Sharing iP code quality feedback [for @nickt121] #1
Description
@nickt121 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.
IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.
Aspect: Tab Usage
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Brace Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Package Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class Name Style
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Dead Code
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Method Length
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Class size
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Header Comments
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
Aspect: Recent Git Commit Messages
possible problems in commit 3df4622:
feat: add findtask feature
Add a new feature find to the application and a new method findTasks to tasklist to implement the new feature
- body not wrapped at 72 characters: e.g.,
Add a new feature find to the application and a new method findTasks to tasklist to implement the new feature
Suggestion: Follow the given conventions for Git commit messages for future commits (do not modify past commit messages as doing so will change the commit timestamp that we used to detect your commit timings).
Aspect: Binary files in repo
No easy-to-detect issues 👍
ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact cs2103@comp.nus.edu.sg if you want to follow up on this post.