the bright side, this problem only comes into play once we make a post-1.0 breaking change, but we should sort it out before 1.0.
Roughly speaking, we want to design a minimal API for consumption that can cover both consuming cells and frames, but without sucking in the whole design of
TIMELINE, which is actually a pretty good candidate for breaking changes.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions