Training Data and Validation Data Different From Paper

[yen52205]

Hi,
In your code, I notice that you use DAVIS-2016 for training, and testing data in DAVIS-2016 validation sets.
But In paper, it seems that author didn't use DAVIS for offline training.
And for evaluation, the author use DAVIS-2016 train+val set, total 50 sequences and 3455 frames to evaluate and get mIOU 69.6%.

1. author mentioned datasets
   
2. evaluation sequence lists
   

I'm wondering whether the pretrained model that you kindly provided is trained by DAVIS-2016 train set, so that it may probably not propriate to directly compare with the mIOU in the paper.