ethicsAssessment should change to ethicsJurisdiction -> jurisdiction category

[lzehl]

relevant change for v5.0

Jurisdiction category is going to be created also for other v5.0 updates.
Related to:

• reassessment of actors, their affiliations, and relations to research product (versions) #513
• Introduce Jurisdiction related terminologies. openMINDS_controlledTerms#502

[lzehl]

@openMetadataInitiative/openminds-developers please check if that change would break anything in EBRAINS

[lzehl]

related to openMetadataInitiative/openMINDS_controlledTerms#502

[signybenediktsdottir]

This change would not cause issues for the curation team. We are not aware that the ethics assessment tag is used for other purposes. Note that we discussed that it would be good to keep the option to query for datasets based on the ethics assessment (i.e. Human + non-human primates vs. other species).

[lzehl]

@signybenediktsdottir the ethics assessment is not going to be usable any more to query for sensitive data (it will just give the jurisdiction). This should be done by querying the species and the preparation type (which is the more precise query anyway).