diff --git a/docs/content/modeling/agents/overview.mdx b/docs/content/modeling/agents/overview.mdx
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ad3a72c352
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/content/modeling/agents/overview.mdx
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+id: overview
+title: 'Authorization for Agents'
+slug: /modeling/agents
+sidebar_position: 0
+description: Authorization patterns for AI agents and automated processes
+---
+
+import { CardGrid, DocumentationNotice, IntroCard, ProductName, ProductNameFormat } from '@components/Docs';
+
+
+
+This section presents authorization patterns for AI agents and automated processes using .
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/docs/content/modeling/agents/task-based-authorization.mdx b/docs/content/modeling/agents/task-based-authorization.mdx
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ff51ec4e99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/content/modeling/agents/task-based-authorization.mdx
@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+---
+title: Task-Based Authorization
+description: Modeling task-based authorization for agents
+sidebar_position: 1
+slug: /modeling/agents/task-based-authorization
+---
+
+import {
+ CheckRequestViewer,
+ DocumentationNotice,
+ ProductName,
+ ProductNameFormat,
+ RelatedSection,
+} from '@components/Docs';
+
+# Modeling Task-Based Authorization for Agents
+
+
+
+Agents need credentials to interact with APIs. These can be user or service credentials, for internal or third-party systems. In most cases, those permissions grant agents broad access to the system, as the authorization services that issue credentials for those APIs do not support granting fine-grained permissions. Consent prompts and service credentials are too coarse.
+
+Task-Based Authorization grants agents access to perform specific actions only when necessary, without permanent permissions. Agents start with zero permissions and receive only what a given task requires. For example, rather than allowing an agent to create tickets across all projects, you authorize it to "Create a ticket on project X" — scoping permissions to a specific context.
+
+This guide shows how to model task-based authorization in , progressing from a basic tool-calling model to patterns that support permission hierarchies, session scoping, expiration, and agent binding.
+
+## Tool authorization
+
+The simplest model represents tool authorization for a [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/) server. When a task starts, you write tuples granting it permission to call the tools it needs.
+
+```dsl.openfga
+model
+ schema 1.1
+
+type task
+
+type tool
+ relations
+ define can_call: [task, task:*]
+
+type tool_resource
+ relations
+ define tool: [tool]
+ define can_call: [task] or can_call from tool
+```
+
+A `tool` represents a capability (e.g. `slack_send_message`), and a `tool_resource` represents a specific target within that tool (e.g. a Slack channel). Granting `can_call` on a `tool` automatically grants access to all its resources. You can also grant access to individual resources, or use `task:*` to allow any task to call a tool.
+
+For example, you can grant `task:1` access to send any Slack message, while restricting `task:2` to a specific channel:
+
+```yaml
+tuples:
+ # Any task can list Slack channels
+ - user: task:*
+ relation: can_call
+ object: tool:slack_list_channels
+
+ # task:1 can send any Slack message
+ - user: task:1
+ relation: can_call
+ object: tool:slack_send_message
+
+ # task:2 can only send messages to channel XGA14FG
+ - user: task:2
+ relation: can_call
+ object: tool_resource:slack_send_message/XGA14FG
+```
+
+When checking whether `task:2` can call `tool_resource:slack_send_message/XGA14FG`, send a [contextual tuple](../../interacting/contextual-tuples.mdx) linking the resource to its tool. This avoids storing a tuple for every channel — you provide the tool-to-resource relationship at query time.
+
+
+
+## Domain-specific models
+
+The model above is generic. If you are building agents for your own application, the authorization model should reflect your application's domain. Consider a project management system:
+
+```dsl.openfga
+model
+ schema 1.1
+
+type user
+
+type task
+
+type organization
+ relations
+ define admin: [user]
+ define member: [user]
+
+type project
+ relations
+ define organization: [organization]
+
+ # relations for users
+ define owner: [user]
+ define member: [user]
+
+ # relations for tasks
+ define read: [task]
+ define write: [task]
+ define delete: [task]
+
+ # permissions for users
+ define can_delete: delete or owner or admin from organization
+ define can_edit: write or owner or admin from organization
+ define can_read: read or can_edit or member from organization
+ define can_create_ticket: can_edit
+
+type ticket
+ relations
+ define project: [project]
+ define owner: [user]
+
+ # relations for tasks
+ define read: [task]
+ define write: [task]
+ define delete: [task]
+ define can_delete: owner or delete or can_delete from project
+ define can_edit: owner or write or can_edit from project
+ define can_read: read or write or can_read from project
+```
+
+Here we enrich an existing user-oriented model by adding `task` as a principal. Granting a `task` the `write` relation on a project gives it permission to read/edit the project and all its tickets. You can also grant permissions at the ticket level for more granular control. This makes your application ready for agent authorization with minimal changes to your existing model.
+
+## Scoping permissions to sessions and agents
+
+In interactive agents, users may create multiple sessions. You can scope permissions to a session so that granting access applies to all tasks within it. You can also scope permissions to an agent, so they persist across sessions.
+
+```dsl.openfga
+model
+ schema 1.1
+
+type task
+
+type agent
+ relations
+ define task: [task]
+
+type session
+ relations
+ define task: [task]
+
+type tool
+ relations
+ define can_call: [task, session#task, agent#task]
+```
+
+The `can_call` relation accepts three types of assignments:
+
+- `task` — grant permission to a specific task.
+- `session#task` — grant permission to all tasks in a session. When the user says "allow this for this session", write a tuple like `user: session:1#task, relation: can_call, object: tool:slack_send_message`.
+- `agent#task` — grant permission to all tasks for an agent, across sessions. When the user says "always allow this", write a tuple with `agent:1#task` instead.
+
+Each task is linked to its session and agent when created:
+
+```yaml
+tuples:
+ # Link task to its agent and session
+ - user: task:1
+ relation: task
+ object: agent:1
+ - user: task:1
+ relation: task
+ object: session:1
+
+ # Grant session-level access
+ - user: session:1#task
+ relation: can_call
+ object: tool:slack_send_message
+```
+
+## Expiration and turn count
+
+You can use [conditions](../../configuration-language.mdx#conditional-relationships) to make permissions expire after a duration or a number of agent turns.
+
+```dsl.openfga
+model
+ schema 1.1
+
+type task
+
+type tool
+ relations
+ define can_call: [task, task with expiration, task with turn_count]
+
+condition expiration(grant_time: timestamp, grant_duration: duration, current_time: timestamp) {
+ current_time < grant_time + grant_duration
+}
+
+condition turn_count(turns_granted: int, current_turn: int) {
+ current_turn <= turns_granted
+}
+```
+
+The `expiration` condition grants access for a fixed duration from the grant time. The `turn_count` condition grants access for a fixed number of agent turns. When writing the tuple, you provide the condition parameters:
+
+```yaml
+tuples:
+ # task:1 can call the tool for 10 minutes
+ - user: task:1
+ relation: can_call
+ object: tool:slack_send_message
+ condition:
+ name: expiration
+ context:
+ grant_time: "2026-03-22T00:00:00Z"
+ grant_duration: 10m
+
+ # task:2 can call the tool for 2 turns
+ - user: task:2
+ relation: can_call
+ object: tool:slack_send_message
+ condition:
+ name: turn_count
+ context:
+ turns_granted: 2
+```
+
+When checking access, pass the current time or turn number in the request context.
+
+## Binding agents to tasks
+
+The examples above don't verify that the agent making the call is actually assigned to the task. You can enforce this using [contextual tuples](../../interacting/contextual-tuples.mdx) and an intersection (`and`) in the model, similar to the [Authorization Through Organization Context](../organization-context-authorization.mdx) pattern.
+
+```dsl.openfga
+model
+ schema 1.1
+
+type task
+
+type agent
+ relations
+ define task: [task]
+
+type tool
+ relations
+ define agent_in_context: [agent]
+ define can_call: [task] and task from agent_in_context
+```
+
+The `can_call` relation requires both that the task has been granted access **and** that the agent making the call is linked to the task. When the task is created, link it to its agent:
+
+```yaml
+tuples:
+ - user: task:1
+ relation: task
+ object: agent:1
+ - user: task:1
+ relation: can_call
+ object: tool:slack_send_message
+```
+
+At check time, send a contextual tuple identifying the calling agent. If the agent is linked to the task, the check returns `true`:
+
+
+
+If a different agent tries to use `task:1`, the check returns `false` because the agent-to-task link won't match:
+
+
+
+### Delegating task permissions to sub-agents
+
+Sub-agents also start with zero permissions. When delegating work, you have two options:
+
+- **Share the task**: assign the same task to the sub-agent, giving it all the task's permissions.
+- **Restrict further**: create a new task with a narrower set of permissions for the sub-agent.
+
+## Further reading
+
+Mapping user intent to the right set of permissions is an active area of research. These resources explore the topic:
+
+- [Intent-Based Access Control: Securing Agentic AI Through Fine-Grained Authorization](https://ibac.dev/)
+- [Delegated Authorization for Agents Constrained to Semantic Task-to-Scope Matching](https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26702)
+- [The Mission Shaping Problem](https://notes.karlmcguinness.com/notes/the-mission-shaping-problem/)
+- [Securing Agentic AI: authorization patterns for autonomous systems](https://dev.to/siddhantkcode/securing-agentic-ai-authorization-patterns-for-autonomous-systems-3ajo)
+
+## Related Sections
+
+
diff --git a/docs/sidebars.js b/docs/sidebars.js
index e7f963f7de..fca1cf6e4d 100644
--- a/docs/sidebars.js
+++ b/docs/sidebars.js
@@ -309,6 +309,23 @@ const sidebars = {
},
],
},
+ {
+ type: 'category',
+ collapsed: true,
+ collapsible: true,
+ label: 'Authorization for Agents',
+ link: {
+ type: 'doc',
+ id: 'content/modeling/agents/overview',
+ },
+ items: [
+ {
+ type: 'doc',
+ label: 'Task-Based Authorization',
+ id: 'content/modeling/agents/task-based-authorization',
+ },
+ ],
+ },
{
type: 'category',
collapsed: true,