Skip to content

Subtle bug in disentangled_attention_bias? #162

@jmcmanus15

Description

@jmcmanus15

I think there may be a subtle bug in disentangled_attention_bias.

The HuggingFace implementation of this code is a more straightforward reproduction of Eqn (4) from the disentangled attention paper.

The implementation here tries to use a computational trick to reuse the embedding indices c2p_pos, which are computed for content-to-position, in the block for position-to-content.

I'm worried about these lines:

p2c_att = torch.bmm(pos_query_layer.to(key_layer)*scale, key_layer.transpose(-1, -2))
p2c_att = torch.gather(p2c_att, dim=-2, index=c2p_pos)

To be clear: I understand why this looks backwards, compared to the eqn in the paper. Using dim=-2 rather than dim=-1 in the gather effectively takes the transpose of the matrix product. That's completely fine.

But why is it safe to re-use c2p_pos here, effectively using _delta(i,j) rather than _delta(j,i). Transposing the Q matrix doesn't mean the row index _delta(i,j) changes to _delta(j,i).

The HuggingFace implementation computes a separate embedding indexing tensor for p2c.

I imagine this is the kind of thing that could go unnoticed, because it should have a relatively minor effect on results.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions