Skip to content

None of the Term classes (codeList) were picked by ShapeChange #19

@denevers

Description

@denevers

CodeList in GeoSciML 4 are understood as vocabulary by ShapeChange because the stereotype is ISO 19100::CodeList. In GeoSciML 3, it's just CodeList - but does not seem to come from any profile (no checkbox in EA). I think this qualifies as a genuine modification to the EAP file ?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions