Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
I feel like this is something that Pandoc has struggled with, and I don't think its currently proposed options for making tagged PDFs are great. I'm crossing my fingers that the Typst team will get there soon, though! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
This suggestion was posted more than 2 years ahead of the federal government deadline on this. We are now down to less than 3 months until all PDFs have to be tagged. This is to the point of being urgent. bump bump bump |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
I need to produce multiple accessible PDF documents (500+ documents) using an existing R code base. I have seen where R Markdown supports alternative text specifications (https://posit.co/blog/knitr-fig-alt/), but my experiments suggest that this alternative text is not included in the PDF output. The documents I need to produce have to pass WCAG standards.
I've read about the issues with automatic tagging, but I'm trying to avoid manual tagging wherever possible.
Can Quarto produce a tagged PDF? The final document should support a defined reading order, alternative text for images, and a layout for tables. What kind of LaTEX/Pandoc/Quarto specifications produce an accessible document?
TIA
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions