Unnecessary duplicate clades in SH Nextclade dataset

[corneliusroemer]

Just noticed that there are duplicate clades in the SH dataset. Is the reason that we require a "Clade" but you thought we should also have a separate more accurately titled "MuV Genotype"?

We might want to relax this in Nextclade - but in the meanwhile we can maybe not show/add the MuV Genotype column so as not to have redundancy?

[j23414]

• "Clade" is inferred based on reference_strains.tsv
• "MuV Genotype" was from GenBank Annotations as a sanity check

But your point still stands, I'll drop "MuV Genotype" from the Mumps Nextclade datasets

[j23414]

This will be closed by nextstrain/nextclade_data#356