Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
That is a bit contradicting. How should we map anoymous uploaders to their uploaded files? In order to do that, we would need an authenticated context. If we don't have that, we cannot distinguish one uploader from the others. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I would like to go into further investegation to this matter. We are a potential School-customer, and the need for an alternative to Google Classroom is crutial. The teacher needs to be able to distribute a template to the students (read-only) and the students need to be able to turn in their assignments. This is actually not far from the File Drop functionality. Please reach out if you want to dig deeper into it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just to clarify a bit: my original post might have been slightly misleading because I mentioned the school example. That was only meant as an analogy — my main use cases were the wedding scenarios I've set up using Nextcloud in the past, where this feature was always requested by the bride and groom. The idea with the school setting was only to show that a similar concept could exist there as well (for example, students continuing to access, edit, or delete their own submissions from the same browser using a session cookie or something similar). But my primary goal was really the event use case: guests uploading photos and videos (or other files) through a public link (usually via QR codes on tables), being able to see only their own uploads, and optionally deleting or replacing them if needed. Just to describe this again more clearly (tagging @sorentorp and @tbsbdr since it’s somewhat related but from a different perspective): Here’s how I imagine it would work from a user’s point of view:
This would make it very simple for large groups of people to contribute photos and videos (or other files) without accounts, while still keeping uploads separate per guest. If the idea is clear enough now, I’d be happy to open it later as a formal feature request — I mainly wanted to use this discussion to clarify whether it’s generally feasible or maybe already planned. Sorry if my original post caused any confusion — I’m not a developer and might have mixed a few ideas when I first described it. I just wanted to make sure the concept itself is clear now. 😊 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone 👋
I’m not entirely sure if this feature already exists or is planned — feel free to re-tag this discussion as a feature request or user story if appropriate. Since it might be a new concept, I’m posting it here under Ideas.
🎯 The use case
To illustrate this clearly, here’s a real-world example from my own university:
During exam submissions, each student uploaded their work via a shared link. They could later re-upload an updated version until the submission deadline, but only the professor or exam staff could view all submissions. Our university used a custom in-house system for this, but the concept fits perfectly here — ensuring privacy and control for students while maintaining centralized oversight for the instructor.
Imagine a public “File Drop” link that’s shared with many people (e.g. wedding guests or students submitting work).Everyone should be able to upload their own files without seeing or editing uploads from others, but still be able to view, replace, or update their own uploads until a deadline (if one is set).
So the requirements are:
This differs from the regular “Upload only” share,because in the classic file drop, all uploads go into one shared folder,and the system doesn’t distinguish between individual uploaders or allow later access for them.
⚙️ Background context
Originally, systems like Nextcloud were explored to see if such functionality existed. However, Nextcloud’s file drop feature is completely anonymous — the link acts like a single shared identity (/s/xyz123) and provides no per-uploader visibility or control. All files go into one shared bucket, and guests can’t see or update what they uploaded afterwards.
This mention is purely to highlight that even established solutions don’t offer this capability yet, which underlines why OpenCloud could stand out by implementing it.
💡 Why this would be useful
It’s a surprisingly common real-world scenario,and OpenCloud already feels like the perfect platform to finally solve it.
🧩 Non‑prescriptive notes (from a user’s perspective)
I’m not a core developer, so please treat the following as high‑level, non‑binding ideas. Implementation details are entirely up to the team.
(Happy to provide more context as an end user. I’ll gladly leave all design/implementation choices to the maintainers.)
🙏 Question
Is something like this already supported or planned on the roadmap?If not, I’d love to file it as a formal feature request — this could make OpenCloud uniquely strong in real-world group submission and event scenarios.
Thanks a lot for all your amazing work!OpenCloud has already solved many of the architectural limitations that made projects like Nextcloud so hard to extend.
Best regards
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions