Skip to content

Creating records based on DOAJ #19

@zackbatist

Description

@zackbatist

Creating this issue to discuss how we should create records based on items listed in DOAJ.

I'm of the opinion that we should manually verify records for relevance, since the DOAJ classifies archaeology in a weird way (as an "auxiliary science of history"). It is also likely that there are relevant journals outside this category.

Some questions to address include:

  • What are our criteria for relevance?
  • Should we implement a process for arriving at consensus?
    • i.e., delegate two or three people to do an initial pass, and bring the items they can't agree on for discussion among the broader community, or some variant of this process

Any other discussion relating to importing DOAJ records (aside from the issues of relevance) should also be included here.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions