You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
💡 Idea: Support for Multiple AI Runtimes in a Single Session
Problem Statement
Currently, developers often work with multiple AI tools simultaneously (e.g., using Cursor for coding and Claude for architecture discussions). However, there's no clear way to ensure consistent context across these tools when they're both reading from the same .ai/ folder.
Proposed Solution
Add a session primitive to VERSA that allows:
Session tracking - Unique session IDs that persist across tool switches
Shared context - Memory that can be accessed by multiple runtimes
Tool handoffs - Explicit markers for "continuing this conversation in X tool"
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
💡 Idea: Support for Multiple AI Runtimes in a Single Session
Problem Statement
Currently, developers often work with multiple AI tools simultaneously (e.g., using Cursor for coding and Claude for architecture discussions). However, there's no clear way to ensure consistent context across these tools when they're both reading from the same
.ai/folder.Proposed Solution
Add a
sessionprimitive to VERSA that allows:Example Configuration
{ "format": "versa", "version": "1.0", "session": { "id": "sess_abc123", "active_tools": ["cursor", "claude"], "shared_memory": { "current_task": "Refactoring authentication system", "decisions": [ { "timestamp": "2025-10-16T10:30:00Z", "tool": "claude", "decision": "Use JWT with refresh tokens" } ] } } }Benefits
Alternative Approaches
Open Questions
Impact
What do you think? Would this be useful for your workflows? Any concerns or suggestions?
Vote with 👍 if you'd use this, or 👎 if you think it adds unnecessary complexity.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions