Skip to content

interestedParty description - normative requirements could be clearer #724

@kathryn-ods

Description

@kathryn-ods

Currently the description is "if interestedParty is a string, the interested party MAY be an entity or a person." The use of MAY here could be confusing. Clearer wording could be "The interested party MUST be one of: the recordId for an entity, the recordId for a person, or an Unspecified Record object."

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions