-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Description
As far as I understand the factor that determines the arrangement of Plans and Networks in the corresponding columns is due date and alphabetical order respectively.
I suggest that:
-
Plans are arranged by due date, but maybe makes more sense that the oldest (closest to due date) is on top, since that is most probably require user's attention/contribution. Of course, if the user had the chance to order these either in descendent or ascendant due date would be even better.
-
Networks should be arranged by the level of user's involvement. For example, from top-down the networks which the user is:
(a) Coordinator
(b) Participant which has contributed
(c) Participant with no contributions so far
Then an alphabetical order could be the 2nd factor of course.