Skip to content

Order of Plans and Networks in columns #19

@MichalisKas

Description

@MichalisKas

As far as I understand the factor that determines the arrangement of Plans and Networks in the corresponding columns is due date and alphabetical order respectively.

I suggest that:

  1. Plans are arranged by due date, but maybe makes more sense that the oldest (closest to due date) is on top, since that is most probably require user's attention/contribution. Of course, if the user had the chance to order these either in descendent or ascendant due date would be even better.

  2. Networks should be arranged by the level of user's involvement. For example, from top-down the networks which the user is:
    (a) Coordinator
    (b) Participant which has contributed
    (c) Participant with no contributions so far
    Then an alphabetical order could be the 2nd factor of course.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions